scholarly journals Coordinated multivoxel coding beyond univariate effects is not likely to be observable in fMRI data

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mansooreh Pakravan ◽  
Ali Ghazizadeh

Simultaneous recording of activity across brain regions can contain additional information compared to regional recordings done in isolation. In particular, multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) across voxels has been interpreted as evidence for distributed coding of cognitive or sensorimotor processes beyond what can be gleaned from a collection of univariate responses (UVR) using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Here, we argue that regardless of patterns revealed, conventional MVPA is merely a decoding tool with increased sensitivity arising from considering a large number of 'weak classifiers' (i.e. single voxels) in higher dimensions. We propose instead that 'real' multivoxel coding should result in changes in higher-order statistics across voxels between conditions such as second-order multivariate responses (sMVR). Surprisingly, analysis of conditions with robust multivariate responses (MVR) revealed by MVPA failed to show significant sMVR in two species (humans and macaques). Further analysis showed that while both MVR and sMVR can be readily observed in the spiking activity of neuronal populations, the slow and nonlinear hemodynamic coupling and low spatial resolution of fMRI activations make the observation of higher-order statistics between voxels highly unlikely. These results reveal inherent limitations of fMRI signals for studying coordinated coding across voxels. Together, these findings suggest that care should be taken in interpreting significant MVPA results as representing anything beyond a collection of univariate effects.

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingting Guo ◽  
Yining Zhang ◽  
Yanfang Xue ◽  
Lishan Qiao ◽  
Dinggang Shen

Brain functional network (BFN) has become an increasingly important tool to explore individual differences and identify neurological/mental diseases. For estimating a “good” BFN (with more discriminative information for example), researchers have developed various methods, in which the most popular and simplest is Pearson's correlation (PC). Despite its empirical effectiveness, PC only encodes the low-order (second-order) statistics between brain regions. To model high-order statistics, researchers recently proposed to estimate BFN by conducting two sequential PCs (denoted as PC2 in this paper), and found that PC2-based BFN can provide additional information for group difference analysis. This inspires us to think about (1) what will happen if continuing the correlation operation to construct much higher-order BFN by PCn (n>2), and (2) whether the higher-order correlation will result in stronger discriminative ability. To answer these questions, we use PCn-based BFNs to predict individual differences (Female vs. Male) as well as identify subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from healthy controls (HCs). Through experiments, we have the following findings: (1) with the increase of n, the discriminative ability of PCn-based BFNs tends to decrease; (2) fusing the PCn-based BFNs (n>1) with the PC1-based BFN can generally improve the sensitivity for MCI identification, but fail to help the classification accuracy. In addition, we empirically find that the sequence of BFN adjacency matrices estimated by PCn (n = 1,2,3,⋯ ) will converge to a binary matrix with elements of ± 1.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (15) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
J.M. Sierra-Fernández ◽  
J.J. González De La Rosa ◽  
A. Agüera-Pérez ◽  
J.C. Palomares Salas ◽  
O. Florencias-Oliveros

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document