Complications of Central Venous Access Devices in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease and Thalassemia Major

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Ordóñez ◽  
Agustín del Cañizo ◽  
Cristina Beléndez ◽  
Marina García-Morín ◽  
Laura Pérez-Egido ◽  
...  
1995 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayman Abdul-Rauf ◽  
Michael Gauderer ◽  
Kathleen Chiarucci ◽  
Brian Berman

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2057-2057
Author(s):  
Nancy Maserejian ◽  
Cortney Hayflinger ◽  
Susan Eaton ◽  
Catherine Madigan ◽  
William E. Hobbs

Abstract Central venous access devices (CVADs), such as tunneled central venous catheters (tCVADs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), help provide essential care for some patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). CVADs facilitate administration of multiple intravenous (IV) medications and blood products, as well as blood draws for laboratory analysis. Understanding CVAD use and complications is particularly relevant for SCD patients because of their high risk of having insufficient peripheral IV access. Prior studies describing CVAD use and complications in SCD patients were limited by small sample sizes, typically including 15-20 SCD patients in a single treatment center. The resulting estimates for CVAD use and complications in SCD patients vary widely, are insufficient for development of evidence-based guidelines, and may not be representative of the treatment burden in the broader SCD population. The purpose of this study was to describe the frequency of CVAD use and CVAD-associated complications among SCD patients in a large US population sample. We used data from two large U.S. insurance claims databases from Truven Health MarketScan® Research to examine both Medicaid-insured and commercially-insured SCD patients. From January 2009 through December 2013, these databases encompassed over 14 million Medicaid-insured and over 116 million commercially-insured patients. SCD patients were defined as patients with at least two International Classification of Disease-9 (ICD-9) diagnosis codes for SCD (282.41-42, 282.6x) on separate dates in excess of sickle cell trait codes, or one ICD-9 code for an inpatient (emergency department or hospitalization) visit with sickle cell crisis. CVAD insertions were identified using relevant procedure codes for tCVADs or PICCs. We conducted two sets of analyses for each database: (1) per patient among those with at least one CVAD insertion, and (2) per CVAD insertion. We conducted descriptive analyses on the frequency of CVAD-related procedures (e.g., repair, replacement, removal of obstructive material, repositioning), complications, and infections, thromboses, or phlebitis. A total 17,119 Medicaid-insured SCD patients and 21,342 commercially-insured SCD patients were observed for an average of 3-4 years, during which 1,945 (11.4%) and 1,316 (6.2%) patients, respectively, had at least one CVAD insertion. Most SCD patients (80%) were aged >18 y at time of first CVAD insertion; 18% of adult Medicaid SCD patients had at least one CVAD inserted. The mean number of CVAD insertions per patient was 3.1 (Medicaid) and 2.4 (commercially-insured). In the per CVAD analysis, complication claims were frequent, including infection (31-37%), thrombosis (4-5%), and phlebitis/thrombophlebitis (12-15%). The mean time to removal of CVADs (duration) was 31-34 days (PICC lines) and 102 days (tCVADs). In the per patient analysis, 54.3% had infection claims, 24.3% had thrombosis claims, and 10.2% had phlebitis/thrombophlebitis claims in Medicaid (see Table and Figure; additional results to be provided, also stratified by age). Both tCVADs and PICCs were commonly used in SCD patients, particularly adults, with high occurrence of infection, thrombosis and phlebitis/thrombophlebitis, as well as repeated CVAD insertions. Determinants of CVAD use and complications warrant further investigation to inform practice standards. These findings from a large observational study indicate that device-related risks of administering IV treatments are limitations of IV treatment options and may add to SCD treatment burden. Table 1. Medicaid-Insured Commercially-Insured Any CVAD (Overall) PICC Only tCVAD Only Both PICC and tCVAD Any CVAD (Overall) PICC Only tCVAD Only Both PICC and tCVAD N (%) 1,945 681 (35.0%) 893 (45.9%) 371 (19.1%) 1,316 450 (34.2%) 664 (50.5%) 202 (15.3%) Age, mean (sd) y 30.0 (16.3) 34.2 (14.9) 26.9 (17.5) 30.1 (13.6) 32.6 (17.1) 34.1 (15.8) 31.3 (18.3) 33.2 (15.9) CVAD insertions per patient, mean (sd) 3.1 (3.9) 3.1 (3.9) 1.8 (1.3) 6.2 (5.8) 2.4 (2.3) 2.5 (2.6) 1.6 (1.0) 4.5 (2.9) CVAD insertions total 6,107 3,651 2,456 n/a 3,082 1,636 1,446 n/a Duration per CVAD, median days 44 31 102 n/a 53 34 102 n/a CVAD complications, % patients with CVAD Complication, general 28.8% 13.2% 31.8% 50.1% 22.3% 9.1% 25.9% 39.6% Removal of obstructive material 11.2% 3.8% 15.3% 14.6% 9.0% 2.4% 11.4% 15.3% Replacement 8.3% 3.7% 10.2% 12.4% 6.5% 3.8% 6.5% 12.9% Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Maserejian: Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hayflinger:Biogen: Consultancy, Employment. Eaton:Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Madigan:Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hobbs:Biogen: Employment, Equity Ownership.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4173-4173
Author(s):  
Kristine Matusiak ◽  
Stephanie Forte ◽  
Jameel Abdulrehman ◽  
Madeleine Verhovsek ◽  
Kevin H.M. Kuo

