scholarly journals Hippocampal disinhibition reduces contextual and elemental fear conditioning while sparing the acquisition of latent inhibition

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart A Williams ◽  
Miriam Gwilt ◽  
Rebecca Hock ◽  
Charlotte Taylor ◽  
Joanna Loayza ◽  
...  

Hippocampal neural disinhibition, i.e. reduced GABAergic inhibition, is a key feature of schizophrenia pathophysiology. The hippocampus is an important part of the neural circuitry that controls fear conditioning and can also modulate prefrontal and striatal mechanisms, including dopamine signalling, which play a role in salience modulation. Therefore, hippocampal neural disinhibition may contribute to impairments in fear conditioning and salience modulation reported in schizophrenia. To test this hypothesis, we examined the effect of ventral hippocampus (VH) disinhibition in male rats on fear conditioning and salience modulation, as reflected by latent inhibition (LI), in a conditioned emotional response procedure (CER). A flashing light was used as the conditioned stimulus (CS) and conditioned suppression was used to index conditioned fear. In Experiment 1, VH disinhibition via infusion of the GABA-A receptor antagonist picrotoxin prior to CS pre-exposure and conditioning markedly reduced fear conditioning to both the CS and context; LI was evident in saline-infused controls, but could not be detected in picrotoxin-infused rats due to the low level of fear conditioning to the CS. In Experiment 2, VH picrotoxin infusions prior to CS pre-exposure only did not affect the acquisition of fear conditioning or LI. Together, these findings indicate that VH neural disinhibition disrupts contextual and elemental fear conditioning, without affecting the acquisition of LI. The disruption of fear conditioning resembles aversive conditioning deficits reported in schizophrenia and may reflect disruption of neural processing within the hippocampus and its projection sites.

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1649-1660 ◽  
Author(s):  
AJD Nelson ◽  
KE Thur ◽  
CA Marsden ◽  
HJ Cassaday

Latent inhibition (LI) is demonstrated when non-reinforced pre-exposure to a to-be-conditioned stimulus retards later learning. Learning is similarly retarded in overshadowing, in this case using the relative intensity of competing cues to manipulate associability. Electrolytic/excitotoxic lesions to shell accumbens (NAc) and systemic amphetamine both reliably abolish LI. Here a conditioned emotional response procedure was used to demonstrate LI and overshadowing and to examine the role of dopamine (DA) within NAc. Experiment 1 showed that LI but not overshadowing was abolished by systemic amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg i.p.). In Experiment 2, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) was used to lesion DA terminals within NAc: both shell- and core- (plus shell-)lesioned rats showed normal LI and overshadowing. Experiment 3 compared the effects of amphetamine microinjected at shell and core coordinates prior to conditioning: LI, but not overshadowing, was abolished by 10.0 but not 5.0 µg/side amphetamine injected in core but not shell NAc. These results suggest that the abolition of LI produced by NAc shell lesions is not readily reproduced by regionally restricted DA depletion within NAc; core rather than shell NAc mediates amphetamine-induced abolition of LI; overshadowing is modulated by different neural substrates.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 469-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mykel A Robble ◽  
Isaiah L Holloway ◽  
Elysia Ridener ◽  
Chelsea J Webber ◽  
S Barak Caine ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Tobacco use is prevalent in individuals who are routinely exposed to stress. However, little is known about how nicotine affects responses to trauma. We examined in rats how nicotine exposure affects fear conditioning, a procedure often used to study stress-related psychiatric illness. Methods We examined 2 methods of nicotine exposure: self-administration, modeling voluntary use, and experimenter-programmed subcutaneous administration, modeling medicinal administration (nicotine patch). For self-administered nicotine, rats trained to self-administer nicotine i.v. were fear conditioned (via light cue preceding foot-shock) either immediately after a 12-hour self-administration session or 12 hours later during a period with somatic signs of nicotine withdrawal. For experimenter-delivered nicotine, rats were conditioned after 1–21 days of nicotine delivered by programmable (12 hours on) subcutaneous mini-pumps. Tests to evaluate acoustic startle responses to the conditioning environment (context-potentiated startle) and in the presence or absence of the light cue (fear-potentiated startle) occurred after a 10-day period. Results Rats fear conditioned immediately after nicotine self-administration showed reduced responses to the shock-associated context, whereas those trained during nicotine withdrawal showed exaggerated responses. Experimenter-programmed nicotine produced effects qualitatively similar to those seen with self-administered nicotine. Conclusions Self-administration or experimenter-programmed delivery of nicotine immediately before exposure to aversive events can reduce conditioned fear responses. In contrast, exposure to aversive events during nicotine withdrawal exacerbates fear responses. These studies raise the possibility of developing safe and effective methods to deliver nicotine or related drugs to mitigate the effects of stress while also highlighting the importance of preventing withdrawal in nicotine-dependent individuals.


1978 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 839-845
Author(s):  
Vincent J. Monastra ◽  
David A. Sisemore

The rate of reacquisition of a conditioned emotional response (conditioned suppression) to visual and auditory stimuli after extinction to the stimuli individually or in compound was investigated to assess the relative efficacy of “simple”- and “compound”-extinction procedures in the elimination of conditioned fear in rats. Results indicated that compound-extinction procedures significantly retarded reacquisition of fear to stimuli of low associative strength and tended to facilitate the re-establishment of fear to stimuli of high associative strength. Also, it was noted that following compound extinction the degree of “retardation” or “acceleration” of fear reacquisition tended to increase with the difference between the associative strengths of the two stimuli extinguished in compound. Over-all, current findings were consistent with theoretical deductions derived from the Rescorla-Wagner learning theory and the implications for developing a more efficacious fear-elimination technique based on a specific learning theory were discussed.


2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liana Lins Melo ◽  
Elenice A. de Moraes Ferrari ◽  
Nancy Airoldi Teixeira ◽  
Guy Sandner

This work evaluated the influence of chronic mild stress on latent inhibition (LI) in rats, using a conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure. Rats were assigned to four groups: a non pre-exposed control group (NPC), a non pre-exposed stressed group (NPS), a preexposed control group (PC), and a pre-exposed stressed group (PS). Stressed animals were submitted to a chronic mild stress (CMS) regimen for three weeks. The off-baseline conditioned emotional response procedure had four phases: licking response training, tone- shock conditioning, retraining, and testing. Conditioning consisted of 2 tone (30 s) and shock (0.5 s) associations. Tone-shock conditioning evidenced by NPS and NPC groups suggests that stress did not interfere with the expression of a conditioned emotional response. Pre-exposure was carried out using 6 tones (30 s) during 2 sessions before conditioning. Prior exposure to the tone resulted in a decrease in learning that was greater in stressed animals. The results indicate an increase in latent inhibition induced by chronic mild stress. Such LI potentiation after CMS may be related to dopamine (DA) neurotransmission reduction in the central nervous system.


2000 ◽  
Vol 117 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 127-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debby Van Dam ◽  
Rudi D'Hooge ◽  
Ehud Hauben ◽  
Edwin Reyniers ◽  
Ilse Gantois ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document