Nonossifying Fibroma can Mimic Residual Lymphoma in FDG PET: Additional Value of Combined PET/CT

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 640-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian von Falck ◽  
Herbert Rosenthal ◽  
Klaus F. Gratz ◽  
Michael Galanski
2012 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 448-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Evangelista ◽  
Annalori Panunzio ◽  
Roberta Polverosi ◽  
Alice Ferretti ◽  
Sotirios Chondrogiannis ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. e193-e196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Cho ◽  
Se-woong Kim ◽  
Jiyoun Choi ◽  
Wonjun Kang ◽  
Jong-doo Lee ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol Special iss (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehrdad Bakhshayeshkaram ◽  
Farahnaz Aghahosseini ◽  
Abtin Doroudinia ◽  
Soheyla Zahirifard ◽  
Mojtaba Ansari ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mette S. van Ramshorst ◽  
Suzana C. Teixeira ◽  
Bas B. Koolen ◽  
Kenneth E. Pengel ◽  
Kenneth G. Gilhuijs ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 145 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Jin Jeong ◽  
Do-Young Kang ◽  
Hyun Jin Yoon ◽  
Hye Joo Son

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 475
Author(s):  
Kota Yokoyama ◽  
Junichi Tsuchiya ◽  
Yuji Nakamoto ◽  
Ukihide Tateishi

To assess the additional value of 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-d-glucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/CT over conventional morphological imaging techniques in the treatment response assessment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) to molecular targeted therapy (MTT), we performed a meta-analysis of all the available studies to compare the predictive value of [18F]FDG PET or PET/CT and conventional imaging techniques for assessing the response to MTT in GIST. We determined the sensitivities and specificities across studies, we calculated the positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR) and made summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) using hierarchical regression models. Pooled analysis included 4 studies comprising 88 patients. The performance characteristics in [18F]FDG PET or PET/CT and CT were as follows: sensitivity, 89% (95% confidence interval (CI) 78, 95), 52% (39, 64); specificity, 65% (44, 83), 92% (75, 99); diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), 5.8 (2.0, 16.8 4.9 (1.5, 16.1); positive LR, 1.9 (1.1, 3.4), 3.0 (1.1, 8.1); and negative LR, 0.23 (0.03, 1.6), 0.66 (0.42, 1.0), respectively. In SROC curves, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.81 (SE, 0.11) and 0.71 (SE, 0.13) and the Q* index was 0.74 and 0.66, respectively. [18F]FDG PET/CT had higher sensitivity, while DOR and SROC curves showed better diagnostic performance in [18F]FDG PET and PET/CT studies as compared to CT.


2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaia Grassetto ◽  
Adriano Fornasiero ◽  
Giorgio Bonciarelli ◽  
Elena Banti ◽  
Lucia Rampin ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Evangelista ◽  
Annalori Panunzio ◽  
Anna Rita Cervino ◽  
Lorenzo Vinante ◽  
Adil Al-Nahhas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document