On the theory of the Kelvin ship-wave source: the near-field convergent expansion of an integral

The velocity potential of the Kelvin ship-wave source is fundamental in the mathematical theory of the wave resistance of ships, but is difficult to evaluate numerically. We shall be concerned with the integral term F ( x, ρ, ∝ ) = ∫ ∞ -∞ exp {— 1/2 ρ cosh (2 u — i ∝ )} cos ( x cosh u )d u in the source potential, where x and ρ are positive and —1/2 π ≼ ∝ ≼ 1/2 π , which is difficult to evaluate when x and ρ are small. It will be shown here that F ( x, ρ, ∝ ) = 1/2ƒ( x, ρ, ∝ ) + 1/2ƒ( x, ρ, ─∝ ) + 1/2ƒ( ─x , ρ, ∝ ) + ½ƒ( ─x, ρ, ─∝ ), where ƒ( x, ρ, ∝ ) = P 0 ( x, ρ e -i ∝ ) Σ g m ( x, ρ e i ∝ ) c m ( x, ρ e -i ∝ ) + P 1 ( x, ρ e -i ∝ ) Σ g m ( x, ρ e i ∝ ) b m ( x, ρ e -i ∝ ) + Σ g m ( x, ρ e i ∝ ) a m ( x, ρ e -i ∝ ) In this expression each of the functions g m ( x, ρ e i ∝ ), a m ( x, ρ e -i ∝ ), b m ( x, ρ e -i ∝ ), c m ( x, ρ e -i ∝ ), satisfies a simple three-term recurrence relation and tends rapidly to 0 for small x and ρ when m → ∞, and the functions P 0 ( x, ρ e -i ∝ ) and P 1 ( x, ρ e i ∝ ) are simply related to the parabolic cylinder functions D v (ζ) respectively, where ζ = — i x (2 ρ ) -1/2 e 1/2 i ∝ .

The Kelvin ship-wave source is important in the mathematical theory of the wave resistance of ships but its velocity potential is difficult to evaluate numerically. In particular, the integral term F ( x ,ρ,α) = ∫ ∞ -∞ exp{-½ρ cosh (2 u - iα)} cos ( x cosh u ) d u in the source potential is difficult to evaluate when x and ρ are positive and small, and when -½π ≤ α ≤ ½π. In this work we are concerned with the asymptotic expansion of this integral when x 2 /4ρ is large while x and ρ are not large, for which case the asymptotic expansion F ( x ,ρ,α) ~ - π I 0 (½ρ) Y 0 ( x ) - 2π Ʃ ∞ 1 I m (½ρ) Y 2 m ( x ) cos m α in terms of Bessel functions was proposed by Bessho (1964). This expansion has recently been shown to have great computational advantages but has never been proved. (The standard asymptotic theory of integrals, based on Watson’s lemma, is not applicable, and the expansion is not of standard form.) In this paper it is shown that the expansion is valid except near α = ±½π where an additional term is needed.


Author(s):  
Takashi Tsubogo

The ship wave resistance can be evaluated by two alternative methods after solving the boundary value problem. One is the far field method e.g. Havelock’s formula, and another is the near field method based on direct pressure integration over the wetted hull surface. As is well known, there exist considerable discrepancies between wave resistance results by far field method and by near field method. This paper presents a Lagally expression in consistency with Havelock’s formula. In order to derive the Lagally expression, the symmetry of Havelock’s Green function is used in the same manner as Yeung et al (2004). Another expression to examine the relation with water pressure integrations or to ensure physical consistency is also derived by slightly deforming that expression. Some numerical comparisons of wave resistance of Wigley, KCS and KVLCC2 models among by Havelock’s formula, some direct pressure integration methods and present two new near field expressions, are shown to demonstrate consistency numerically.


Author(s):  
Takashi Tsubogo

The ship wave resistance can be estimated by two alternative methods after solving the boundary integral equation. One is the far field method e.g. Havelock’s formula based on momentum conservation in fluid domain, and another is the near field method based on direct pressure integration over the wetted body surface. Nakos and Sclavounos (1994) had shown a new near field expression of ship wave resistance from the momentum conservation law in the fluid domain with linearized free surface condition. Their new expression differs slightly from the traditional near field form. This problem of near field expression is reconsidered in terms of Green’s second identity. After linearization of the free suface condition and some transformation of equations, the present paper will agree with the Nakos and Sclavounos’ near field expression for the ship wave resistance. Some numerical calculations of wave resistance from the far field method and from the near field method are shown using the classical Kelvin sources distributed on the centerplane of thin ship but solving the different boundary integral equation. Numerical results suggest that the problematic run-up square integration along the waterline is to be omitted as a higher order small quantity. If this run-up term is omitted in each method except for far field, the traditional direct pressure integrtaion is equal to the Nakos and Sclavounos’ near field expression.


2004 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1231-1244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduard Amromin ◽  
Svetlana Kovinskaya ◽  
Igor Mizine

1946 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 171-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. Mitra

The object of the present note is to obtain a number of infinite integrals involving Struve functions and parabolic cylinder functions. 1. G. N. Watson(1) has proved thatFrom (1)follows provided that the integral is convergent and term-by-term integration is permissible. A great many interesting particular cases of (2) are easily deducible: the following will be used in this paper.


1983 ◽  
Vol 27 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-33
Author(s):  
Francis Noblesse

A new slender-ship theory of wave resistance is presented. Specifically, a sequence of explicit slender-ship wave-resistance approximations is obtained. These approximations are associated with successive approximations in a slender-ship iterative procedure for solving a new (nonlinear integro-differential) equation for the velocity potential of the flow caused by the ship. The zeroth, first, and second-order slender-ship approximations are given explicitly and examined in some detail. The zeroth-order slender-ship wave-resistance approximation, r(0) is obtained by simply taking the (disturbance) potential, ϕ, as the trivial zeroth-order slender-ship approximation ϕ(0) = 0 in the expression for the Kochin free-wave amplitude function; the classical wave-resistance formulas of Michell [1]2 and Hogner [2] correspond to particular cases of this simple approximation. The low-speed wave-resistance formulas proposed by Guevel [3], Baba [4], Maruo [5], and Kayo [6] are essentially equivalent (for most practical purposes) to the first-order slender-ship low-Froude-number approximation, rlF(1), which is a particular case of the first-order slender-ship approximation r(1): specifically, the first-order slender-ship wave-resistance approximation r(1) is obtained by approximating the potential ϕ in the expression for the Kochin function by the first-order slender-ship potential ϕ1 whereas the low-Froude-number approximation rlF(1) is associated with the zero-Froude-number limit ϕ0(1) of the potentialϕ(1). A major difference between the first-order slender-ship potential ϕ(1) and its zero-Froude-number limit ϕ0(1) resides in the waves that are included in the potential ϕ(1) but are ignored in the zero-Froude-number potential ϕ0(1). Results of calculations by C. Y. Chen for the Wigley hull show that the waves in the potential ϕ(1) have a remarkable effect upon the wave resistance, in particular causing a large phase shift of the wave-resistance curve toward higher values of the Froude number. As a result, the first-order slender-ship wave-resistance approximation in significantly better agreement with experimental data than the low-Froude-number approximation rlF(1) and the approximations r(0) and rM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document