scholarly journals Altered updating of bodily and spatial representations following tool-use in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel D. Vittersø ◽  
Gavin Buckingham ◽  
Monika Halicka ◽  
Michael J. Proulx ◽  
Janet H. Bultitude

AbstractDistorted representations of the body and peripersonal space are common in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), and might modulate its symptoms (e.g. asymmetric limb temperature). In pain-free people, such representations are malleable, and update when we interact with objects in our environment (e.g. during tool-use). Distortions are also common after immobilisation, but quickly normalise once movement is regained. We tested the hypothesis that people with CRPS have problems updating bodily and spatial representations, which contributes to the maintenance of their distorted representations by preventing normalization. We also explored spatially defined modulations of hand temperature asymmetries, and any influence of updating bodily and spatial representations on this effect. Thirty-six people with unilateral CRPS (18 upper limb, 18 lower limb) and 36 pain-free controls completed tool-use tasks considered to alter body and peripersonal space representations (measured using tactile distance judgements and a visuotactile crossmodal congruency task, respectively). We also tested how the arrangement (crossed, uncrossed) of the hands and tools affected hand temperature. In upper limb CRPS the non-affected arm representation updated normally, but the affected arm representation updated in the opposite to normal direction. A similar pattern was seen in lower limbs CRPS, although not significant. Furthermore, people with CRPS showed more pronounced updating of peripersonal space than the controls. We did not observe any modulation of hand temperature asymmetries by the arrangement of hands or tools. Our findings suggest enhanced malleability of bodily and spatial representations in CRPS, potentially implicating central mechanisms in the aetiology of this condition.

Cephalalgia ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 033310242110582
Author(s):  
Peter D Drummond ◽  
Philip M Finch

Background Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias and complex regional pain syndrome are rare conditions, and their co-occurrence has not been reported previously. Clinical findings: In two patients, ipsilateral trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias developed after the onset of upper limb complex regional pain syndrome. Hyperalgesia to thermal and mechanical stimuli extended beyond the affected limb to encompass the ipsilateral forehead, and was accompanied by ipsilateral hyperacusis and photophobia. In addition, examination of the painful limb and bright light appeared to aggravate symptoms of trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. Detailed examination of the association between facial and upper limb pain indicated that both sources of pain cycled together. Furthermore, in one case, stellate ganglion blockade inhibited pain for an extended period not only in the affected limb but also the face. Conclusions These findings suggest some overlap in the pathophysiology of complex regional pain syndrome and trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. Specifically, central sensitization and/or disruption of inhibitory pain modulation on the affected side of the body in complex regional pain syndrome might trigger ipsilateral cranial symptoms and increase vulnerability to trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias.


Pain ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 161 (7) ◽  
pp. 1609-1628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel D. Vittersø ◽  
Gavin Buckingham ◽  
Monika Halicka ◽  
Michael J. Proulx ◽  
Janet H. Bultitude

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel D. Vittersø ◽  
Gavin Buckingham ◽  
Antonia F. Ten Brink ◽  
Monika Halicka ◽  
Michael J. Proulx ◽  
...  

AbstractSensorimotor conflict is theorised to contribute to the maintenance of some pathological pain conditions, such as Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). We therefore tested whether sensorimotor adaptation is impaired in people with CRPS by characterising their adaption to lateral prismatic shifts in vision. People with unilateral upper limb CRPS Type I (n = 17), and pain-free individuals (n = 18; matched for age, sex, and handedness) completed prism adaptation with their affected/non-dominant and non-affected/dominant arm, in a counterbalanced order. We examined 1) the rate at which participants compensated for the optical shift during prism exposure (i.e. strategic recalibration), 2) endpoint errors made directly after prism adaptation (sensorimotor realignment) and their retention, and 3) kinematic markers associated with feedforward motor control and sensorimotor realignment. We found no evidence that strategic recalibration was different between people with CRPS and controls, including no evidence for differences in a kinematic marker associated with trial-by-trial changes in movement plans. Participants made significant endpoint errors in the prism adaptation after-effect phase, which are indicative of sensorimotor realignment. Overall, the magnitude of this realignment was not found to differ between people with CRPS and pain-free controls. However, people with CRPS made greater endpoint errors when using their affected hand than their non-affected hand, whereas no such difference was seen in controls. Taken together, these findings suggest that strategic control and sensorimotor realignment were not impaired for either arm in people with CRPS. In contrast, they provide some evidence that there is a greater propensity for sensorimotor realignment in CRPS, consistent with more flexible representations of the body and peripersonal space. Our study challenges the theory that sensorimotor conflict might underlie pathological pain that is maintained in the absence of tissue pathology.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Davies Vittersø ◽  
Monika Halicka ◽  
Gavin Buckingham ◽  
Michael J Proulx ◽  
Mark Wilson ◽  
...  

Representations of the body and peripersonal space can be distorted for people with some chronic pain conditions. Experimental pain induction can give rise to similar, but transient distortions in healthy individuals. However, spatial and bodily representations are dynamic, and constantly update as we interact with objects in our environment. It is unclear whether induced pain disrupts the mechanisms involved in updating these representations. In the present study, we sought to investigate the effect of induced pain on the updating of peripersonal space and body representations during and following tool-use. We compared performance under three conditions (pain, active placebo, neutral) on a visuotactile crossmodal congruency task and a tactile distance judgement task to measure updating of peripersonal space and body representations, respectively. We induced pain by applying 1% capsaicin cream to the arm, and for placebo we used a gel that induced non-painful warming. Consistent with previous findings, the difference in crossmodal interference from visual distractors in the same compared to opposite visual field to the tactile target was less when tools were crossed than uncrossed. This suggests an extension of peripersonal space to incorporate the tips of the tools. Also consistent with previous findings, estimates of the felt distance between two points (tactile distance judgements) decreased after active tool-use. In contrast to our predictions, however, we found no evidence that pain interfered with performance on either task when compared to the control conditions. This suggests that the updating of peripersonal space and body representations is not disrupted by induced pain. Therefore, acute pain does not account for the distorted representations of the body and peripersonal space that can endure in people with chronic pain conditions.


Author(s):  
Jeremy Simon ◽  
Michael Mehnert ◽  
Matthew McAuliffe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document