scholarly journals Application of point-of-care ultrasound for different types of esophageal foreign bodies: three case reports

Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. e18893
Author(s):  
Jung Hwan Ahn ◽  
Youdong Sohn
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Earl-Royal ◽  
Phi Nguyen ◽  
Al’ai Alvarez ◽  
Laleh Gharahbaghian

Aortic dissection (AD) is a rare, time-sensitive, and potentially fatal condition that can present with subtle signs requiring timely diagnosis and intervention. Although definitive diagnosis is most accurately made through computed tomography angiography, this can be a time-consuming study and the patient may be unstable, thus preventing the study’s completion. Chest radiography (CXR) signs of AD are classically taught yet have poor diagnostic reliability. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly used by emergency physicians for the rapid diagnosis of emergent conditions, with multiple case reports illustrating the sonographic signs of AD. We present a case of Stanford type B AD diagnosed by POCUS in the emergency department in a patient with vague symptoms, normal CXR, and without aorta dilation. A subsequent review of CXR versus sonographic signs of AD is described.


Author(s):  
Danilo Buonsenso ◽  
Antonio Chiaretti ◽  
Antonietta Curatola ◽  
Rosa Morello ◽  
Martina Giacalone ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 198-201
Author(s):  
Josie Acuña ◽  
Srikar Adhikari

Introduction: Cephalohematomas generally do not pose a significant risk to the patient and resolve spontaneously. Conversely, a subgaleal hematoma is a rare but more serious condition. While it may be challenging to make this diagnostic distinction based on a physical examination alone, the findings that differentiate these two conditions can be appreciated on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). We describe two pediatric patient cases where POCUS was used to distinguish between a subgaleal hematoma and a cephalohematoma. Case Reports: We describe one case of a 14-month-old male brought to the pediatric emergency department (PED) with concern for head injury. A POCUS examination revealed a large fluid collection that did not cross the sagittal suture. Thus, the hematoma was more consistent with a cephalohematoma and less compatible with a subgaleal hematoma. Given these findings, further emergent imaging was deferred in the PED and the patient was kept for observation. In the second case an 8-week-old male presented with suspected swelling over the right parietal region. A POCUS examination was performed, which demonstrated an extensive, simple fluid collection that extended across the suture line, making it more concerning for a subgaleal hematoma. Given the heightened suspicion for a subgaleal hematoma, the patient was admitted for further imaging and evaluation. Conclusion: Point-of-care ultrasound can be used to help differentiate between a subgaleal hematoma and a cephalohematoma to risk-stratify patients and determine the need for further imaging.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document