Patients With Nasal Fracture

Abdullah Sindi; Yousef Abaalkhail; Moayyad Malas; Abdullah Alghamdi; Mahmoud Joharji

doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000006269

Contemporary Trends in Procedural Volume for Adult Facial Trauma, 1996-2006

Otolaryngology ◽

10.1177/0194599811427825 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 146 (2) ◽

pp. 226-229 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Linda N. Lee ◽

Neil Bhattacharyya

Keyword(s):

Medical Center ◽

Academic Medical Center ◽

Mandibular Fracture ◽

Facial Trauma ◽

Facial Fracture ◽

National Hospital Discharge Survey ◽

Historical Cohort ◽

Key Indicator ◽

Nasal Fracture ◽

Procedural Volume

Objectives. To determine how rates of operative facial fractures may have changed between 1996 and 2006 and to determine the potential impact of such change on otolaryngology residency surgical key indicator cases. Study Design. Historical cohort study. Setting. Academic medical center. Subjects and Methods. The National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) and National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery (NSAS) 1996 and 2006 cases were reviewed, extracting all cases of adult nasal, malar/zygomatic, maxillary, and mandibular fracture reductions in inpatient and outpatient settings, respectively. Procedure rates for each facial fracture were tabulated and compared between 1996 and 2006. Results. Overall in 1996, there were an estimated 113,041 ± 3740 operative facial fracture repairs performed. Among the 3 key indicator fracture repairs most relevant to otolaryngologists, there were 15,810 ± 2143 open nasal fracture reductions, 9360 ± 1742 open zygomaticomaxillary (ZMC) fracture reductions, and 20,214 ± 2585 open mandibular fracture repairs. Overall in 2006, there were 120,463 ± 7554 total facial fracture procedures, with 11,613 ± 2846 open nasal fracture reductions, 10,216 ± 2881 open ZMC fracture reductions, and 17,965 ± 3171 open mandibular repairs. Comparing cohorts, there was no significant change in number of open nasal, ZMC, or mandibular fracture repairs ( P = .24, P = .58, P = .80, respectively). Conclusion. Facial fracture procedure rates have remained largely stable over the past 10 years. These data have implications for otolaryngology training programs and could help guide resident education in facial trauma.

Get full-text (via PubEx)

1402 Impact of COVID-19 on Nasal Fracture Presentation and Epidemiology: A Retrospective Comparative Case-series Study

British Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1093/bjs/znab259.569 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽

Author(s):

A Hassane ◽

S Palaniappan ◽

M Szostok ◽

M Shakeel

Keyword(s):

Local Anaesthetic ◽

Older Patients ◽

Nasal Congestion ◽

Case Series ◽

Nasal Fracture ◽

Case Series Study ◽

The Common ◽

The Difference ◽

Nasal Fractures ◽

Series Study

Abstract Aim Nasal fractures (NF) are the most common ENT presentation and commonly managed in the clinic or A&E. With the recent COVID pandemic, this study aims to assess the difference in demographics, incidence and aetiology in NF since the start of the first lockdown (16/03/2020) as well as management of nasal fractures. Method Retrospectively, data collection on demographics, history and management over 5 years (2015-2020) for all patients presenting with symptoms of nasal fracture. Data was collected on password-protected Excel spreadsheet and subsequent statistical analysis performed using IBM SPSS Statistics. Results A total of 346 patients were identified of which 36 were diagnosed during the lockdown. Seventy-one percent were ≤40 years old and common aetiology recorded was assault (n = 85), sports (n = 85) and falls (n = 77). Mechanical fall was the common aetiology in older patients. Across gender, falls was the most common aetiology in females (37/94) and assault for males (72/246). Epistaxis (57%) and nasal congestion (31.8%) were most commonly reported symptoms. Before lockdown, Fifty-six percent of the cohort underwent manipulation of NF under local anaesthetic and no intervention needed in 39% while 58% underwent no intervention during the lockdown. No patients were readmitted in 30 days who were treated conservatively or with local anaesthetic during the lockdown. Conclusions This study showed that the most common cause of NF was sports and assault while during the lockdown, falls was the leading cause. More patients were managed conservatively during the lockdown with no 30-readmission showing that conservative management was as effective as management under local anaesthetic.

Get full-text (via PubEx)