Commentary on “Neonatal PT Improves Neurobehavior and General Movements in Moderate to Late Preterm Infants Born in India: An RCT”

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-217
Author(s):  
Ashley Pinger ◽  
Lindsey Woosley
2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A533.1-A533
Author(s):  
A Scheuchenegger ◽  
J Pansy ◽  
F Dobaja ◽  
C Einspieler ◽  
B Resch

2013 ◽  
Vol 89 (12) ◽  
pp. 1063-1066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Brogna ◽  
Domenico M. Romeo ◽  
Chiara Cervesi ◽  
Luana Scrofani ◽  
Mario G. Romeo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 208-216
Author(s):  
Sonia Khurana ◽  
Bhamini Krishna Rao ◽  
Leslie E. Lewis ◽  
Senthil D Kumaran ◽  
Asha Kamath ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy Seesahai ◽  
Maureen Luther ◽  
Carmen Cindy Rhoden ◽  
Paige Terrien Church ◽  
Elizabeth Asztalos ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Prediction of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes remains an elusive goal for neonatology. Clinical and socioeconomic markers have not proven to be adequately reliable. The limitation in prognostication includes those term and late-preterm infants born with neonatal encephalopathy. The General Movements Assessment tool by Prechtl has demonstrated reliability for identifying infants at risk for neuromotor impairment. This tool is non-invasive and cost-effective. The purpose of this study is to identify the published literature on how this tool applies to the prediction of cerebral palsy in term and late-preterm infants diagnosed with neonatal encephalopathy and so detect the research gaps. Methods We will conduct a systematic scoping review for data on sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and describe the strengths and limitations of the results. This review will consider studies that included neonates more than or equal to 34+0 weeks gestational age, diagnosed with neonatal encephalopathy, with a General Movements Assessment done between birth to six months of life and an assessment for cerebral palsy by at least two years of age. Experimental and quasi-experimental study designs including randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, before and after studies, interrupted time-series studies and systematic reviews will be considered. Text and opinion papers will not be considered for inclusion in this scoping review as this is a highly specific and medical topic. Studies in the English language only will be considered. Studies published from at least 1970 will be included as this is around the time when the General Movements Assessment was first introduced in neonatology as a potential predictor of neuromotor outcomes. We will search five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, Scopus and CINAHL). Two reviewers will conduct all screening and data extraction independently. The articles will be categorized according key findings and a critical appraisal performed.Discussion The results of this review will guide future research to improve early identification and timely intervention in neonates with neonatal encephalopathy at risk of neuromotor impairment.Systematic review registration Title registration with Joanna Briggs Institute.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy Seesahai ◽  
Maureen Luther ◽  
Carmen Cindy Rhoden ◽  
Paige Terrien Church ◽  
Elizabeth Asztalos ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Prediction of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes remains an elusive goal for neonatology. Clinical and socioeconomic markers have not proven to be adequately reliable. The limitation in prognostication includes those term and late-preterm infants born with neonatal encephalopathy. The General Movements Assessment tool by Prechtl has demonstrated reliability for identifying infants at risk for neuromotor impairment. This tool is non-invasive and cost-effective. The purpose of this study is to identify the published literature on how this tool applies to the prediction of cerebral palsy in term and late-preterm infants diagnosed with neonatal encephalopathy and so detect the research gaps. Methods We will conduct a systematic scoping review for data on sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and describe the strengths and limitations of the results. This review will consider studies that included infants more than or equal to 34+0 weeks gestational age, diagnosed with neonatal encephalopathy, with a General Movements Assessment done between birth to six months of life and an assessment for cerebral palsy by at least two years of age. Experimental and quasi-experimental study designs including randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, before and after studies, interrupted time-series studies and systematic reviews will be considered. Case reports, case series, case control and cross-sectional studies will be included. Text, opinion papers and animal studies will not be considered for inclusion in this scoping review as this is a highly specific and medical topic. Studies in the English language only will be considered. Studies published from at least 1970 will be included as this is around the time when the General Movements Assessment was first introduced in neonatology as a potential predictor of neuromotor outcomes. We will search five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, Scopus and CINAHL). Two reviewers will conduct all screening and data extraction independently. The articles will be categorized according key findings and a critical appraisal performed. Discussion The results of this review will guide future research to improve early identification and timely intervention in infants with neonatal encephalopathy at risk of neuromotor impairment.


Author(s):  
T. Debillon ◽  
P. Tourneux ◽  
I. Guellec ◽  
P.-H. Jarreau ◽  
C. Flamant

Author(s):  
Ruka Nakasone ◽  
Kazumichi Fujioka ◽  
Yuki Kyono ◽  
Asumi Yoshida ◽  
Takumi Kido ◽  
...  

To date, the difference in neurodevelopmental outcomes between late preterm infants (LPI) born at 34 and 35 gestational weeks (LPI-34 and LPI-35, respectively) has not been elucidated. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 months of corrected age for LPI-34 and LPI-35, and to elucidate factors predicting neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI). Records of all LPI-34 (n = 93) and LPI-35 (n = 121) admitted to our facility from 2013 to 2017 were reviewed. Patients with congenital or chromosomal anomalies, severe neonatal asphyxia, and without developmental quotient (DQ) data were excluded. Psychomotor development was assessed as a DQ using the Kyoto Scale of Psychological Development at 18 months of corrected age. NDI was defined as DQ < 80 or when severe neurodevelopmental problems made neurodevelopmental assessment impossible. We compared the clinical characteristics and DQ values between LPI-34 (n = 62) and LPI-35 (n = 73). To elucidate the factors predicting NDI at 18 months of corrected age, we compared clinical factors between the NDI (n = 17) and non-NDI (n = 118) groups. No significant difference was observed in DQ values at 18 months of corrected age between the groups in each area and overall. Among clinical factors, male sex, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), hyperbilirubinemia, and severe hyperbilirubinemia had a higher prevalence in the NDI group than in the non-NDI group, and IVH and/or severe hyperbilirubinemia showed the highest Youden Index values for predicting NDI. Based on the results of this study, we can conclude that no significant difference in neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 months of corrected age was observed between LPI-34 and LPI-35. Patients with severe hyperbilirubinemia and/or IVH should be considered to be at high risk for developing NDI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document