scholarly journals Olfactory search-image use by a mosquito-eating predator

2010 ◽  
Vol 277 (1697) ◽  
pp. 3173-3178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona R. Cross ◽  
Robert R. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Ethology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona R. Cross ◽  
Robert R. Jackson
Keyword(s):  

Ethology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 111 (7) ◽  
pp. 669-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irit Gazit ◽  
Allen Goldblatt ◽  
Joseph Terkel
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Godfrey

Higher education in the UK has always needed images, especially in the field of art and design, and institutions have built up their own slide libraries to service that demand. Latterly however it is digital images that are being sought by lecturers and students and numerous products are being produced to accommodate this need. Slide librarians need to educate themselves about these new products and update their skills in order to continue to ensure that their specialist knowledge of image use at higher education level is applied by the new developers.


1985 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 1057-1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Chiszar ◽  
Charles W. Radcliffe ◽  
Roy Overstreet ◽  
Thomas Poole ◽  
Thomas Byers

Cottonmouths (Agkistrodon piscivorus) emitted significantly more tongue flicks after striking rodent prey than after seeing, smelling, and (or) detecting thermal cues from rodent prey. This strike-induced chemosensory searching (SICS) persisted for about 70 min. Prey-derived molecules acquired during the strike would not be expected to remain available to the vomeronasal organs for more than 10 min. Hence, the duration of SICS suggests (i) that a central nervous system (CNS) representation of prey is formed as a consequence of the strike and (ii) that this representation or search image has memorylike properties and remains available to guide searching behavior for a longer time than would be expected on the basis of poststrike residuation of chemically induced afference in the vomeronasal system. In experiment II, cottonmouths struck either rodent or fish prey (which were removed immediately after the strike) and 10 min later the snakes were allowed to ingest either a fish or a mouse. When the prey offered for ingestion was the same type as the prey struck, snakes grasped their prey quickly, whereas, in all other conditions, only a few snakes responded quickly and others did so after much longer latencies. It is proposed that CNS representations of fish and mice have some nonoverlapping features and that a disposition to grasp the type of prey that was initially struck endures until these prey-specific features have degraded (presumably through the ordinary process of forgetting).


1989 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 160-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Guilford ◽  
Marian Stamp Dawkins
Keyword(s):  

1989 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 477-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Melcer ◽  
David Chiszar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document