scholarly journals Epidermophyton floccosum: nucleotide sequence analysis and antifungal susceptibility testing of 40 clinical isolates

2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (11) ◽  
pp. 1655-1663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saham Ansari ◽  
Bahram Ahmadi ◽  
Maryam Norouzi ◽  
Zohreh Ansari ◽  
Mohammad Hosein Afsarian ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-98
Author(s):  
Fabio Brito-Santos ◽  
Maria Helena Galdino Figueiredo-Carvalho ◽  
Rowena Alves Coelho ◽  
Jean Carlos Almeida de Oliveira ◽  
Raissa Vieira Monteiro ◽  
...  




2008 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 1062-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Cuenca-Estrella ◽  
Alicia Gomez-Lopez ◽  
M. Olga Gutierrez ◽  
M. Jose Buitrago ◽  
Juan L. Rodriguez-Tudela

ABSTRACT This study evaluated the WIDERYST system, a commercially available computer-assisted image-processing device for the antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. A collection of 90 clinical isolates selected to represent ranges of susceptibilities in vitro as broad as possible was tested. An evaluation compared the results obtained by the new system with those achieved by both the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) microdilution reference procedure and the antifungal susceptibility standard of the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Overall, the agreement and the correlation index between results obtained by the EUCAST method and the WIDERYST system were 89% and 0.84 (P < 0.01), respectively, and agreement and correlation index between data obtained by the CLSI procedure and the WIDERYST system were 90% and 0.86 (P < 0.01), respectively. The system was able to detect amphotericin B-resistant isolates. All Candida sp. isolates with resistance in vitro to azole agents were detected as well. The system misclassified some isolates belonging to the slowly growing genera Dipodascus and Pichia. A total of 2.7% very major errors were detected for fluconazole. The WIDERYST system is an alternative to reference procedures for antifungal susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of yeasts, particularly for Candida and Cryptococcus species.



2007 ◽  
Vol 164 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valda Teixeira Figueiredo ◽  
Daniel de Assis Santos ◽  
Maria Aparecida Resende ◽  
Júnia Soares Hamdan




2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 2099-2113
Author(s):  
Sebastian Gnat ◽  
Dominik Łagowski ◽  
Aneta Nowakiewicz ◽  
Marcelina Osińska ◽  
Łukasz Kopiński

Abstract The major problems in determining the causative factors of the high prevalence of dermatophytoses include the lack of a well-standardized antifungal susceptibility testing method, the low consistency of in vitro and clinical minimal inhibitory concentration values, the high genomic diversity of the population, and the unclear mechanism of pathogenicity. These factors are of particular importance when the disease is recalcitrant and relapses. Herein, we identified and characterized Trichophyton mentagrophytes isolates obtained from therapy-resistant cases in humans and animals. We used genomic diversity analysis of 17 human and 27 animal clinical isolates with the MP-PCR technique, determined their phenotypic enzymatic activity and host range, and performed antifungal susceptibility testing to currently available antifungal drugs from various chemical groups. Genomic diversity values of 35.3% and 33.3% were obtained for clinical isolates from humans and animals, respectively, yet without any relationship to the host species or antifungal drug to which resistance in therapy was revealed. The highest activity of keratinase enzymes was recorded for fox, guinea pig, and human hairs. These hosts can be considered as the main species in the host range of these isolates. A phenyl morpholine derivative, i.e. amorolfine, exhibited superior activity against strains obtained from both humans and animals with the lowest MIC50. Interestingly, high compliance of terbinafine in vitro resistance with clinical problems in the treatment with this substance was shown as well. The high resistance of dermatophytes to drugs is the main cause of the recalcitrance of the infection, whereas the other features of the fungus are less important.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document