Should Total Number of Lymph Nodes be Used as a Quality of Care Measure for Stage III Colon Cancer?

2010 ◽  
Vol 251 (1) ◽  
pp. 184-185
Author(s):  
Jiping Wang ◽  
Mahmoud Kulaylat ◽  
James Hassett ◽  
Kelli Bullard Dunn ◽  
Merril Dayton ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 249 (4) ◽  
pp. 559-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiping Wang ◽  
Mahmoud Kulaylat ◽  
Howard Rockette ◽  
James Hassett ◽  
Ashwani Rajput ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3598-3598
Author(s):  
Jun Seok Park ◽  
Soo Yeun Park ◽  
Gyu-Seog Choi ◽  
Hye Jin Kim ◽  
Jong Gwang Kim ◽  
...  

3598 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is recommended to commence within 8 weeks since after surgical resection of stage II or III colon cancer. Results of many retrospective studies showed inferior survival outcomes following delay of AC delay. Moreover, preclinical studies showed that the progression of disseminated cancer cells is profound during the postoperative period. This study is the first prospective trial to evaluate early (≤ 14 days postoperative) AC for patients (pts) with stage III colon cancer. Methods: This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized phase III trial. Pts with pathological stage III colon cancer were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to early AC (starting AC ≤ 14 days after surgery) or conventional AC (starting AC > 14 days after surgery). Pts were recommended to receive 12 cycles of FOLFOX-6 for AC. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. The secondary endpoints were overall survival, adverse events, surgical complication during AC, and patient-reported outcomes (quality of life) during 1 year after surgery. Herein, safety data, chemotherapy delivery, and quality of life are presented. Results: This study randomized 443 pts either early AC arm (221pts) or early AC arm (222 pts) to the during September 2011 to March 2020. 380 pts who received at least one cycle of FOLFOX-6 were included in the safety analysis (192 and 188 in the early and conventional AC arms, respectively). The baseline characteristics of the two groups were well-balanced except for the interval from the surgery to the initial AC. The early and conventional AC arms started their first chemotherapy at median of 13 (4-43 days) and 29 (17-53 days) after surgery (p < 0.001), respectively. No significant differences were seen in the median chemotherapy cycles, AC completion, and relative oxaliplatin dose intensity between groups. AC Completion without any change of dose or schedule delay was seen in 18% and 20% in early and conventional AC arms respectively, while dose reduction or delay was 65% and 61%, respectively. Toxicities of grade 3 or more were seen in 28% in both groups. One patient in the early AC arm underwent an emergent operation for anastomotic leakage on the second day of 5-fluorouracil infusion (postoperative day 14). However, the surgical complication was not seen in any other patient. The scores of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life core 30 questionnaire were similar in both arms at baseline (before starting AC), and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Conclusions: Early AC was safe and did not increase either chemotherapy-related adverse events or surgery-related complications during treatment. Moreover early AC did not reduce the quality of life of the pts during 1 year after surgery. This study continues to follow-up the patients for survival outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT01460589.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 562-562
Author(s):  
Assaf Moore ◽  
Irit Ben-Aharon ◽  
Ofer Purim ◽  
Gali Perl ◽  
Olga Ulitsky ◽  
...  

562 Background: Current staging of patients (pts) with pathological stage III colon cancer is suboptimal; many pts still recur despite unremarkable preoperative staging work-up. We previously reported that early postoperative PET-CT can alter the stage and management of pts with high risk stage III colon cancer in up to 19% of patients. The aim of the current study was to expand the previous one to a larger cohort and to determine the role of early postoperative PET-CT in the general population of stage III colon cancer pts, regardless of their individual risk. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all consecutive pts with stage III colon cancer who underwent early postoperative PET-CT between 2007 and 2016. Demographic and clinicopathological data were collected. Results: 247 pts, 124 (50%) males, with a median age of 66 years (range, 30-92), were included. Pathological stage was IIIA, IIIB and IIIC in 18 (7.3%), 161 (65.1%) and 72 (29.1%) pts, respectively. The median number of lymph nodes retrieved was 15 (range, 6-64) and that of positive lymph nodes was 2 (range, 0-21). High FDG-uptake was observed in 52 (21.0%) pts, including 6 (2.4%) who had clear postoperative changes, 10 (4.0%) who had a false positive abnormal uptake of whom 6 underwent invasive diagnostic procedures. The PET-CT results modified the management of 36 pts (14.5%) who were found to have true positive findings: 30 (12.1%) were proven to have overt metastatic disease and in 6 (2.4%) a second primary was discovered. With the median follow-up of 39.0 months (range 7.2-98.4 months), of the 30 pts found to be metastatic, 10 (33.3%) underwent curative treatments and are currently with no evidence of disease (NED). Updated data, on more patients and a longer follow-up, will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Early postoperative PET-CT changed the staging and treatment of 14.5% of resected stage III pts, and has the potential for early detection of curable metastatic disease. We currently evaluate this strategy and its actual impact in a prospective trial.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 640-640
Author(s):  
Omar M. Rashid ◽  
Karen A. Coyne ◽  
Thomas W. Ross ◽  
David Shibata

640 Background: The Institute of Medicine's report on improving cancer care, along with the evolution of ASCO's Quality Oncology Practice Initiative, has helped to develop process measures into critical quality of cancer care indicators. One such measure relates to "receipt of chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer (CC) within 120 days of diagnosis" and is now being incorporated into processes including hospital accreditation (American College of Surgeons; ACS), managed care contracts and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) quality monitoring. To better understand potential pitfalls related to the strict guidelines of this measure, we sought to evaluate institutional adherence at a tertiary care cancer center and to examine the reasons for non-compliance. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all cases of stage III colon cancer reported at a single institution from 2008 – 2012. Coding for compliance was performed using standard ACS guidelines. Results: A total of 122 eligible cases were identified and consisted of 49 (40.2%) women and 73 (59.8%) men with a median age of 58 (range 32 - 77). Overall, 15 (12.3%) cases were non-compliant with 2 (1.6%) lost to follow up. Of the non-compliant cases, 14 (93.3%) cases did go on to receive chemotherapy while 1 (6.7%) never received adjuvant treatment. Of those receiving delayed treatment, 7 were due to patient-centered factors [e.g. patient timing preference (n=4), request for chemotherapy closer to home (n=2) and lost to follow up (n=1)]. Other reasons included delays at outside facilities (n=4), postoperative complications (n=1) and insurance approval (n=1). In 2 cases, designation of date of diagnosis based on suspicion rather than definitive biopsy contributed to non-compliant status. Conclusions: Our center averaged an annual compliance with the CC adjuvant therapy measure of approximately 90%. Larger scale studies are indicated to determine whether refinements in coding guides that account for patient preferences, clear diagnosis dates and cross-facility care could better reflect quality of care, and also promote improved patient-centered multidisciplinary management.


2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (10) ◽  
pp. 1786
Author(s):  
Erin MacQuarrie ◽  
Thomas Arnason ◽  
Jennette Gruchy ◽  
Sen Yan ◽  
Arik Drucker ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae Hee Pyo ◽  
Seok Hyung Kim ◽  
Sang Yoon Ha ◽  
Seong Hyeon Yun ◽  
Yong Beom Cho ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document