Are Women With Endocervical Adenocarcinoma at Risk for Lynch Syndrome? Evaluation of 101 Cases Including Unusual Subtypes and Lower Uterine Segment Tumors

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 463-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne M. Mills ◽  
Sofia Liou ◽  
Christina S. Kong ◽  
Teri A. Longacre
2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (36) ◽  
pp. 5965-5971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon N. Westin ◽  
Robin A. Lacour ◽  
Diana L. Urbauer ◽  
Rajyalakshmi Luthra ◽  
Diane C. Bodurka ◽  
...  

Purpose Endometrial carcinoma in the lower uterine segment (LUS) is a poorly described cancer that can be clinically confused with endocervical carcinoma. We performed a case-comparison study to document the clinicopathologic characteristics of LUS tumors and their association with risk factors for endometrial cancer. Patients and Methods The clinical records and pathology reports from women who underwent hysterectomy at our institution for endometrial or endocervical adenocarcinoma over an 11-year interval were reviewed. The LUS group consisted of women with endometrial tumors that clearly originated between the lower uterine corpus and the upper endocervix. Immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability and MLH1 methylation assays were performed. Results Thirty-five (3.5%) of 1,009 women had endometrial carcinoma of the LUS. Compared with patients with corpus tumors, LUS patients were younger, had higher stage tumors, and had more invasive tumors. Preoperative diagnosis of the LUS tumors more frequently included the possibility of endocervical adenocarcinoma. Seventy-three percent of the LUS tumors had an immunohistochemical expression pattern typical of conventional endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Ten (29%) of 35 women with LUS tumors were confirmed to have Lynch syndrome or were strongly suspected to have Lynch syndrome on the basis of tissue-based molecular assays. Conclusion The prevalence of Lynch syndrome in patients with LUS endometrial carcinoma (29%) is much greater than that of the general endometrial cancer patient population (1.8%) or in endometrial cancer patients younger than age 50 years (8% to 9%). On the basis of our results, the possibility of Lynch syndrome should be considered in women with LUS tumors.


2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 513-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison M. Burton ◽  
Susan K. Peterson ◽  
Salma K. Marani ◽  
Sally W. Vernon ◽  
Christopher I. Amos ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 711-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maegan E. Roberts ◽  
Douglas L. Riegert-Johnson ◽  
Brittany C. Thomas ◽  
Kandelaria M. Rumilla ◽  
Colleen S. Thomas ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8_2020 ◽  
pp. 96-104
Author(s):  
Barinov S.V. Barinov ◽  
Tirskaya Yu.I. Tirskaya ◽  
Kadtsyna T.V. Kadtsyna ◽  
Lazareva O.V. Lazareva ◽  
Medyannikova I.V. Medyannikova ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 544-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew B. Yurgelun ◽  
Rowena Mercado ◽  
Margery Rosenblatt ◽  
Monica Dandapani ◽  
Wendy Kohlmann ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1513-1513
Author(s):  
Z. K. Stadler ◽  
R. Stern ◽  
V. Devlin ◽  
E. Glogowski ◽  
N. Kauff ◽  
...  

1513 Introduction: In addition to colorectal cancer (CRC), Lynch syndrome (LS) patients are at increased risk of extracolonic malignancies including endometrial (EC), ovarian (OC), upper gastrointestinal and urothelial tract cancers. Although the efficacy of extracolonic cancer screening in LS has not been clearly demonstrated, multi-organ screening is routinely recommended for LS patients (Lindor et al., JAMA 2006). Anecdotal evidence suggests that adherence to such screening may be inferior to CRC screening. Methods: 35 adults, identified in the context of genetic counseling and testing (GCT) as being from LS kindreds, were given recommendations for multi-organ screening and enrolled on a prospective follow-up study. For participants with relevant organs at risk, these included colonoscopy, urine cytology, transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), CA-125 level and endometrial sampling all to be performed at least annually. Adherence with screening, perceived risk of cancer subtype and future intentions regarding screening were evaluated at least 12 months after GCT. Results: Median age at time of GCT was 44, 66% were female and 69% were diagnosed with a LS- related cancer prior to GCT (15 CRC; 9 EC). At time of follow-up, 89% of patients without CRC had a colonoscopy within the year. Among women at-risk for OC, 25% had TVUS and 38% had CA-125 level within the year. Among women at risk for EC, 22% had TVUS and 22% had endometrial sampling within the year. Of all participants, 40% had urine cytology within the year. Of participants with relevant organs at-risk, 72%, 33%, 75% and 12% reported their risk of developing CRC, EC, OC, and urothelial tract cancer, respectively, as “moderately”, “very” or “extremely” high. Of patients with previous colonoscopy, 93% had definitive intentions to continue on schedule screening. However, only 68%, 50%, 60% and 50% of patients who underwent previous urine cytology, TVUS, CA-125 or endometrial sampling, respectively, had definitive intentions of continuing on schedule screening. Conclusions: Adherence with extracolonic cancer screening in LS kindreds is poor and patients persistently underestimate their extracolonic risk despite GCT. Possible interventions should be aimed at better educating patients about extracolonic cancer risk and importance of on-going surveillance. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Liliana Cossio ◽  
Patricia Koehler-Santos ◽  
Suzana Arenhart Pessini ◽  
Heleuza Mónego ◽  
Maria Isabel Edelweiss ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Ezzell Hunter ◽  
Kathleen A. Arnold ◽  
Jennifer E. Cook ◽  
Jamilyn Zepp ◽  
Marian J. Gilmore ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document