scholarly journals Improving Risk Assessment of Miscarriage during Pregnancy with Knowledge Graph Embeddings

Author(s):  
Hegler C. Tissot ◽  
Lucas A. Pedebos

Miscarriages are the most common type of pregnancy loss, mostly occurring in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy due to known factors of different natures. Pregnancy risk assessment aims to quantify evidence in order to reduce such maternal morbidities during pregnancy, and personalized decision support systems are the cornerstone of high-quality, patient-centered care in order to improve diagnosis, treatment selection, and risk assessment. However, the increasing number of patient-level observations and data sparsity requires more effective forms of representing clinical knowledge in order to encode known information that enables performing inference and reasoning. Whereas knowledge embedding representation has been widely explored in the open domain data, there are few efforts for its application in the clinical domain. In this study, we discuss differences among multiple embedding strategies, and we demonstrate how these methods can assist on clinical risk assessment of miscarriage both before and specially in the earlier pregnancy stages. Our experiments show that simple knowledge embedding approaches that utilize domain-specific metadata perform better than complex embedding strategies, although both are able to improve results comparatively to a population probabilistic baseline in both AUPRC, F1-score, and a proposed normalized version of these evaluation metrics that better reflects accuracy for unbalanced datasets.

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jade M Shorter ◽  
Jessica M Atrio ◽  
Courtney A Schreiber

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Pryce ◽  
Amanda Hall

Shared decision-making (SDM), a component of patient-centered care, is the process in which the clinician and patient both participate in decision-making about treatment; information is shared between the parties and both agree with the decision. Shared decision-making is appropriate for health care conditions in which there is more than one evidence-based treatment or management option that have different benefits and risks. The patient's involvement ensures that the decisions regarding treatment are sensitive to the patient's values and preferences. Audiologic rehabilitation requires substantial behavior changes on the part of patients and includes benefits to their communication as well as compromises and potential risks. This article identifies the importance of shared decision-making in audiologic rehabilitation and the changes required to implement it effectively.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33
Author(s):  
James C. Blair

The concept of client-centered therapy (Rogers, 1951) has influenced many professions to refocus their treatment of clients from assessment outcomes to the person who uses the information from this assessment. The term adopted for use in the professions of Communication Sciences and Disorders and encouraged by The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) is patient-centered care, with the goal of helping professions, like audiology, focus more centrally on the patient. The purpose of this paper is to examine some of the principles used in a patient-centered therapy approach first described by de Shazer (1985) named Solution-Focused Therapy and how these principles might apply to the practice of audiology. The basic assumption behind this model is that people are the agents of change and the professional is there to help guide and enable clients to make the change the client wants to make. This model then is focused on solutions, not on the problems. It is postulated that by using the assumptions in this model audiologists will be more effective in a shorter time than current practice may allow.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document