Recent advances in viral inner ear disorders

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 404-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason A. Beyea ◽  
Sumit K. Agrawal ◽  
Lorne S. Parnes
2001 ◽  
Vol 94 (12) ◽  
pp. 1049-1053
Author(s):  
Hiroshi YAMASHITA

2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 417
Author(s):  
Naoaki Yanagihara ◽  
Toshiyuki Hinohira ◽  
Jun Hyoudo

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Nguyen ◽  
Judith S. Kempfle ◽  
David H. Jung ◽  
Charles E. McKenna

2013 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Li ◽  
L Yu ◽  
R Xia ◽  
F Gao ◽  
W Luo ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground:To investigate the feasibility of postauricular hypodermic injection for treating inner ear disorders, we compared perilymph pharmacokinetics for postauricular versus intravenous injection, using magnetic resonance imaging, in an animal model.Methods:Twelve albino guinea pigs were divided randomly into two groups and administered gadopentetate dimeglumine via either a postauricular or an intravenous bolus injection. A 7.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging system was used to assess the signal intensities of gadolinium-enhanced images of the cochlea, as a biomarker for changes in gadopentetate dimeglumine concentration in the perilymph. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated based on these signal intensity values.Results:Guinea pigs receiving postauricular injection showed longer times to peak signal intensity, longer elimination half-life, longer mean residence time and a greater area under the signal–time curve (from pre-injection to the last time point) (p < 0.05).Conclusion:Postauricular injection shows potential as an efficient drug delivery route for the treatment of inner ear disorders.


1992 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. S1-S11
Author(s):  
Noriyuki Yanagita ◽  
Shigeji Fukuta ◽  
Hisashi Yokoi ◽  
Kazuya Ishida ◽  
Tsutomu Nakashima

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document