Abstract Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) induces a chronic prothrombotic state, with a cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) reported to be 11% by age 40. Central venous access devices (CVAD) are commonly used for chronic transfusions and iron chelation in this patient population.The presence of a CVAD is an additional risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), with a catheter related thrombosis rate of 24%. Despite this high risk of VTE, the role of thromboprophylaxis in this setting is uncertain due to a lack of high quality data. Methods: A survey was administered in March 2021 to physicians caring for adult sickle cell disease patients via the Canadian Haemoglobinopathy Association (CanHaem), covering nine SCD comprehensive care centers in Canada. One reminder email was distributed after 3 weeks to encourage participation. Questions were directed at characterizing the practice size, number of patients with CVADs, and the role of thromboprophylaxis for CVADs. Physicians were also surveyed about their willingness to enroll their SCD patients with CVADs in a randomized trial of thromboprophylaxis versus placebo. Items were generated and selected based on face and content validity. Results are reported in medians and percentages, where applicable. Results: Responses were collected from 14 physicians who care for a median of 100 (IQR 185) adult sickle cell disease patients in practices across Canada. Physicians reported approximately 5% of their patients currently require a CVAD, and physicians estimated no CVAD patients are lost to follow up. Respondents use a variety of CVADs, including port-a-caths (75%), followed by PICC lines (58%), tunneled (25%) and non-tunneled CVCs (25%) (Figure 1). Duration of venous access was reported to be <1 month (17%), 1-3 months (8%), 3-6 months (0%), 6-12 months (8%), and >12 months (67%). Fifty percent of respondents indicated they do not use thromboprophylaxis for CVADs. Responses varied with respect to choice and dose of antiplatelet or anticoagulant in cases where thromboprophylaxis is used (Figure 2). Forty-two percent of physicians indicated they were not very confident or not at all confident in choice of prophylaxis. Past history of VTE was the most cited factor influencing the choice to use thromboprophylaxis. Physicians were generally in favour of enrolling patients in an RCT using thromboprophylaxis for CVADs. The exception was that 69% answered "No" when asked about enrolling patients with a prior history of VTE who are not currently on anticoagulation. One-hundred percent of physicians agreed that an RCT would improve their confidence in decision-making around thromboprophylaxis in their patients with CVADs. Conclusions: While there is evidence for an increased risk of VTE for SCD patients with CVADs, our results suggest there remains clinical equipoise with respect to the use of thromboprophylaxis. Thromboprophylaxis options were variable when physicians chose to use them, as there is no evidence to support specific antithrombotic regimens. All physicians surveyed are supportive of an RCT to clarify this management approach, and many would enroll their patients. As a result of this survey, a Canadian multicenter pilot RCT addressing this question is currently underway. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Forte: Pfizer: Research Funding; Canadian Hematology Society: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Verhovsek: Vertex: Consultancy. Kuo: Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apellis: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: This survey explored the use of LMWH, direct oral anticoagulants, warfarin and ASA for prophylaxis among patients with sickle cell disease using a central venous access device.


