scholarly journals Deciphering hybrid larch reaction norms using random regression

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Marchal ◽  
Carl D. Schlichting ◽  
Rémy Gobin ◽  
Philippe Balandier ◽  
Frédéric Millier ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe link between phenotypic plasticity and heterosis is a broad fundamental question, with stakes in breeding. We report a case-study evaluating temporal series of wood ring traits of hybrid larch (Larix decidua×L. kaempferiand reciprocal) in relation to soil water availability. Growth rings record the tree plastic responses to past environmental conditions, and we used random regressions to estimate the reaction norms of ring width and wood density with respect to water availability. We investigated the role of phenotypic plasticity on the construction of hybrid larch heterosis and on the expression of its quantitative genetic parameters. The data came from an intra-/interspecific diallel mating design between both parental species. Progenies were grown in two environmentally contrasted sites, in France. Ring width plasticity with respect to water availability was confirmed, as all three taxa produced narrower rings under the lowest water availability. Hybrid larch appeared to be the most plastic taxon as its superiority over its parental species increased with increasing water availability. Despite the low heritabilities of the investigated traits, we found that the quantitative genetic parameters varied along the water availability gradient. Finally, by means of a complementary simulation, we demonstrated that random regression can be applied to model the reaction norms of non-repeated records of phenotypic plasticity bound by a family structure. Random regression is a powerful tool for the modeling of reaction norms in various contexts, especially perennial species.


2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 485-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon E. Brommer

Abstract Individual-based studies allow quantification of phenotypic plasticity in behavioural, life-history and other labile traits. The study of phenotypic plasticity in the wild can shed new light on the ultimate objectives (1) whether plasticity itself can evolve or is constrained by its genetic architecture, and (2) whether plasticity is associated to other traits, including fitness (selection). I describe the main statistical approach for how repeated records of individuals and a description of the environment (E) allow quantification of variation in plasticity across individuals (IxE) and genotypes (GxE) in wild populations. Based on a literature review of life-history and behavioural studies on plasticity in the wild, I discuss the present state of the two objectives listed above. Few studies have quantified GxE of labile traits in wild populations, and it is likely that power to detect statistically significant GxE is lacking. Apart from the issue of whether it is heritable, plasticity tends to correlate with average trait expression (not fully supported by the few genetic estimates available) and may thus be evolutionary constrained in this way. Individual-specific estimates of plasticity tend to be related to other traits of the individual (including fitness), but these analyses may be anti-conservative because they predominantly concern stats-on-stats. Despite the increased interest in plasticity in wild populations, the putative lack of power to detect GxE in such populations hinders achieving general insights. I discuss possible steps to invigorate the field by moving away from simply testing for presence of GxE to analyses that ‘scale up’ to population level processes and by the development of new behavioural theory to identify quantitative genetic parameters which can be estimated.



Evolution ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 2411-2426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie V. Stopher ◽  
Craig A. Walling ◽  
Alison Morris ◽  
Fiona E. Guinness ◽  
Tim H. Clutton‐Brock ◽  
...  


Evolution ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1051-1067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph D. DiBattista ◽  
Kevin A. Feldheim ◽  
Dany Garant ◽  
Samuel H. Gruber ◽  
Andrew P. Hendry


Evolution ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 1083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia C. Bennington ◽  
James B. McGraw


Crop Science ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. cropsci2005.0098 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adel H. Abdel-Ghani ◽  
Heiko K. Parzies ◽  
Salvatore Ceccarelli ◽  
Stefania Grando ◽  
Hartwig H. Geiger


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Marchal ◽  
Carl D. Schlichting ◽  
Rémy Gobin ◽  
Philippe Balandier ◽  
Frédéric Millier ◽  
...  


Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 155 (4) ◽  
pp. 1961-1972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart C Thomas ◽  
William G Hill

Abstract Previous techniques for estimating quantitative genetic parameters, such as heritability in populations where exact relationships are unknown but are instead inferred from marker genotypes, have used data from individuals on a pairwise level only. At this level, families are weighted according to the number of pairs within which each family appears, hence by size rather than information content, and information from multiple relationships is lost. Estimates of parameters are therefore not the most efficient achievable. Here, Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques have been used to partition the population into complete sibships, including, if known, prior knowledge of the distribution of family sizes. These pedigrees have then been used with restricted maximum likelihood under an animal model to estimate quantitative genetic parameters. Simulations to compare the properties of parameter estimates with those of existing techniques indicate that the use of sibship reconstruction is superior to earlier methods, having lower mean square errors and showing nonsignificant downward bias. In addition, sibship reconstruction allows the estimation of population allele frequencies that account for the relationships within the sample, so prior knowledge of allele frequencies need not be assumed. Extensions to these techniques allow reconstruction of half sibships when some or all of the maternal genotypes are known.





2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. I. G. Haussmann ◽  
D. E. Hess ◽  
B. V. S. Reddy ◽  
S. Z. Mukuru ◽  
M. Kayentao ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document