Utility of the Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Patient Safety Indicator

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1389-1391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre R. Marra ◽  
Debra B. Jansen ◽  
Michael B. Edmond
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Safety Indicator ◽  
Infection Patient ◽  
Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection

scholarly journals USE OF CLINICAL INDICATORS IN THE EVALUATION OF PREVENTION AND CONTROL PRACTICES FOR BLOODSTREAM INFECTION

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1018-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisca Jane Gomes de Oliveira ◽  
Joselany Afio Caetano ◽  
Viviane Martins da Silva ◽  
Paulo César de Almeida ◽  
Andrea Bezerra Rodrigues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Clinical Indicators ◽  
And Control ◽  
Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate the compliance of the implemented prevention and control practices for central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection, through clinical indicators. An observational study, with a quantitative approach, was conducted. The case series was based on 2064 evaluations, conducted through direct observation and medical records, using a manual for evaluating the quality of cross-infection control practices. The results showed that the indicator for the registrations of the insertion and dwell time of the catheter had the highest overall compliance rate (62.5%). The indicator related to hand hygiene, on the other hand, showed a null overall compliance rate. Strategies must be developed to ensure adherence to the prevention and control practices for central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection and periodic evaluations of working conditions must be implemented, in order to raise compliance rates.

Use of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Prevention Practices by US Hospitals

2007 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 672-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Krein ◽  
Timothy P. Hofer ◽  
Christine P. Kowalski ◽  
Russell N. Olmsted ◽  
Carol A. Kauffman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection

scholarly journals Needleless Closed System Does Not Reduce Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection: A Retrospective Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuru Ishizuka ◽  
Hitoshi Nagata ◽  
Kazutoshi Takagi ◽  
Keiichi Kubota
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Closed System ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection

Abstract The needleless closed system (NCS) has been disseminated in several clinical fields to prevent central venous catheter–related bloodstream infection (CVC-RBSI), in place of the conventional Luer cap system (LCS). The purpose of this study is to examine whether NCS is really superior to conventional LCS for prevention of CVC-RBSI. Between May 2002 and December 2008, 1767 patients received CVC in our department. The time interval from insertion to development of CVC-RBSI was compared retrospectively between selected patients who were treated using the conventional LCS (group 1, n = 89, before June 2006) and the NCS (group 2, n = 406, June 2006 and after). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference in the time interval from insertion to development of CVC-RBSI between the two groups. NCS does not reduce CVC-RBSI in adult colorectal cancer patients who undergo CVC insertion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document