2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven C. Wagner ◽  
David J. Eschelman ◽  
Carin F. Gonsalves ◽  
Joseph Bonn ◽  
Kevin L. Sullivan

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1649-1649
Author(s):  
Nirmish Shah ◽  
Daniel Landi ◽  
Radhika Shah ◽  
Jennifer Rothman ◽  
Courtney Thornburg

Abstract Abstract 1649 INTRODUCTION: Implantable venous access devices (VADs) are used in sickle cell disease (SCD) for patients with poor venous access to facilitate chronic blood transfusions and management of acute complications. Children and adults with chronic illnesses have high rates of VAD-related complications including bloodstream infection and thrombosis. Patients with SCD may be at higher risk given the presence of functional asplenia and evidence of a hypercoaguable state. The objective of this study was to define the frequency of VAD related bloodstream infections and thrombosis in adults and children with SCD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a single institution retrospective review of VAD placement in patients with SCD. Subjects were identified through the sickle cell clinic database and the Hospital Information System. Subjects were included if they had SCD, VAD placement between December 1, 1998 to December 1, 2009 and had completed at least 12 months of follow-up. VAD-related bloodstream infection was defined by positive blood culture and VAD-related thrombosis (deep vein thrombosis, superior vena cava syndrome, and pulmonary embolism without lower extremity thrombosis) was defined by imaging. Comparisons were made between pediatric and adult sickle cell patients using Student's t-test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables; p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of the greater than 800 sickle cell patients followed at our Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center, 32 subjects were eligible for inclusion (median age 20 years, range 1–59). There were 81 VAD placed (median 2.6 VAD per patient, range 1–7) with a total of 49268 catheter days (median 608, range 323–3999). The mean catheter lifespan in adults (1798 days ± 266) was significantly higher than pediatric patients (971 ± 328, p=0.039). There were a total of 66 VAD-related bloodstream infections (1.34 infections per 1000 catheter days) occurring in 17 of 32 (53%) subjects. Although not statistically significant, children had fewer VAD-related bloodstream infections (3 of 10; 30%) compared to adults (14 of 22; 64%, p=0.08). There were 24 catheter-related thromboses (0.49 thromboses per 1000 catheter days) occurring in 10 of 32 (41%) of subjects. Children also had fewer VAD-related thrombosis (1 of 10; 10%) compared to adults (9 of 22; 40%, p=0.08). The overall rates of infection and thrombosis per 1000 catheter days were not significantly different between adult and pediatric patients. CONCLUSION: In summary, we report a long lifespan and low rate of infection in the subjects who had VADs during the study period. Most concerning was a high proportion of adults with catheter-related thrombosis, which adds the burden of anticoagulation to patient management and put patients at risk for post-thrombotic syndrome. Potential lifespan of VADs, risk of bloodstream infection and thrombosis as well as its long-term consequences should be discussed with patients and families considering VAD placement. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2011 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirmish Shah ◽  
Daniel Landi ◽  
Radhika Shah ◽  
Jennifer Rothman ◽  
Laura M. De Castro ◽  
...  

