scholarly journals Neuroinflammation and protein aggregation co-localize across the frontotemporal dementia spectrum

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Richard Bevan-Jones ◽  
Thomas E Cope ◽  
P Simon Jones ◽  
Luca Passamonti ◽  
Young T Hong ◽  
...  

AbstractThe clinical syndromes of frontotemporal dementia are clinically and neuropathologically heterogeneous, but processes such as neuroinflammation may be common across the disease spectrum. We investigated how neuroinflammation relates to the aggregation of Tau and TDP-43 in frontotemporal dementia, and to the heterogeneity of clinical disease. We used positron emission tomography in vivo with (a) [11C]PK-11195, a marker of activated microglia and a proxy index of neuroinflammation, and (b) [18F]AV-1451, a radioligand with increased binding to pathologically affected regions in tauopathies and diseases associated with TDP-43 protein aggregation, and which is used as a surrogate marker of non-β-amyloid protein aggregation. We assessed 31 patients with frontotemporal dementia (10 with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, 11 with the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia and 10 with the non-fluent variant of primary progressive aphasia), 28 of whom underwent both [18F]AV-1451 and [11C]PK-11195 PET, and matched controls (14 for [18F]AV-1451 and 15 for [11C]PK-11195). We used univariate region-of-interest analyses, and multivariate analysis of the distribution of binding that explicitly control for individual differences in ligand affinity for TDP-43 and different Tau isoforms. We found differences between patients and controls in frontotemporal regions for both neuroinflammation and protein aggregation, and a strong positive correlation between these two processes in all disease groups. Despite this regional co-localisation, the multivariate distribution of [11C]PK-11195 binding related better to clinical heterogeneity than did the distribution of [18F]AV-1451: distinct spatial modes of neuroinflammation were associated with different frontotemporal dementia syndromes and supported accurate group classification of participants. These in vivo findings indicate a close association between neuroinflammation and protein aggregation in frontotemporal dementia. The inflammatory component may be important in shaping the clinical and neuropathological patterns of the diverse clinical syndromes of frontotemporal dementia.

Brain ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 143 (3) ◽  
pp. 1010-1026 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Richard Bevan-Jones ◽  
Thomas E Cope ◽  
P Simon Jones ◽  
Sanne S Kaalund ◽  
Luca Passamonti ◽  
...  

Abstract The clinical syndromes of frontotemporal dementia are clinically and neuropathologically heterogeneous, but processes such as neuroinflammation may be common across the disease spectrum. We investigated how neuroinflammation relates to the localization of tau and TDP-43 pathology, and to the heterogeneity of clinical disease. We used PET in vivo with (i) 11C-PK-11195, a marker of activated microglia and a proxy index of neuroinflammation; and (ii) 18F-AV-1451, a radioligand with increased binding to pathologically affected regions in tauopathies and TDP-43-related disease, and which is used as a surrogate marker of non-amyloid-β protein aggregation. We assessed 31 patients with frontotemporal dementia (10 with behavioural variant, 11 with the semantic variant and 10 with the non-fluent variant), 28 of whom underwent both 18F-AV-1451 and 11C-PK-11195 PET, and matched control subjects (14 for 18F-AV-1451 and 15 for 11C-PK-11195). We used a univariate region of interest analysis, a paired correlation analysis of the regional relationship between binding distributions of the two ligands, a principal component analysis of the spatial distributions of binding, and a multivariate analysis of the distribution of binding that explicitly controls for individual differences in ligand affinity for TDP-43 and different tau isoforms. We found significant group-wise differences in 11C-PK-11195 binding between each patient group and controls in frontotemporal regions, in both a regions-of-interest analysis and in the comparison of principal spatial components of binding. 18F-AV-1451 binding was increased in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia compared to controls in the temporal regions, and both semantic variant primary progressive aphasia and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia differed from controls in the expression of principal spatial components of binding, across temporal and frontotemporal cortex, respectively. There was a strong positive correlation between 11C-PK-11195 and 18F-AV-1451 uptake in all disease groups, across widespread cortical regions. We confirmed this association with post-mortem quantification in 12 brains, demonstrating strong associations between the regional densities of microglia and neuropathology in FTLD-TDP (A), FTLD-TDP (C), and FTLD-Pick's. This was driven by amoeboid (activated) microglia, with no change in the density of ramified (sessile) microglia. The multivariate distribution of 11C-PK-11195 binding related better to clinical heterogeneity than did 18F-AV-1451: distinct spatial modes of neuroinflammation were associated with different frontotemporal dementia syndromes and supported accurate classification of participants. These in vivo findings indicate a close association between neuroinflammation and protein aggregation in frontotemporal dementia. The inflammatory component may be important in shaping the clinical and neuropathological patterns of the diverse clinical syndromes of frontotemporal dementia.


