scholarly journals Surgical Error Compensation Claims as a Patient Safety Indicator

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Vicente-Guijarro ◽  
José Lorenzo Valencia-Martín ◽  
Carlos Fernández-Herreruela ◽  
Paulo Sousa ◽  
José Joaquín Mira Solves ◽  
...  
QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahi M Al-Tehewy ◽  
Sara E. M Abd AlRazak ◽  
Maha M Wahdan ◽  
Tamer S. F Hikal

Abstract Background Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) were developed as a tool for hospitals to identify potentially preventable complications and improve patient safety performance. Aim the study aimed to measure the association between the AHRQ patient safety indicator PSI9 (Perioperative hemorrhage or hematoma) and the clinical outcome including death, readmission within 30 days and length of stay at the cardiothoracic surgery hospital Ain Shams University. Methods exploratory prospective cohort study was conducted to follow up patients from admission till 1 month after discharge at the cardiothoracic surgery hospital who fulfills the inclusion criteria. Data were collected for 330 patients through basic information sheet and follow-up sheet. Results the incidence rate of PSI9 was 49.54 per 1000 discharges. Demographic data was not significantly associated with increased incidence of PSI9. The risk of development of PSI9 was significantly higher in patients admitted directly to ICU [relative risk (RR) =5.6]. The risk of death and readmission was higher in cases developed PSI9 than the cases without PSI9 [RR = 2.40 (0.60-9.55) and 2.43 (0.636 - 9.48) respectively]. Conclusion high incidence rate of PSI9 and the incidence is higher in male gender and 60 years old and more patients. Those patients developed PSI9 were at high risk for readmission and death. Recommendations the hospital administration should consider strategies and policies to decrease the rate of PSI9 and subsequent unfavorable clinical outcomes.


2011 ◽  
Vol 165 (2) ◽  
pp. 329
Author(s):  
M. Cevasco ◽  
A.M. Borzecki ◽  
A.K. Rosen ◽  
Q. Chen ◽  
P.A. Zrelak ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Graham Brack ◽  
Penny Franklin ◽  
Jill Caldwell

Most healthcare professionals take up their career because they want to make people better. It is rare—but not unknown—to find nurses deliberately harming patients. It is not always possible to cure a patient’s condition, and readers may be surprised to hear the view of Lord Justice Stuart-Smith that our ‘only duty as a matter of law is not to make the victim’s condition worse’ (Capital and Counties plc v Hampshire CC (1997) 2 All ER 865 at 883). Despite our best intentions, healthcare professionals do sometimes make the patient’s condition worse. There are too many instances of harm caused to patients. Not only does the patient suffer harm, staff will be upset (some may even give up their careers) and large compensation claims may be made which deplete NHS resources. According to the NHS Litigation Authority, in 2010–11 it received 8655 claims of clinical negligence and 4346 claims of non-clinical negligence against NHS bodies, and paid £863 million in connection with clinical negligence claims (NHSLA Annual Report and Accounts, 2011). To put that into perspective, NHS Warwickshire had a budget of £827m for that year, so this amount would fund a mediumsized PCT. For all these reasons, therefore, our first concern must be to do no harm to our patient. If we can improve their condition, so much the better, but at the very least we must leave them no worse off for having put themselves in our care. Patient safety must be everyone’s concern. It is monitored by the NHS Commissioning Board Special Health Authority. Until June 2012 there was a separate agency, the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA), which produced a report in 2009 entitled Safety in doses: improving the use of medicines in the NHS . There were 811 746 reports to the NPSA in 2007, of which 86 085 were related to medication. The figures for July 2010– June 2011 show an increase to 1.27 million incidents, of which 133 727 were related to medication.


Author(s):  
Aura Pyykönen ◽  
Mika Gissler ◽  
Maija Jakobsson ◽  
Lasse Lehtonen ◽  
Anna-Maija Tapper

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (8) ◽  
pp. 776-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Therese M. Duane ◽  
Rajesh Ramanathan ◽  
Patrick Leavell ◽  
Catherine Mays ◽  
Dale Harvey

We sought to determine whether concurrent (before discharge) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality patient safety indicator evaluation would result in a more expeditious review, accurate reporting, and improved reimbursement. We compared the period of preconcurrent (preC) coding (January 2012 to June 2012) with the period after concurrent coding (postC) began (July 2012 to December 2012) for total billing errors. There were 276 records reviewed in the preC versus 424 in the postC time periods. Overall coding errors were 225 (81.5%) preC versus 365 (86.1%) postC ( P = nonsignificant), whereas documentation errors were present in 26 (9.4%) preC versus 40 (9.4%) postC ( P = nonsignificant). Total charges were $3,782,024 preC and $2,011,144 postC. Recodes requiring rebilling were 21 (7.6%) preC for a total of $213,723 rebilled versus four (0.9%) postC for a total of $31,327 rebilled ( P < 0.0001). Time from service to review was 98.7 preC versus 52.3 postC days ( P < 0.0001). Time from service until rebill submitted averaged 100.8 preC versus 54.0 postC days ( P = 0.06). Concurrent review allows for more accurate reporting because recodes are completed before discharge. Billing delays prolong time to reimbursement and results in loss of revenue.


2011 ◽  
Vol 212 (6) ◽  
pp. 946-953.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann M. Borzecki ◽  
Haytham Kaafarani ◽  
Marisa Cevasco ◽  
Kathleen Hickson ◽  
Sally MacDonald ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 212 (6) ◽  
pp. 935-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann M. Borzecki ◽  
Haytham M.A. Kaafarani ◽  
Garth H. Utter ◽  
Patrick S. Romano ◽  
Marlena H. Shin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document