Thromboelastography Changes of Whole Blood Compared to Blood Component Transfusion in Infant Craniosynostosis Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia Nelson ◽  
Lezhou Wu ◽  
Jordan W. Swanson ◽  
Grace Hsu ◽  
Michele P. Lambert ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harriet Tucker ◽  
Laura Green ◽  
Karim Brohi ◽  
Rebecca Cardigan ◽  
Ross Davenport ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundPre-hospital blood component transfusion poses logistical challenges. Current patterns of pre-hospital blood use across the UK are not known. A potential benefit of providing a single combined component of whole blood is reduced need for multiple steps of administering separate components and more efficient use of time and resources by medical staff. .Objectivesto undertake a detailed time-analysis of the steps of pre-hospital combined component transfusion against separate blood component transfusion, and to determine current UK pre-hospital transfusion practice and users’ optimal pre-hospital transfusion strategyMethodsA three-arm cross-over major haemorrhage simulation study compared: flow-time (time from decision-to-transfuse [DTT] to complete transfusion); touch-time (direct team ’hands on’ contact time with transfusion process); and number of steps, people and equipment required for transfusion of 2 units of RCP [arm-A], 2 RBC + 2 TP [arm-B] or RBC + 2 Lyoplas [arm-C]). A national survey of current and optimal pre-hospital transfusion strategies was sent to 22 UK Air Ambulance Services (AAS) and 27 Major Trauma Centres (MTC) in December 2019. ResultsThe simulation demonstrated that arm-A had a shorter flow-time (median 6min 31sec vs. 12min 20 sec, vs 16min 29 sec) and touch-time (median 2min 31 seconds vs. 5min 21sec vs. 15min 3sec) than arm-B and arm-C respectively, and required fewer steps, equipment and checks. 18 MTCs and 18 AAS responded to the national survey (response rates of 67 and 82%). 10 transfused RBC/plasma (5 TP/5 Lyoplas), 4 RBC only, 2 Lyoplas only, 1 RBC/Lyoplas/Fibrinogen, and 1 ’red cell and plasma’ (only available at one hospital site). 89% replied that a combined component transfusion would be desirable, as it would reduce patient mortality (83%) and tasks on scene (75%). ConclusionThe time-analysis established the benefits for combined pre-hospital component transfusion in trauma patients. The national survey demonstrates the variation in current pre-hospital transfusion practice and reiterates that combined component transfusion pre-hospital may have logistical advantages over separate components.


1995 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-278
Author(s):  
Douglas G. Clayton ◽  
Adelaida M. Miro ◽  
David J. Kramer ◽  
Nathaniel Rodman ◽  
Stanley Wearden

Vox Sanguinis ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Cid ◽  
L. Magnano ◽  
M. Lozano
Keyword(s):  

Surgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 156 (3) ◽  
pp. 564-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hunter B. Moore ◽  
Ernest E. Moore ◽  
Theresa L. Chin ◽  
Eduardo Gonzalez ◽  
Michael P. Chapman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document