crossmodal congruency
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

39
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 103267
Author(s):  
Elena Gherri ◽  
Marios Theocharopoulos ◽  
Niall Browne ◽  
Nazire Duran ◽  
Elizabeth J. Austin

Author(s):  
Caterina Padulo ◽  
Michela Mangone ◽  
Alfredo Brancucci ◽  
Michela Balsamo ◽  
Beth Fairfield

2020 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. 102900
Author(s):  
Alan O' Dowd ◽  
Francesca Sorgini ◽  
Fiona N. Newell

Author(s):  
Focko L. Higgen ◽  
Charlotte Heine ◽  
Lutz Krawinkel ◽  
Florian Göschl ◽  
Andreas K. Engel ◽  
...  

PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e6976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Blustein ◽  
Satinder Gill ◽  
Adam Wilson ◽  
Jon Sensinger

The incorporation of feedback into a person’s body schema is well established. The crossmodal congruency task (CCT) is used to objectively quantify incorporation without being susceptible to experimenter biases. This visual-tactile interference task is used to calculate the crossmodal congruency effect (CCE) score as a difference in response time between incongruent and congruent trials. Here we show that this metric is susceptible to a learning effect that causes attenuation of the CCE score due to repeated task exposure sessions. We demonstrate that this learning effect is persistent, even after a 6 month hiatus in testing. Two mitigation strategies are proposed: 1. Only use CCE scores that are taken after learning has stabilized, or 2. Use a modified CCT protocol that decreases the task exposure time. We show that the modified and shortened CCT protocol, which may be required to meet time or logistical constraints in laboratory or clinical settings, reduced the impact of the learning effect on CCT results. Importantly, the CCE scores from the modified protocol were not significantly more variable than results obtained with the original protocol. This study highlights the importance of considering exposure time to the CCT when designing experiments and suggests two mitigation strategies to improve the utility of this psychophysical assessment.


Vision ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Johannes Lohmann ◽  
Anna Belardinelli ◽  
Martin V. Butz

According to theories of anticipatory behavior control, actions are initiated by predicting their sensory outcomes. From the perspective of event-predictive cognition and active inference, predictive processes activate currently desired events and event boundaries, as well as the expected sensorimotor mappings necessary to realize them, dependent on the involved predicted uncertainties before actual motor control unfolds. Accordingly, we asked whether peripersonal hand space is remapped in an uncertainty anticipating manner while grasping and placing bottles in a virtual reality (VR) setup. To investigate, we combined the crossmodal congruency paradigm with virtual object interactions in two experiments. As expected, an anticipatory crossmodal congruency effect (aCCE) at the future finger position on the bottle was detected. Moreover, a manipulation of the visuo-motor mapping of the participants’ virtual hand while approaching the bottle selectively reduced the aCCE at movement onset. Our results support theories of event-predictive, anticipatory behavior control and active inference, showing that expected uncertainties in movement control indeed influence anticipatory stimulus processing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document