Closing remarks

1977 ◽  
Vol 199 (1134) ◽  
pp. 187-187
Keyword(s):  
World Bank ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Rural Populations ◽  
Complex Interplay ◽  
The World Bank ◽  
The World ◽  
Intractable Problems ◽  
Voluntary Agencies

We have all learned much during these two days, as we have been taking a broader view of the complex interplay of health and economics and development in the rural populations of the world. We are now better able to appreciate the need for an informed multi-disciplinary approach to the multifactorial basis of ill-health and poverty. Just as friction generates heat, and the rubbing together of rough ferrous surfaces produces sparks, so we have seen here a display of multi-professional sparks that should ignite policies and people. And remember Augustine’s phrase. ‘One loving spirit sets another on fire’. We have seen the urgent need to work together if these intractable problems are to be solved. This cooperation will embrace the World Bank and governments; governments and voluntary agencies; international organizations with their flexibility and initiative, and executive bodies like ministries of health; the technical and the cultural; the indigenous and the imported.

The autonomy of international organizations? The analysis of major powers’ influence over the World Bank’s aid policies

2021 ◽  
pp. 223386592110248
Author(s):  
Yooneui Kim ◽  
Youngwan Kim
Keyword(s):  
World Bank ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Development Assistance ◽  
The United States ◽  
Official Development Assistance ◽  
Global Politics ◽  
Major Powers ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The World Bank ◽  
The World

Are international organizations autonomous actors in global politics? This paper investigates whether and how major powers influence the World Bank’s official development assistance policies. Despite the World Bank’s attempts to maintain independence from its member states, we argue that major powers are still influential. Testing this expectation with the data of official development assistance provisions between 1981 and 2017, we find that the World Bank provides a higher amount of official development assistance to the recipient countries that receive a higher amount of such assistance from the major powers such as the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Japan. In addition, the World Bank is prone to provide a higher amount of official development assistance to the recipients that have a similar preference to the major powers. This study sheds light on the relations between major powers and international organizations.

Recognized and Violated by International Law: The Human Rights of the Global Poor

2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 717-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
THOMAS POGGE
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
World Bank ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Customary International Law ◽  
The World Bank ◽  
Institutional Structures ◽  
The World

Various human rights are widely recognized in codified and customary international law. These human rights promise all human beings protection against specific severe harms that might be inflicted on them domestically or by foreigners. Yet international law also establishes and maintains institutional structures that greatly contribute to violations of these human rights: fundamental components of international law systematically obstruct the aspirations of poor populations for democratic self-government, civil rights, and minimal economic sufficiency. And central international organizations, such as the WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank, are designed so that they systematically contribute to the persistence of severe poverty.

scholarly journals Chopping the world into bits: Africa, the World Bank, and the good governance norm

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 332-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Gallagher
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
World Bank ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
The Other ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
The World Bank ◽  
The World

This article explores norms as idealizations, in an attempt to grasp their significance as projects for international organizations. We can think about norms as ‘standards of proper behaviour’. In this sense they are somehow natural, things to be taken for granted, noticed only really when they are absent. We can also think about norms as ‘understandings about what is good and appropriate’. In this sense, norms embody a stronger sense of virtue and an ability to enable progress or improvement. Norms become ideal when they are able to conflate what is good with what is appropriate, standard, or proper. It is when the good becomes ‘natural’ that a norm appears immanent and non-contestable, and so acquires an idealized form.45Along with the other articles in this special issue, I will attempt to challenge some of the complacency surrounding the apparent naturalness and universality of norms employed in international relations.

Trust-Funded Partnership Programmes of the World Bank under the ario

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-148
Author(s):  
Andrea E. Stumpf
Keyword(s):  
International Development ◽  
World Bank ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Fund Flows ◽  
Roles And Responsibilities ◽  
International Partnership ◽  
The World Bank ◽  
The World ◽  
Development Initiatives

This article suggests that the variety and complexity of international partnership programmes, especially those that contract major fund flows, can be sustained only if partners are able to allocate roles and responsibilities amongst themselves. The premise of this article is simple. Lest there be any doubt, agreed terms set forth in signed agreements and adopted partnership documents should be considered ‘rules of the organization’ under the ario, and should be recognized in allocating responsibility among international organizations and other partners in international development initiatives. A practical look at trust-funded partnership programmes involving the World Bank underscores the importance of lex specialis under the Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations, including with respect to claims by third parties. At stake is the viability of such collaborative international development initiatives, which rests on the ability of partners to legitimately set their own terms for acknowledgment by others.

Interactions between International Organizations

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-104
Author(s):  
Henner Gött
Keyword(s):  
World Bank ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Scholarship ◽  
The World Bank ◽  
European Court ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
The World ◽  
Important Field

Interactions between international organizations (‘IOs’) are a ubiquitous and multifaceted phenomenon in global governance, with labour governance being an important field of reference. Such inter-organizational interactions, defined as intended or accidental influence between IOs, can considerably affect the way in which the interacting IOs execute their respective mandates. Depending on the situation, inter-organizational interactions can increase IOs’ outreach and impact, but they can also dilute, divert or thwart their activities and their functioning. Against this background, it is surprising that international legal scholarship has so far shown little interest in the legal dimensions of inter-organizational interactions. In consequence, many central aspects of the law governing such interactions still lay obscure. This article argues that there is a need for international lawyers to examine the phenomenon and the legal implications of inter-organizational interactions in a systematic manner. Using interactions between the International Labour Organization and the UN, the International Maritime Organization, the World Bank and the European Court of Human Rights as examples, this article explores the phenomenon of inter-organizational interactions, extrapolates these interactions’ variety, impact and normative ambivalence, and develops a legal scholarly perspective on them. In doing so, the article expounds the research agenda for a systematic legal analysis of inter-organizational interactions in labour governance and beyond.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document