Neither ancient nor modern: Wallis and Barrow on the composition of continua. Part one: Mathematical styles and the composition of continua

John Wallis and Isaac Barrow were key figures in a transitional period in the development of mathematics in early modern England: their work reveals a tension between the emerging algebraic techniques and the more traditional geometric mode of thought. Both men were among the first professional mathematicians in England. Wallis studied at Cambridge, deciphered Royalist codes for Parliament during the Civil War, and was one of the secretaries to the Assembly of Divines at Westminster. He was rewarded for his support of Parliament with the Savilian Professorship of Geometry at Oxford. Barrow was also a student at Cambridge and, in 1660, was appointed Regius Professor of Greek at Trinity College. He subsequently became Professor of Geometry at Gresham College, before finally becoming the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at Cambridge. The work of both Wallis and Barrow was at the forefront of English mathematics in the second half of the seventeenth century. But even though both enjoyed very similar educations and careers, their mathematical techniques were quite different. Wallis’s style is usually considered algebraic, while Barrow’s is considered geometric. At the same time each man’s work exhibited a similar tension between tradition and innovation - between the mathematical ideas inherited from the Greeks and the demands of the new methods and problems.

Author(s):  
Nicholas Popper

Historical study flourished in early modern Europe, as scholars and counselors adapted venerable genres and modes of analysis and devised new methods and techniques. Their works intended to advance political ends by augmenting their readers’ strategic acumen, familiarizing them with recent events, or deciphering broad providential patterns at work. Early modern England witnessed the importation of every significant form of historical work produced in this period, and these methods came to occupy a central, if variegated, place in its political culture. Above all, the interpretive model of ‘politic history’ and the techniques of continental antiquarianism became powerful ways to intervene in English politics, and editions, translations, and adaptations were disseminated by those both endorsing and challenging royal policy. At the same time, other readers plumbed their histories for empirical information, hoping that their mastery of foreign lands would earn them advancement within the regime.


2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 392-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry Stewart

AbstractThe emergence of instrument-making trades in early-modern England tested the power of established guilds. From the seventeenth century, instrument makers were able to exploit growing markets for scientific apparatus and attempted to exploit connections with the Royal Society. Given the growth in both local and international demand, and in new methods of manufacture, instrument makers were frequently able to evade the diminishing power of guilds to police the efforts of the makers.


Author(s):  
Katherine Hill

In the the first part of this article* it was shown that neither John Wallis nor Isaac Barrow fits precisely into the modern or traditional categories commonly used by historians. Yet other kinds of tension between tradition and innovation did exist in the wider intellectual community of early modern England that might have some bearing on the state of mathematics. We therefore need to explore how the opposition between ancient and modern was expressed in the seventeenth century. First, there was the religiously based belief in the decay of nature; supporters of this belief regarded traditional methods to be superior. The defenders of the moderns, on the other hand, did not consider the Bible to rule out contemporary improvements on ancient techniques. But the very idea that knowledge could be advanced, particularly beyond the classical works, was still new and strange in this period.1 Second, the dispute surrounding educational reform included the rejection of traditional educational methods. Social and economic pressures led reformers to propose an increased concern with utility and practical methods, which might increase employment. Once the context of the tension between the supporters of the ancients and the supporters of the moderns has been explored, we can ascertain whether Wallis and Barrow stood on different sides in the conflict, and how this may have have influenced their mathematics.


2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 105-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela McShane

AbstractThis article revisits the “heroic and glamorous language” of recruitment and retention in seventeenth century England through an exploration of the market, medium and message of many hundreds of “military” ballads that were disseminated from London across the country, especially in times of war. These show that military volunteerism among the lower sorts was less surprising and more sophisticated than historians have previously imagined, which suggests the need to reconsider the question of military professionalism among ordinary rank and file soldiers. Furthermore, the common use of the love song as a vehicle for military messages, reveals how regular soldiering became a new vocation for the “lower sorts” in this transitional period for army development. This new “profession” not only marked a direct break from the older system of “estates” which put fighters at the top and workers at the bottom of society, it was negotiating its place within the social structures of household formation in early modern England.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document