scholarly journals Three-day tracheal intubation manikin training for novice doctors using Macintosh laryngoscope, McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope and Pentax AirwayScope

Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. e23886
Author(s):  
Yuryo Murakami ◽  
Ryusuke Ueki ◽  
Miyuki Niki ◽  
Munetaka Hirose ◽  
Noriko Shimode
Keyword(s):  
Tracheal Intubation ◽  
Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽  
Mcgrath Mac

scholarly journals Comparison of Direct and Indirect Laryngoscopes in Vomitus and Hematemesis Settings: A Randomized Simulation Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryosuke Mihara ◽  
Nobuyasu Komasawa ◽  
Sayuri Matsunami ◽  
Toshiaki Minami
Keyword(s):  
Tracheal Intubation ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽  
Intubation Time ◽  
Direct Laryngoscope ◽  
Mcgrath Mac ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Intubation Success ◽  
Intubation Success Rate

Background.Videolaryngoscopes may not be useful in the presence of hematemesis or vomitus. We compared the utility of the Macintosh laryngoscope (McL), which is a direct laryngoscope, with that of the Pentax-AWS Airwayscope (AWS) and McGRATH MAC (McGRATH), which are videolaryngoscopes, in simulated hematemesis and vomitus settings.Methods.Seventeen anesthesiologists with more than 1 year of experience performed tracheal intubation on an adult manikin using McL, AWS, and McGRATH under normal, hematemesis, and vomitus simulations.Results.In the normal setting, the intubation success rate was 100% for all three laryngoscopes. In the hematemesis settings, the intubation success rate differed significantly among the three laryngoscopes (P=0.021). In the vomitus settings, all participants succeeded in tracheal intubation with McL or McGRATH, while five failed in the AWS trial with significant difference (P=0.003). The intubation time did not significantly differ in normal settings, while it was significantly longer in the AWS trial compared to McL or McGRATH trial in the hematemesis or vomitus settings (P<0.001, compared to McL or McGRATH in both settings).Conclusion.The performance of McGRATH and McL can be superior to that of AWS for tracheal intubation in vomitus and hematemesis settings in adults.

scholarly journals A comparison of the ease of tracheal intubation using a McGrath MAC®laryngoscope and a standard Macintosh laryngoscope

Anaesthesia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 70 (11) ◽  
pp. 1281-1285 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. D. Wallace ◽  
L. T. Foulds ◽  
G. A. McLeod ◽  
R. A. Younger ◽  
B. E. McGuire
Keyword(s):  
Tracheal Intubation ◽  
Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽  
Mcgrath Mac

scholarly journals Evaluation of the McGrath MAC and Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in 2000 patients undergoing general anaesthesia: the randomised multicentre EMMA trial study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. e016907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Kriege ◽  
Christian Alflen ◽  
Irene Tzanova ◽  
Irene Schmidtmann ◽  
Tim Piepho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tracheal Intubation ◽  
Direct Laryngoscopy ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽  
Video Laryngoscope ◽  
Successful Intubation ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Mcgrath Mac ◽  
First Pass

IntroductionThe direct laryngoscopy technique using a Macintosh blade is the first choice globally for most anaesthetists. In case of an unanticipated difficult airway, the complication rate increases with the number of intubation attempts. Recently, McGrath MAC (McGrath) video laryngoscopy has become a widely accepted method for securing an airway by tracheal intubation because it allows the visualisation of the glottis without a direct line of sight. Several studies and case reports have highlighted the benefit of the video laryngoscope in the visualisation of the glottis and found it to be superior in difficult intubation situations. The aim of this study was to compare the first-pass intubation success rate using the (McGrath) video laryngoscope compared with conventional direct laryngoscopy in surgical patients.Methods and analysisThe EMMA trial is a multicentre, open-label, patient-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Consecutive patients requiring tracheal intubation are randomly allocated to either the McGrath video laryngoscope or direct laryngoscopy using the Macintosh laryngoscope. The expected rate of successful first-pass intubation is 95% in the McGrath group and 90% in the Macintosh group. Each group must include a total of 1000 patients to achieve 96% power for detecting a difference at the 5% significance level. Successful intubation with the first attempt is the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints are the time to intubation, attempts for successful intubation, the necessity of alternatives, visualisation of the glottis using the Cormack & Lehane score and percentage of glottic opening score and definite complications.Ethics and disseminationThe project was approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical Association of the Rhineland Palatine state and Westphalia-Lippe. The results of this study will be made available in the form of manuscripts for publication and presentations at national and international meetings.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov NCT 02611986; pre-results.

scholarly journals A Laryngoscope for Obstetrical Use an Obstetrical Laryngoscope

1977 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Kessell
Keyword(s):  
Tracheal Intubation ◽  
Cricoid Pressure ◽  
Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽  
The Right

Rapid tracheal intubation, using the standard Macintosh laryngoscope, can be hindered in obstetrical patients by the handle of the laryngoscope hitting the patient's engorged breasts and the hand of the assistant applying cricoid pressure. To overcome these difficulties a variation of the laryngoscope is described. The right angle of the blade to the handle is opened by a further 20°.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document