scholarly journals Cardiopulmonary bypass as a bridge for bronchial foreign body removal in a child with pulmonary artery sling

Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (32) ◽  
pp. e26908
Author(s):  
Shuxian Li ◽  
Lei Wu ◽  
Meixia Huang ◽  
Junfen Zhou ◽  
Yingshuo Wang ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 463-469
Author(s):  
Nagarajan Muthialu ◽  
Thomas Martens ◽  
Meletios Kanakis ◽  
Laurynas Bezuska ◽  
Masakazu Nakao ◽  
...  

Background Pulmonary artery sling is commonly associated with tracheal stenosis and intracardiac anomalies. While surgical repair is standardized, coexistent anomalies often determine outcomes. With the paucity of risk stratification, this study aimed to review our experience and stratify risk factors for the surgical outcome of complex pulmonary artery sling repair in the presence of airway or intracardiac lesions. Methods Seventy-nine consecutive children with pulmonary artery sling were evaluated retrospectively following surgical repair. Median age at surgery was 5 months (interquartile range 3–9). Surgical approaches included pulmonary artery sling alone ( n = 10), pulmonary artery sling with tracheoplasty ( n = 41), and pulmonary artery sling with both intracardiac and tracheal surgery ( n = 28). Results There were 7 early (8.8%) deaths. Two patients after left pulmonary artery reimplantation needed revision of the anastomosis. The median intensive care and hospital stay were 11 (interquartile range 9.2–24.8) and 17.9 (interquartile range 4.3–19.8) days, and considerably longer when associated tracheal surgery ( p = 0.002). Follow-up was complete in 66/69 and 3 (3.8%) children died late: 2.7, 10.2, and 17 months after surgery. Univariate analysis showed abnormal lung and coexisting structural heart disease as risk factors. Multivariate analysis revealed total cardiopulmonary bypass time as an independent predictor of overall mortality. Conclusion Complex pulmonary artery sling repair can be performed with a good surgical outcomes even when associated with airway malformations or structural heart diseases. Lung abnormality and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time as a surrogate marker of complex surgery, are possible risk factors.


2003 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Conte ◽  
G. Farina ◽  
G. Caianello ◽  
G. Palma ◽  
C. Pisacane ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-31
Author(s):  
Margaret A. Kenna ◽  
Charles D. Bluestone

Foreign bodies of the aerodigestive tract have been recognized for centurles. Before the early 20th century, foreign body aspiration or ingestion often meant prolonged illness and death.1 Prior to the advent of modern endoscopy, bronchotomy was the primary method of laryngotracheo-bronchial foreign body removal, and blunt metallic hooks, wire nooses, esophageal forceps, and pieces of linen attached to a piece of whalebone were used to extract foreign bodies from the esophagus.2 Not surprisingly, Weist, in 1882 (as cited by Clerf2), reported a 27.4% death rate for patients undergoing bronchotomy v a 23.2% mortality for those who were not treated. In 1911, LeRoche (as cited by Clerf2) reported the use of a rigid esophagoscope for removal of sharp foreign objects. It was Chevalier Jackson, however, who developed and refined aerodigestive endoscopy. By 1936, he was able to report a decrease in mortality from foreign bodies from 24% to 2% and a 98% success rate for bronchoscopic removal.1 Although there have been marked changes in anesthesia, equipment, and endoscopic teaching since Jackson's time, his remarkable record of success has not been significantly improved upon. The mortality for all recent series is now well below 1%, mainly due to improved anesthesia, instrumentation, and medical therapy of the suppurative complications.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. e34-e37
Author(s):  
Lee Gonzalez ◽  
Adriana Candelario ◽  
Yomayra Otero ◽  
Luna Torres-Luna ◽  
Onix Cantres ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-129
Author(s):  
Shawn D. St. Peter ◽  
KuoJen Tsao ◽  
Carrie L. Whittaker ◽  
Adam J. Schow ◽  
Gary Grist

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document