scholarly journals Basolateral amygdala to nucleus accumbens projections differentially mediate flexibility of sign- and goal-tracking rats

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Kochli ◽  
Sara E. Keefer ◽  
Utsav Gyawali ◽  
Donna J Calu

AbstractRats rely on communication between basolateral amygdala (BLA) and nucleus accumbens (NAc) to express lever directed approach in a Pavlovian lever autoshaping (PLA) task that distinguishes sign- and goal-tracking rats. While sign-tracking rats inflexibly respond to cues even after the associated outcome is devalued, goal-tracking rats flexibly suppress conditioned responding during outcome devaluation. Here, we sought to determine whether BLA-NAc communication in sign-trackers drives rigid appetitive approach that is insensitive to manipulations of outcome value. Using a contralateral chemogenetic inactivation design, we injected contralateral BLA and NAc core with inhibitory DREADD (hm4D-mcherry) or control (mcherry) constructs. To determine sign- and goal-tracking groups, we trained rats in five PLA sessions in which brief lever insertion predicts food pellet delivery. We sated rats on training pellets (devalued condition) or chow (valued condition) prior to systemic clozapine injections (0.1 mg/kg) to inactivate BLA and contralateral NAc during two outcome devaluation probe tests, in which we measured lever and foodcup approach. Contralateral BLA-NAc chemogenetic inactivation promoted flexible lever approach in sign-tracking rats, but disrupted flexible food-cup approach in goal-tracking rats. Consistent with a prior BLA-NAc disconnection lesion study, we find contralateral chemogenetic inactivation of BLA and NAc core reduces lever, but not foodcup approach in PLA. Together these findings suggest rigid appetitive associative encoding in BLA-NAc of sign-tracking rats hinders the expression of flexible behavior when outcome value changes.

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Kochli ◽  
Sara E. Keefer ◽  
Utsav Gyawali ◽  
Donna J. Calu

Rats rely on communication between the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and nucleus accumbens (NAc) to express lever directed approach in a Pavlovian lever autoshaping (PLA) task that distinguishes sign- and goal-tracking rats. During PLA, sign-tracking rats preferentially approach an insertable lever cue, while goal-tracking rats approach a foodcup where rewards are delivered. While sign-tracking rats inflexibly respond to cues even after the associated reward is devalued, goal-tracking rats flexibly reduce responding to cues during outcome devaluation. Here, we sought to determine whether BLA–NAc communication, which is necessary for sign, but not goal-tracking, drives a rigid appetitive approach of sign-tracking rats that are insensitive to manipulations of outcome value. Using a contralateral chemogenetic inactivation design, we injected contralateral BLA and NAc core with inhibitory DREADD (hm4Di-mCherry) or control (mCherry) constructs. To determine sign- and goal-tracking groups, we trained rats in five PLA sessions in which brief lever insertion predicts food pellet delivery. We sated rats on training pellets (devalued condition) or chow (valued condition) before systemic clozapine injections (0.1 mg/kg) to inactivate BLA and contralateral NAc during two outcome devaluation probe tests, in which we measured lever and foodcup approach. Contralateral BLA–NAc chemogenetic inactivation promoted a flexible lever approach in sign-tracking rats but disrupted the flexible foodcup approach in goal-tracking rats. Consistent with a prior BLA–NAc disconnection lesion study, we find contralateral chemogenetic inactivation of BLA and NAc core reduces lever, but not the foodcup approach in PLA. Together these findings suggest rigid appetitive associative encoding in BLA–NAc of sign-tracking rats hinders the expression of flexible behavior when outcome value changes.


2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (8) ◽  
pp. 737-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua L. Jones ◽  
Jeremy J. Day ◽  
Brandon J. Aragona ◽  
Robert A. Wheeler ◽  
R. Mark Wightman ◽  
...  

eNeuro ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. ENEURO.0414-18.2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary S. Gillis ◽  
Sara E. Morrison

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara E. Morrison ◽  
Michael A. Bamkole ◽  
Saleem M. Nicola

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-76
Author(s):  
Fengjin CHANG ◽  
Ruisi CUI ◽  
Xinwang LI

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Sladky ◽  
Federica Riva ◽  
Lisa Anna Rosenberger ◽  
Jack van Honk ◽  
Claus Lamm

AbstractCooperation and mutual trust are essential in our society, yet not everybody is trustworthy. In this fMRI study, 62 healthy volunteers performed a repeated trust game, placing trust in a trustworthy or an untrustworthy player. We found that the central amygdala was active during trust behavior planning while the basolateral amygdala was active during outcome evaluation. When planning the trust behavior, central and basolateral amygdala activation was stronger for the untrustworthy player compared to the trustworthy player but only in participants who actually learned to differentiate the trustworthiness of the players. Independent of learning success, nucleus accumbens encoded whether trust was reciprocated. This suggests that learning whom to trust is not related to reward processing in the nucleus accumbens, but rather to engagement of the amygdala. Our study overcomes major empirical gaps between animal models and human neuroimaging and shows how different subnuclei of the amygdala and connected areas orchestrate learning to form different subjective trustworthiness beliefs about others and guide trust choice behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document