Hematology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 450-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haewon C. Kim

Abstract The primary function of red blood cells (RBCs) is to deliver oxygen from the lungs to tissues. Tissue hypoxia occurs when the oxygen-carrying capacity of RBCs is compromised due primarily to 3 causes: (1) a reduction in circulating RBC mass, (2) an increase in circulating RBC mass, or (3) abnormal hemoglobin (Hb) that either does not sufficiently release oxygen to tissues (high-oxygen-affinity hemoglobin) or occludes the microvasculature due to deformed RBCs (sickled RBCs). To improve oxygenation in patients with reduced or increased RBC mass, RBC administration (simple transfusion) or RBC removal (RBC depletion) is performed, respectively. However, for patients with abnormal Hb, RBCs containing abnormal Hb are removed and replaced by healthy volunteer donor RBCs by red cell exchange (RCE). RCE can be performed by manual exchange or by automated exchange using a blood cell separator (erythrocytapheresis). In this review, indications for RCE in sickle cell disease using the evidence-based American Society for Apheresis categories1 are presented and the rationale for RCE in each disorder are discussed. Simple transfusion versus RCE and manual RCE versus automated RCE are compared. Finally, this review briefly presents some of the challenges of performing erythrocytapheresis in small children and discusses various choices for central venous access during RCE.2


1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (02) ◽  
pp. 251-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Monreal ◽  
Antoni Alastrue ◽  
Miquel Rull ◽  
Xavier Mira ◽  
Jordi Muxart ◽  
...  

SummaryCentral venous access devices are often essential for the administration of chemotherapy to patients with malignancy, but its use has been associated with a number of complications, mainly thrombosis. The true incidence of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in this setting is difficult to estimate since there are very few studies in which DVT diagnosis was based on objective tests, but its sequelae include septic thrombophlebitis, loss of central venous access and pulmonary embolism.We performed an open, prospective study in which all cancer patients who underwent placement of a long-term Port-a-Cath (Pharmacia Deltec Inc) subclavian venous catheter were randomized to receive or not 2500 IU sc of Fragmin once daily for 90 days. Venography was routinely performed 90 days after catheter insertion, or sooner if DVT symptoms had appeared. Our aims were: 1) to investigate the effectiveness of low doses of Fragmin in preventing catheter-related DVT; and 2) to try to confirm if patients with high platelet counts are at a higher risk to develop subclavian DVT, as previously suggested.On the recommendation of the Ethics Committee, patient recruitment was terminated earlier than planned: DVT developed in 1/16 patients (6%) taking Fragmin and 8/13 patients (62%) without prophylaxis (Relative Risk 6.75; 95% Cl: 1.05-43.58; p = 0.002, Fisher exact test). No bleeding complications had developed. As for prediction of DVT, there was a tendency towards a higher platelet count in those patients who subsequently developed DVT, but differences failed to reach any statistical significance (286 ±145 vs 207 ±81 X 109/1; p = 0.067). According to our experience, Fragmin at the dosage used proved to be both effective and safe in these patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-49
Author(s):  
Basant K. Puri ◽  
Anne Derham ◽  
Jean A. Monro

Background: The use of indwelling Central Venous Access Devices (CVADs) is associated with the development of bloodstream infections. When CVADs are used to administer systemic antibiotics, particularly second- or higher-generation cephalosporins, there is a particular risk of developing Clostridium difficile infection. The overall bloodstream infection rate is estimated to be around 1.74 per 1000 Central Venous Catheter (CVC)-days. Objective: We hypothesised that daily oral administration of the anion-binding resin colestyramine (cholestyramine) would help prevent infections in those receiving intravenous antibiotic treatment via CVADs. Method: A small case series is described of adult patients who received regular intravenous antibiotic treatment (ceftriaxone, daptomycin or vancomycin) for up to 40 weeks via indwelling CVADs; this represented a total of 357 CVC-days. In addition to following well-established strategies to prevent C. difficile infection, during the course of the intravenous antibiotic treatment the patients also received daily oral supplementation with 4 g colestyramine. Results: There were no untoward infectious events. In particular, none of the patients developed any symptoms or signs of C. difficile infection, whereas approximately one case of a bloodstream infection would have been expected. Conclusion: It is suggested that oral colestyramine supplementation may help prevent such infection through its ability to bind C. difficile toxin A (TcdA) and C. difficile toxin B (TcdB); these toxins are able to gain entry into host cells through receptor-mediated endocytosis, while anti-toxin antibody responses to TcdA and TcdB have been shown to induce protection against C. difficile infection sequelae.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document