scholarly journals APOBEC3A drives acquired resistance to targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideko Isozaki ◽  
Ammal Abbasi ◽  
Naveed Nikpour ◽  
Adam Langenbucher ◽  
Wenjia Su ◽  
...  

AbstractAcquired drug resistance to even the most effective anti-cancer targeted therapies remains an unsolved clinical problem. Although many drivers of acquired drug resistance have been identified1‒6, the underlying molecular mechanisms shaping tumor evolution during treatment are incompletely understood. The extent to which therapy actively drives tumor evolution by promoting mutagenic processes7 or simply provides the selective pressure necessary for the outgrowth of drug-resistant clones8 remains an open question. Here, we report that lung cancer targeted therapies commonly used in the clinic induce the expression of cytidine deaminase APOBEC3A (A3A), leading to sustained mutagenesis in drug-tolerant cancer cells persisting during therapy. Induction of A3A facilitated the formation of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) in cycling drug-treated cells, and fully resistant clones that evolved from drug-tolerant intermediates exhibited an elevated burden of chromosomal aberrations such as copy number alterations and structural variations. Preventing therapy-induced A3A mutagenesis either by gene deletion or RNAi-mediated suppression delayed the emergence of drug resistance. Finally, we observed accumulation of A3A mutations in lung cancer patients who developed drug resistance after treatment with sequential targeted therapies. These data suggest that induction of A3A mutagenesis in response to targeted therapy treatment may facilitate the development of acquired resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer. Thus, suppressing expression or enzymatic activity of A3A may represent a potential therapeutic strategy to prevent or delay acquired resistance to lung cancer targeted therapy.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole M Hermance ◽  
Elizabeth A Crowley ◽  
Conor P Herlihy ◽  
Amity L Manning

AbstractChromosome instability, or CIN, defined as a high frequency of whole chromosome gains and losses, is prevalent in many solid tumors. CIN has been shown to promote intra-tumor heterogeneity and correspond with tumor aggressiveness, drug resistance and tumor relapse. However, whether CIN promotes the acquisition of genomic changes responsible for drug resistance remain unclear. Here we assess the role of CIN in the acquisition of drug resistance in non small cell lung cancer. We show that impairment of centromeric cohesion underlies the generation of whole chromosome segregation errors and CIN in non small cell lung cancer cells. Further, we demonstrate that centromere-specific enhancement of chromosome cohesion strongly suppresses CIN and reduces intra-tumor heterogeneity. We demonstrate that suppression of CIN has no impact on NSCLC cell proliferation in vitro nor in tumor initiation in mouse xenograft models. However, suppression of CIN alters the timing and molecular mechanism that drive acquired drug resistance. These findings suggest mechanisms to suppress CIN may serve as effective co-therapies to limit tumor evolution and sustain drug response.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideko Isozaki ◽  
Ammal Abbasi ◽  
Naveed Nikpour ◽  
Adam Langenbucher ◽  
Wenjia Su ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 030006052095505
Author(s):  
Ming Wu ◽  
Guodai Hong ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
Lina Ye ◽  
Kang Zhang ◽  
...  

Objective Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and primary or acquired resistance do not respond to targeted drugs. We explored whether cancer cells can be cultured from liquid biopsies from patients with primary resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We aimed to predict patients’ responses to drugs according to in vitro drug testing results. Methods Cancer cell cultures were established from the pleural effusion of a patient with TKI-resistant NSCLC using a conditional reprogramming technique. Phenotypic drug sensitivity tests were performed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay. We tested individual drugs and compared the synergistic and inhibitory effects of drug combinations. Results The results of our in vitro sensitivity test using the combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed were correlated with the patient’s response. Conclusion This represents the first successful report of predictive testing for combination therapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant NSCLC and primary TKI resistance. This strategy should be applicable to both chemotherapies and targeted therapies, and it will significantly improve the clinical treatment and management of patients with NSCLC and primary or acquired resistance to targeted therapies, as well as patients lacking targetable mutations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9609-9609
Author(s):  
Elias Makhoul ◽  
Jong Taek Kim ◽  
Wenjuan Zhang ◽  
Jean Raphael Lopategui ◽  
Ani Sarkis Balmanoukian ◽  
...  

9609 Background: Targeted therapy in EGFR and ALK mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been the standard of care for nearly a decade with subsequent FDA approvals for ROS1 and BRAF V600 mutated NSCLC occurring in 2016 and 2017. However, recent studies have shown suboptimal utilization of genomic profiling results in these patients. In 1 recent study of community oncologists, ~70% of EGFR/ALK+ patients received appropriate targeted therapy, while patients with other gene mutations (including BRAF and ROS1) only received targeted therapy ~30% of the time. Left unanswered was what patients were receiving instead and why. Additionally, it is unknown if this finding is generalizable to the academic setting. We aimed to investigate whether in our patient population, NSCLC patients with actionable mutations received associated FDA approved therapies and if not why. Methods: The pathology database was queried for all NSCLC with molecular testing (including qPCR, FISH and NGS) from 2009 to 2019. Patients with sensitizing EGFR, ALK, ROS1 or BRAF mutations that were detected after the first FDA approval for their respective targeted therapies were included for analysis with those lost to follow up subsequently excluded. Basic demographic and clinical variables were collected as well as treatment records. Results: 2160 NSCLC patients were evaluated (2160 EGFR, 1417 ALK, 810 ROS1, 589 BRAF). 468 patients were identified with targetable mutations (411 EGFR, 46 ALK, 5 ROS1, 6 BRAF). No patient had more than 1 targetable mutation. Of those patients, 248 were at an advanced stage and had clinical follow up (202 EGFR, 37 ALK, 4 ROS1, 5 BRAF). Of those patients 197/202 (97.5%), 33/37 (89.2%), 3/4 (75%) and 1/5 (20%) received EGFR, ALK, ROS1 or BRAF targeted therapy respectively. Across biomarkers 14/248 patients (5.6%) did not receive subsequent targeted therapy. 10 patients (5 EGFR, 3 ALK, 1 ROS1 and 1 BRAF) passed away before targeted therapy could be initiated. Physician choice and missed findings accounted for the remaining four cases. Conclusions: The vast majority of advanced NSCLC patients analyzed in this study received appropriate targeted therapy matched to genomic findings. The main reason (~4% of total cases) that patients did not receive therapy was due to rapidly progressive disease and death before it could be initiated. These findings are at odds with those published from the community setting. This may be due to multiple factors, including clinician education, ease of access to targeted therapies across patient populations and incomplete data in the previous study populations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 3941-3943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuliang Liu ◽  
Hongji Yang ◽  
Xingping Ge ◽  
Lingfei Su ◽  
Aifeng Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document