Comparison of Clinical Results in Nasal Tip Augmentation Either Via Face to Face or Back to Back Technique With Autogenous Auricular Conchal Cartilage

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 2109-2114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Sertan Sahin ◽  
Fikret Kasapoglu ◽  
Uygar Levent Demir ◽  
Omer Afsin Ozmen ◽  
Hakan Coskun ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Ce Zhang ◽  
Ting-ting Jin ◽  
Jing-yu Li ◽  
Sheng Yan ◽  
Ye Zhao ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 566-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Hagerty ◽  
Stephen Mittelstaedt ◽  
Le Phong Vu ◽  
Alan S. Harmatz ◽  
Tracy S. Harvey

1994 ◽  
Vol 111 (3P1) ◽  
pp. 219-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A. Adamson ◽  
Todd A. Morrow

It is generally agreed that rhinoplasty is the most challenging procedure performed by the facial plastic surgeon. Mastery of nasal tip maneuvers to alter tip projection, rotation, and lobule refinement is intrinsic to successful rhinoplasty technique. The nasal hinge region comprises the most lateral aspect of the lower lateral cartilage. Its importance is often overlooked. As the foundation of the nasal base, It plays a key role in tip dynamics and can be sculpted to significantly modify projection, rotation, and lobule refinement. One hundred randomly selected rhinoplasty patients were studied with respect to the indications for hinge maneuvers, techniques applied, and resulting affect on tip aesthetics. Clinical results are shown. The applicability of these hinge techniques is compared with other lateral crural techniques. The importance of the hinge region in rhinoplasty dynamics and the necessity of knowledgeably applying surgical maneuvers in this region are discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 86 (3S) ◽  
pp. S189-S193
Author(s):  
Yanyan Shi ◽  
Xiaoyan Tan ◽  
Haiyang Sun ◽  
Sydney Char

Author(s):  
Luis Suso-Martí ◽  
Roy La Touche ◽  
Aida Herranz-Gómez ◽  
Santiago Angulo-Díaz-Parreño ◽  
Alba Paris-Alemany ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Telerehabilitation is an option that should be adapted as soon as possible in order to face the crisis caused by COVID-19. An umbrella and mapping review with meta–meta-analysis (MMA) of the available scientific evidence was performed to determine if telerehabilitation could be an effective alternative to conventional rehabilitation in physical therapist practice. Methods A systematic review of reviews and a synthesis of the findings of all systematic evidence published to date with a visual map and a meta-meta-analysis (MMA) were performed. A systematic search was realized in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), MEDLINE (PubMed), and Google Scholar. Two independent reviewers performed a data analysis and assessed the quality of the included reviews, assessing the risk of bias using ROBIS. Results Twenty-nine articles that met the inclusion criteria were selected and divided according to the type of patient targeted for rehabilitation (patients with cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neurological conditions). The MMA regarding physical function between telerehabilitation and usual care rehabilitation did not reveal a statistically significant difference for patients with cardiorespiratory and musculoskeletal conditions. For patients with neurological conditions, the MMA revealed a statistically significant but negligible effect size in 6 reviews in favor of telerehabilitation (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.18; 95% CI = 0.03–0.34). Conclusion The results of the present review showed that telerehabilitation offers positive clinical results, even comparable to conventional face-to-face rehabilitation approaches. Impact The advantages of lower cost and less interference by the rehabilitation processes in patients’ daily life could justify implementing telerehabilitation in clinical settings in the COVID-19 era.


1992 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Jerger
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Zubow ◽  
Richard Hurtig

Children with Rett Syndrome (RS) are reported to use multiple modalities to communicate although their intentionality is often questioned (Bartolotta, Zipp, Simpkins, & Glazewski, 2011; Hetzroni & Rubin, 2006; Sigafoos et al., 2000; Sigafoos, Woodyatt, Tuckeer, Roberts-Pennell, & Pittendreigh, 2000). This paper will present results of a study analyzing the unconventional vocalizations of a child with RS. The primary research question addresses the ability of familiar and unfamiliar listeners to interpret unconventional vocalizations as “yes” or “no” responses. This paper will also address the acoustic analysis and perceptual judgments of these vocalizations. Pre-recorded isolated vocalizations of “yes” and “no” were presented to 5 listeners (mother, father, 1 unfamiliar, and 2 familiar clinicians) and the listeners were asked to rate the vocalizations as either “yes” or “no.” The ratings were compared to the original identification made by the child's mother during the face-to-face interaction from which the samples were drawn. Findings of this study suggest, in this case, the child's vocalizations were intentional and could be interpreted by familiar and unfamiliar listeners as either “yes” or “no” without contextual or visual cues. The results suggest that communication partners should be trained to attend to eye-gaze and vocalizations to ensure the child's intended choice is accurately understood.


1998 ◽  
Vol 138 (3) ◽  
pp. 559-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vieira Mota ◽  
Correia ◽  
Resende ◽  
Azevedo ◽  
Mesquita‐Guimarães
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document