Author(s):  
Andrea G. Alioto ◽  
Christie C. Mead ◽  
Alicia B. Vanden Bussche Jantz ◽  
Adam M. Staffaroni ◽  
Joel H. Kramer

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a progressive neurological syndrome with diverse clinical presentations and underlying pathologies. FTD is a common cause of dementia, particularly among individuals younger than age 65 years. The three core FTD syndromes are behavioral variant FTD, semantic variant primary progressive aphasia, and nonfluent variant primary progressive aphasia. Neuropsychiatric symptoms and language difficulties are common in FTD, but the heterogeneity of clinical presentations poses significant challenges that can impact accurate diagnosis and patient care. A comprehensive clinical assessment involving the evaluation of cognition, socioemotional functioning, neuroimaging, and other in vivo biomarkers assists with early diagnosis and treatment planning. As the understanding of genetic risk factors and the molecular basis for FTD improves, promising pharmacological therapies are being developed. This chapter summarizes the clinically relevant findings typically seen in each of the three FTD subtypes. It reviews the spectrum of underlying pathological and genetic substrates, addresses common diagnostic challenges, and summarize best practices associated with management of FTD.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley T. Peet ◽  
Salvatore Spina ◽  
Nidhi Mundada ◽  
Renaud La Joie

AbstractFrontotemporal dementia encompasses a group of clinical syndromes defined pathologically by degeneration of the frontal and temporal lobes. Historically, these syndromes have been challenging to diagnose, with an average of about three years between the time of symptom onset and the initial evaluation and diagnosis. Research in the field of neuroimaging has revealed numerous biomarkers of the various frontotemporal dementia syndromes, which has provided clinicians with a method of narrowing the differential diagnosis and improving diagnostic accuracy. As such, neuroimaging is considered a core investigative tool in the evaluation of neurodegenerative disorders. Furthermore, patterns of neurodegeneration correlate with the underlying neuropathological substrates of the frontotemporal dementia syndromes, which can aid clinicians in determining the underlying etiology and improve prognostication. This review explores the advancements in neuroimaging and discusses the phenotypic and pathologic features of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, semantic variant primary progressive aphasia, and nonfluent variant primary progressive aphasia, as seen on structural magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography.


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 89-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Negar Moheb ◽  
Mario F. Mendez ◽  
Sarah A. Kremen ◽  
Edmond Teng

Background: Deficits in instrumental activities of daily living (ADLs) may be more prominent in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) than in nonfluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) or semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA). It is uncertain whether frontotemporal dementia (FTD) subgroups exhibit different patterns and/or predictors of functional impairment. Methods: We examined data from participants diagnosed with bvFTD (n = 607), svPPA (n = 132), and nfvPPA (n = 155) who were included in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set (UDS) and assessed with the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ). Stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify associations between FAQ scores and cognitive/behavioral deficits using the NACC UDS neuropsychological testing battery and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire. Results: FAQ scores were higher in bvFTD than svPPA or nfvPPA. Functional deficits across FTD subtypes differed in severity, but not pattern, and were driven by executive dysfunction and behavioral symptoms. Conclusion: Executive dysfunction and behavioral symptoms underlie instrumental ADL deficits in FTD, which are most prominent in bvFTD.


2015 ◽  
Vol 115 (4) ◽  
pp. 763-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabricio Ferreira de Oliveira ◽  
Lucas Amorim Vieira de Barros ◽  
Paulo Henrique Ferreira Bertolucci

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (7S_Part_4) ◽  
pp. P198-P198
Author(s):  
Jolien Schaeverbeke ◽  
Patrick Dupont ◽  
Charlotte Evenepoel ◽  
Michel J. Grothe ◽  
Stefan J. Teipel ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Seripa ◽  
Alessandra Bizzarro ◽  
Francesco Panza ◽  
Adele Acciarri ◽  
Fabio Pellegrini ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document