scholarly journals Reexamination of N-terminal domains of Syntaxin-1 in vesicle fusion from central murine synapses

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gülçin Vardar ◽  
Andrea Salazar-Lázaro ◽  
Marisa Brockmann ◽  
Marion Weber-Boyvat ◽  
Sina Zobel ◽  
...  

AbstractSyntaxin-1 (STX1) and Munc18-1 are two requisite components of synaptic vesicular release machinery, so much so synaptic transmission cannot proceed in their absence. They form a tight binary complex through two major binding modes: one through STX1’s N-peptide, the other through STX1’s closed conformation driven by its Habc-domain. However, physiological roles of these two reportedly different binding modes in synapses are still controversial. Here we characterized the roles of STX1’s N-peptide, Habc-domain, and open conformation with and without N-peptide deletion using our STX1-null mouse model system and exogenous reintroduction of STX1A mutants. We show, on the contrary to the general view, that the Habc-domain is absolutely required and N-peptide is dispensable for synaptic transmission. However, STX1’s N-peptide plays a regulatory role, particularly in the Ca2+-sensitivity and the short-term plasticity of vesicular release, whereas STX1’s open conformation governs the vesicle fusogenicity. Strikingly, we also show that neurotransmitter release still proceeds when both the interaction modes between STX1 and Munc18-1 are presumably intervened together, necessitating a refinement of the conceptualization of STX1–Munc18-1 interaction.

eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gülçin Vardar ◽  
Andrea Salazar-Lázaro ◽  
Marisa M Brockmann ◽  
Marion Weber-Boyvat ◽  
Sina Zobel ◽  
...  

Syntaxin-1 (STX1) and Munc18-1 are two requisite components of synaptic vesicular release machinery, so much so synaptic transmission cannot proceed in their absence. They form a tight complex through two major binding modes: through STX1's N-peptide and through STX's closed conformation driven by its Habc- domain. However, physiological roles of these two reportedly different binding modes in synapses are still controversial. Here we characterized the roles of STX1's N-peptide, Habc-domain, and open conformation with and without N-peptide deletion using our STX1-null mouse model system and exogenous reintroduction of STX1A mutants. We show, on the contrary to the general view, that the Habc-domain is absolutely required and N-peptide is dispensable for synaptic transmission. However, STX1A's N-peptide plays a regulatory role, particularly in the Ca2+-sensitivity and the short-term plasticity of vesicular release, whereas STX1's open-conformation governs the vesicle fusogenicity. Strikingly, we also show neurotransmitter release still proceeds when the two interaction modes between STX1A and Munc18-1 are presumably intervened, necessitating a refinement of the conceptualization of STX1A-Munc18-1 interaction.


Neuron ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 539-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Pan ◽  
Robert S. Zucker

2008 ◽  
Vol 174 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin D. Haustein ◽  
Thomas Reinert ◽  
Annika Warnatsch ◽  
Bernhard Englitz ◽  
Beatrice Dietz ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. V. Storozhuk ◽  
S. Yu. Ivanova ◽  
P. G. Kostyuk

2004 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
MATTHEW A. XU-FRIEDMAN ◽  
WADE G. REGEHR

Xu-Friedman, Matthew A., and Wade G. Regehr. Structural Contributions to Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity. Physiol Rev 84: 69–85, 2004; 10.1152/physrev.00016.2003.—Synaptic ultrastructure is critical to many basic hypotheses about synaptic transmission. Various aspects of synaptic ultrastructure have also been implicated in the mechanisms of short-term plasticity. These forms of plasticity can greatly affect synaptic strength during ongoing activity. We review the evidence for how synaptic ultrastructure may contribute to facilitation, depletion, saturation, and desensitization.


2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 2020-2023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory O. Hjelmstad

Glutamate synapses in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) display asynchronous release in response to trains of stimulation. However, it is unclear what role this asynchronous release plays in synaptic transmission in this nucleus. This process was studied, specifically looking at the interaction between short-term depression and asynchronous release. These results indicate that synchronous and asynchronous release do not compete for a depleted readily releasable pool of vesicles.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heike Stein ◽  
Joao Barbosa ◽  
Albert Compte

Alterations in neuromodulation or synaptic transmission in biophysical attractor network models, as proposed by the dominant dopaminergic and glutamatergic theories of schizophrenia, successfully mimic working memory (WM) deficits in people with schizophrenia (PSZ). Yet, multiple, often opposing circuit mechanisms can lead to the same behavioral patterns in these network models. Here, we critically revise the computational and experimental literature that links NMDAR hypofunction to WM precision loss in PSZ. We show in network simulations that currently available experimental evidence cannot set apart competing mechanistic accounts, and critical points to resolve are firing rate tuning and shared noise modulations by E/I ratio alterations through NMDAR blockade, and possible concomitant deficits in short-term plasticity. We argue that these concerted experimental and computational efforts will lead to a better understanding of the neurobiology underlying cognitive deficits in PSZ.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virág T. Takács ◽  
Csaba Cserép ◽  
Dániel Schlingloff ◽  
Balázs Pósfai ◽  
András Szőnyi ◽  
...  

SummaryThe basal forebrain cholinergic system is widely assumed to control cortical functions via non-synaptic transmission of a single neurotransmitter, acetylcholine. Yet, using immune-electron tomographic, molecular anatomical, optogenetic and physiological techniques, we find that mouse hippocampal cholinergic terminals invariably establish synapses and their vesicles dock at synapses only. We demonstrate that these synapses do not co-release but co-transmit GABA and acetylcholine via different vesicles, whose release is triggered by distinct calcium channels. This co-transmission evokes fast composite postsynaptic potentials, which are mutually cross-regulated by presynaptic auto-receptors and display different short-term plasticity. The GABAergic component alone effectively suppresses hippocampal sharp wave-ripples and epileptiform activity. The synaptic nature of the forebrain cholinergic system with differentially regulated, fast, GABAergic and cholinergic co-transmission suggests a hitherto unrecognized level of synaptic control over cortical states. This novel model of hippocampal cholinergic neurotransmission could form the basis for alternative pharmacotherapies after cholinergic deinnervation seen in neurodegenerative disorders.Supplementary materials are attached after the main text.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document