Theory of Arachnid Prey Localization

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (24) ◽  
pp. 5668-5671 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Stürzl ◽  
R. Kempter ◽  
J. L. van Hemmen
Keyword(s):  
2003 ◽  
Vol 91 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Moritz P. Franosch ◽  
Marion C. Sobotka ◽  
Andreas Elepfandt ◽  
J. Leo van Hemmen

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 836-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josefin Starkhammar ◽  
Patrick W. Moore ◽  
Lois Talmadge ◽  
Dorian S. Houser

Recent recordings of dolphin echolocation using a dense array of hydrophones suggest that the echolocation beam is dynamic and can at times consist of a single dominant peak, while at other times it consists of forward projected primary and secondary peaks with similar energy, partially overlapping in space and frequency bandwidth. The spatial separation of the peaks provides an area in front of the dolphin, where the spectral magnitude slopes drop off quickly for certain frequency bands. This region is potentially used to optimize prey localization by directing the maximum pressure slope of the echolocation beam at the target, rather than the maximum pressure peak. The dolphin was able to steer the beam horizontally to a greater extent than previously described. The complex and dynamic sound field generated by the echolocating dolphin may be due to the use of two sets of phonic lips as sound sources, or an unknown complexity in the sound propagation paths or acoustic properties of the forehead tissues of the dolphin.


2015 ◽  
Vol 282 (1814) ◽  
pp. 20151403 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Rhebergen ◽  
R. C. Taylor ◽  
M. J. Ryan ◽  
R. A. Page ◽  
W. Halfwerk

Predators often eavesdrop on sexual displays of their prey. These displays can provide multimodal cues that aid predators, but the benefits in attending to them should depend on the environmental sensory conditions under which they forage. We assessed whether bats hunting for frogs use multimodal cues to locate their prey and whether their use varies with ambient conditions. We used a robotic set-up mimicking the sexual display of a male túngara frog ( Physalaemus pustulosus ) to test prey assessment by fringe-lipped bats ( Trachops cirrhosus ). These predatory bats primarily use sound of the frog's call to find their prey, but the bats also use echolocation cues returning from the frog's dynamically moving vocal sac. In the first experiment, we show that multimodal cues affect attack behaviour: bats made narrower flank attack angles on multimodal trials compared with unimodal trials during which they could only rely on the sound of the frog. In the second experiment, we explored the bat's use of prey cues in an acoustically more complex environment. Túngara frogs often form mixed-species choruses with other frogs, including the hourglass frog ( Dendropsophus ebraccatus ). Using a multi-speaker set-up, we tested bat approaches and attacks on the robofrog under three different levels of acoustic complexity: no calling D. ebraccatus males, two calling D. ebraccatus males and five D. ebraccatus males. We found that bats are more directional in their approach to the robofrog when more D. ebraccatus males were calling. Thus, bats seemed to benefit more from multimodal cues when confronted with increased levels of acoustic complexity in their foraging environments. Our data have important consequences for our understanding of the evolution of multimodal sexual displays as they reveal how environmental conditions can alter the natural selection pressures acting on them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document