scholarly journals The influence of task outcome on implicit motor learning

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyosub Kim ◽  
Darius Parvin ◽  
Richard Ivry

Recent studies have demonstrated that task success signals can modulate learning during sensorimotor adaptation tasks, primarily through engaging explicit processes. Here we examine the influence of task outcome on implicit adaptation, using a reaching task in which adaptation is induced by feedback that is not contingent on actual performance. We imposed an invariant perturbation (rotation) on the feedback cursor while varying the target size. In this way, the cursor either hit or missed the target, with the former producing a marked attenuation of implicit motor learning. We explored different computational architectures that might account for how task outcome information interacts with implicit adaptation. The results fail to support an architecture in which adaptation operates in parallel with a model-free operant reinforcement process. Rather, task outcome may serve as a gain on implicit adaptation or provide a distinct error signal for a second model-based process, in addition to implicit adaptation.

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyosub E Kim ◽  
Darius E Parvin ◽  
Richard B Ivry

Recent studies have demonstrated that task success signals can modulate learning during sensorimotor adaptation tasks, primarily through engaging explicit processes. Here, we examine the influence of task outcome on implicit adaptation, using a reaching task in which adaptation is induced by feedback that is not contingent on actual performance. We imposed an invariant perturbation (rotation) on the feedback cursor while varying the target size. In this way, the cursor either hit or missed the target, with the former producing a marked attenuation of implicit motor learning. We explored different computational architectures that might account for how task outcome information interacts with implicit adaptation. The results fail to support an architecture in which adaptation operates in parallel with a model-free operant reinforcement process. Rather, task outcome may serve as a gain on implicit adaptation or provide a distinct error signal for a second, independent implicit learning process.Editorial note: This article has been through an editorial process in which the authors decide how to respond to the issues raised during peer review. The Reviewing Editor's assessment is that all the issues have been addressed (<xref ref-type="decision-letter" rid="SA1">see decision letter</xref>).


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Femke van Abswoude ◽  
Remo Mombarg ◽  
Wouter de Groot ◽  
Gwennyth Eileen Spruijtenburg ◽  
Bert Steenbergen

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer E. Ruttle ◽  
Bernard Marius ’t Hart ◽  
Denise Y. P. Henriques

AbstractIn motor learning, the slow development of implicit learning is traditionally taken for granted. While much is known about training performance during adaptation to a perturbation in reaches, saccades and locomotion, little is known about the time course of the underlying implicit processes during normal motor adaptation. Implicit learning is characterized by both changes in internal models and state estimates of limb position. Here, we measure both as reach aftereffects and shifts in hand localization in our participants, after every training trial. The observed implicit changes were near asymptote after only one to three perturbed training trials and were not predicted by a two-rate model’s slow process that is supposed to capture implicit learning. Hence, we show that implicit learning is much faster than conventionally believed, which has implications for rehabilitation and skills training.


2019 ◽  
Vol 696 ◽  
pp. 33-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ippei Nojima ◽  
Tatsunori Watanabe ◽  
Tomoya Gyoda ◽  
Hisato Sugata ◽  
Takashi Ikeda ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 77-96
Author(s):  
Rich S.W. Masters ◽  
Tina van Duijn ◽  
Liis Uiga

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S383-S384
Author(s):  
A. Tereszko ◽  
A. Chrobak ◽  
K. Siuda-Krzywicka ◽  
Z. Sołtys ◽  
M. Siwek ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 648-651
Author(s):  
Manasi Wali

Motor memories become resistant to interference by the process of consolidation, which leads to long-term retention. Studies have shown involvement of the somatosensory cortex in motor learning-related plasticity, but not directly in motor memory consolidation. This Neuro Forum article reviews evidence from a continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS) study by Kumar and colleagues (Kumar N, Manning TF, Ostry DJ. PLoS Biol 17: e3000469, 2019) that demonstrates the role of somatosensory, rather than motor, cortex in human motor memory consolidation during implicit motor learning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document