scholarly journals On the figure requisite to maintain the equilibrium of a homogeneous fluid mass that revolves upon an axis

The author enumerates the various steps by which Sir Isaac Newton, M c Laurin, and Laplace have carried the theory of the equilibrium of a revolving fluid very near to perfection, but he observes that they have generally supposed the spheroid to differ but little from a sphere; and he proceeds in the present paper to investigate the figure “by a direct analysis, in which no arbitrary supposition is admitted.” Mr. Ivory thinks it necessary to distinguish carefully two separate cases; the first is when the particles of the fluid do not attract one another, and the second when the particles are endued with attractive powers. These, he says, are plainly two cases that are essentially different from one another; for in the first, a stratum added induces no other change than an increase of pressure caused by the action of the accelerating forces at the surface; but in the second, besides the pressure, a new force is introduced, arising from the mutual attraction between the matter of the stratum and the fluid mass to which it is added.

The theory of the figures of the planets involves two questions perfectly distinct from each other; first, the figure which a mass of matter would assume by the mutual attraction of its particles, combined with a centrifugal force, arising from rotatory motion; and secondly, the force with which a body so formed will attract a particle occupying any proposed situation. The latter is the subject of the present inquiry; and it is also limited to the consideration of homogeneous bodies bounded by finite surfaces of the second order. This subject was first partially treated of by Sir Isaac Newton, who, in determining the attraction of spherical bodies, has also treated of other solids, formed by the rotation of curves round an axis, and of the attractions they exert upon bodies placed in the line of their axes. MacLaurin was the first who determined the attractions that such spheroids of revolutions exert on particles placed anywhere, either in or within their surfaces.


1824 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 85-150 ◽  

The theory of the figure of the earth, as delivered in the Philosophice Naturalis Principia Mathematica , is liable to some objections. In determining the ratio of the axes, the illustri­ous author assumes that the terrestrial meridian is an ellipse, having the greatest diameter in the plane of the equator. M'Laurin afterwards proved, by a most elegant synthetic process of reasoning, that a homogeneous fluid body, possessed of such a figure as Newton supposed, will fulfil all the conditions of equilibrium arising from the attraction of the particles, and a centrifugal force of rotation. In this manner the assumption of Newton was verified; but the theory was still left imperfect, since it is necessary to deter­mine, by a direct investigation, all the figures of a fluid mass that are consistent with the laws of equilibrium, rather than to show that the same laws will be fulfilled in particular in­stances. We are indebted to Legendre for the first demon­stration that a homogeneous fluid body, revolving about an axis, cannot be in equilibrio by the attraction of its particles, unless it have the figure of an oblate elliptical spheroid. The researches of Legendre were rendered more general by Laplace, who gave a complete theory of the figure of the planets, distinguished by that depth and elegance which is so much admired in all his writings. It is assumed, however by the eminent geometers we have mentioned, that the figure of the fluid mass is but little different from a sphere which is a restriction not essential to the problem, but introduced for the sake of overcoming some of the difficulties of the investigation. In the following Paper, the figure of a homo­geneous fluid body, that revolves about an axis, and is in equilibrio by the attraction of its particles, is deduced by a direct analysis in which no arbitrary supposition is admitted. 1. It is necessary to begin this research, with laying down some general properties of the attractions of bodies ; and we cannot better accomplish this end, than by considering the function, which is the sum of all the molecules of a body divided by their respective distances from the attracted point. Conceive any material body to be divided into an indefinitely great number of molecules, one of which is represented by d m ; and having drawn three planes intersecting at right angles within the body, let x,y, z , denote the co-ordinates that determine the position of d m , and a, b, c, those that determine the attracted point: then, if we put r = √ a 2 + b 2 + c 2 f = √( a — x ) 2 + ( b — y ) 2 + ( c — z ) 2 ; r will be the distance of the attracted point from the origin of the co-ordinates, and f that of d m from the attracted point.


1768 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 156-169 ◽  

It is demonstrated by Sir Isaac Newton in the Principia , that it is not the Earth's center, but the common center of gravity of the Earth and Moon, that describes the ecliptic; and that the Earth and Moon revolve in similar ellipses, about their common center of gravity.


Each number of Notes and Records contains a short bibliography of books and articles dealing with the history of the Royal Society or its Fellows which have been noted since the publication of the last number. If Fellows would be good enough to draw the Editor’s attention to omissions these would be added to the list in the next issue. Books Badash, L. (Editor). Rutherford and Boltwood: letters on radioactivity. (Yale studies in the History of Sciences and Medicine, Vol. 4.) New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969. $12.50. Begg, A. C. and Begg, N.C. James Cook and New Zealand . Wellington, N.Z.: A. R. Shearer, 1969. £ 2 5s. Berkeley, E. and Berkeley, Dorothy, S. Dr Alexander Gordon of Charles Town . University of North Carolina Press, 1969. $10.00. Bestcrman, T. Voltaire. London: Longmans, 1969. 8s. Bowden, D. K. Leibniz as a librarian and eighteenth-century librarians Germany . London: University College, 1969. 7s. 6d. Darwin, C. R. Questions about the breeding of animals . Facsim. repr. with an introduction by Sir Gavin Dc Beer. London: Society for the Bibliography of Natural History, 1969. £1 15s. Davis, N. P. Lawrence and Openhimer . London: Cape, 1969. 2s. Dobson, J. John Hunter. Edinburgh & London: E. & S. Livingstone, 1969. £ 2 10s. Eales, N. B. The Cole library of early medicine and zoology . Catalogue of books and pamphlets. Part 1. 1472 to 1800. Oxford: Aldcn Press for the Library, University of Reading, 1969. £$ 5s. Edleston, J. (Editor). Correspondence of Sir Isaac Newton and Professor Cotes . (1830.) (Cass Library of Science Classics. No. 12.) London: Frank Cass, 1969. £ 6 6s. Fothergill, B. Sir William Hamilton . Faber and Faber, 1969. £ 2 10s. French, R. K. Robert Whytt, the soul, and medicine . (Publications of the Wellcome Institute, No. 17.) London: Wellcome Institute of the History of Medicine, 1969. £ 2 5s.


Gendered Ecologies: New Materialist Interpretations of Women Writers in the Long Nineteenth Century is comprised of a diverse collection of essays featuring analyses of literary women writers, ecofeminism, feminist ecocriticism, and the value of the interrelationships that exist among human, nonhuman, and nonliving entities as part of the environs. The book presents a case for the often-disregarded literary women writers of the long nineteenth century, who were active contributors to the discourse of natural history—the diachronic study of participants as part of a vibrant community interconnected by matter. While they were not natural philosophers as in the cases of Sir Isaac Newton, Robert Boyle, and Michael Faraday among others, these women writers did engage in acute observations of materiality in space (e.g., subjects, objects, and abjects), reasoned about their findings, and encoded their discoveries of nature in their literary and artistic productions. The collection includes discussions of the works of influential literary women from the long nineteenth century—Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, Caroline Norton, Charlotte Brontë, George Eliot, Mary Elizabeth Braddon, Jane Johnston Schoolcraft, Margaret Fuller, Susan Fenimore Cooper, Celia Thaxter, Laura Ingalls Wilder, Francis Wright, and Lydia Maria Child—whose multi-directional observations of animate and inanimate objects in the natural domain are based on self-made discoveries while interacting with the environs.


Author(s):  
Robert L. Weber ◽  
Eric Mendoza

Author(s):  
Robert L. Weber ◽  
Eric Mendoza

Author(s):  
Robert L. Weber ◽  
Eric Mendoza

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document