Conflicts of Interest in Studies Related to Mesh Use in Ventral Hernia Repair and Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Yurie Sekigami ◽  
Tina Tian ◽  
Sydney Char ◽  
Jacob Radparvar ◽  
Jeffrey Aalberg ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 3502-3508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Gómez-Menchero ◽  
Juan Francisco Guadalajara Jurado ◽  
Juan Manuel Suárez Grau ◽  
Juan Antonio Bellido Luque ◽  
Joaquin Luis García Moreno ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel W. Ross ◽  
B. Todd Heniford ◽  
Vedra A. Augenstein

Incisional and Ventral hernia repair (VHR) is one of the most common surgical procedures in the world, and over the last two decades this field has enjoyed exponentially advances thanks to improvements in operative technique and biomechanical science. Truly complex hernias which are multiply recurrent, have active infections, loss of domain, presence of stomas, require component separation or panniculectomy, or have other exacerbating factors are truly challenging to manage operatively, and the multidisciplinary operations to repair them have become known collectively as abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Herein, we describe the surgical history of AWR, the current state of surgical techniques and mesh science, as well as novel areas for advancement of the field in the future. In particular, a focus on patient specific clinical outcomes such as hernia recurrence, wound complications, and quality of life has been made with regards to mesh position and selection. Our goal is to provide a comprehensive review of the state of the literature and our recommendations for AWR, for the Plastic, General, and Hernia surgeon alike. This review contains 7 figures, 3 tables, and 79 references. Keywords: ventral hernia repair, incisional hernia, abdominal wall reconstruction, mesh, pre-peritoneal hernia repair, pre-operative optimization, clinical outcomes, mesh position, surgical site infection, robotic hernia repair


2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (8) ◽  
pp. 778-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel W. Ross ◽  
Bindhu Oommen ◽  
Ciara Huntington ◽  
Amanda L. Walters ◽  
Amy E. Lincourt ◽  
...  

Modern adjuncts to complex, open ventral hernia repair often include component separation (CS) and/or panniculectomy (PAN). This study examines nationwide data to determine how these techniques impact postoperative complications. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from 2005 to 2013 for inpatient, elective open ventral hernia repairs (OVHR). Cases were grouped by the need for and type of concomitant advancement flaps: OVHR alone (OVHRA), OVHR with CS, OVHR with panniculectomy (PAN), or both CS and PAN (BOTH). Multivariate regression to control for confounding factors was conducted. There were 58,845 OVHR: 51,494 OVHRA, 5,357 CS, 1,617 PAN, and 377 BOTH. Wound complications (OVHRA 8.2%, CS 12.8%, PAN 14.4%, BOTH 17.5%), general complications (15.2%, 24.9%, 25.2%, 31.6%), and major complications (6.9%, 11.4%, 7.2%, 13.5%) were different between groups ( P < 0.0001). There was no difference in mortality. Multivariate regression showed CS had higher odds of wound [odds ratio (OR) 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5–2.0], general (OR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.3–1.8), and major complications (OR 2.1, 95%, CI: 1.8–2.4), and longer length of stay by 2.3 days. PAN had higher odds of wound (OR 1.5, 95%, CI: 1.3–1.8) and general complications (OR 1.7, 95% CI: 1.5–2.0). Both CS and PAN had higher odds of wound (OR 2.2,95%, CI: 1.5–3.2), general (OR 2.5, 95%, CI: 1.8–3.4), and major complications (OR 2.2, 95%CI: 1.4–3.4), and two days longer length of stay. In conclusion, patients undergoing OVHR that require CS or PAN have a higher independent risk of complications, which increases when the procedures are combined.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Camillo Leonardo Bertoglio ◽  
Lorenzo Morini ◽  
Gisella Barone ◽  
Marianna Maspero ◽  
Bruno Alampi ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim the worldwide increase in morbidly obese patients with complex hernia raises controversies in the choice of the appropriate treatment timing: synchronous bariatric and abdominal wall surgery versus delayed abdominal wall surgery. We report an innovative tailored surgical treatment carried out at our Institution. Material and Methods the approach provided the injection, six weeks before surgery, of 500 international units of botulinum toxin A on either side of the large abdominal wall muscles. Four weeks before surgery pneumoperitoneum was inducted and out-patient daily sessions of progressive insufflation with ambient air were then carried out. Surgery was scheduled 48 days after botulinum injection. Sleeve gastrectomy and simultaneous posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release were performed. Two prosthetic meshes were placed sublay. Results Postoperative superficial surgical site infection was successfully treated with negative pressure wound therapy. At one year follow up no hernia recurrence was recorded while total body weight loss was 31%. Conclusions a delay in ventral hernia repair could worsen quality of life of morbidly obese patients. In such high risk patients, the choice of the best surgical strategy remains controversial. There is great concern in performing bariatric surgery simultaneously to hernia repair, although there is lack of evidence on which is the ideal treatment modality. Synchronous bariatric surgery and complex ventral hernia repair should be approached in high volume centres where a consolidated experience of multidisciplinary team-work is available. Combined botulinum toxin A and preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum administration allow for a safe resolution of loss of domain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document