The long‐term inflation hedging effectiveness of real estate and financial assets

2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 267-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abeyratna Gunasekarage ◽  
David M. Power ◽  
Ting Ting Zhou
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tinufa Anthony ◽  
Daniel Dabara ◽  
Ikempe Ankeli ◽  
Oladejo Agidi

1989 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Rubens ◽  
Michael Bond ◽  
James Webb

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Wurstbauer ◽  
Wolfgang Schäfers

Purpose – Similar to real estate, infrastructure investments are regarded as providing a good inflation hedge and inflation protection. However, the empirical literature on infrastructure and inflation is scarce. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the short- and long-term inflation-hedging characteristics, as well as the inflation protection associated with infrastructure and real estate assets. Design/methodology/approach – Based on a unique data set for direct infrastructure performance, a listed infrastructure index, common direct and listed real estate indices, the authors test for short- and long-term inflation-hedging characteristics of these assets in the USA from 1991-2013. The authors employ the traditional Fama and Schwert (1977) framework, as well as Engle and Granger (1987) co-integration tests. Granger causality tests are further conducted, so as to gain insight into the short-run dynamics. Finally, shortfall risk measures are applied to investigate the inflation protection characteristics of the different assets over increasingly long investment horizons. Findings – The empirical results indicate that in the short run, only direct infrastructure provides a partial hedge against inflation. However, co-integration tests suggest that all series have a long-run co-movement with inflation, implying a long-term hedge. The causality tests reveal reverse unidirectional causality – while real estate asset returns are Granger-caused by inflation, infrastructure asset returns seem to cause inflation. These findings further confirm that both assets represent a distinct asset class. Ultimately, direct infrastructure investments exhibit the most desirable inflation protection characteristics among the set of assets. Research limitations/implications – This study only presents results based on a composite direct infrastructure index, as no sub-indices for sub-sectors are available yet. Practical implications – Investors seeking assets that are sensitive to inflation and mitigate inflation risk should consider direct infrastructure investments in their asset allocation strategy. Originality/value – This is the first study to examine the ability of direct infrastructure to assess inflation risk.


1986 ◽  
Vol 1986 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-72
Author(s):  
David P. Feldman
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 45 (03) ◽  
pp. 240-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Shabo

Summary Objectives: This paper pursues the challenge of sustaining lifetime electronic health records (EHRs) based on a comprehensive socio-economic-medico-legal model. The notion of a lifetime EHR extends the emerging concept of a longitudinal and cross-institutional EHR and is invaluable information for increasing patient safety and quality of care. Methods: The challenge is how to compile and sustain a coherent EHR across the lifetime of an individual. Several existing and hypothetical models are described, analyzed and compared in an attempt to suggest a preferred approach. Results: The vision is that lifetime EHRs should be sustained by new players in the healthcare arena, who will function as independent health record banks (IHRBs). Multiple competing IHRBs would be established and regulated following preemptive legislation. They should be neither owned by healthcare providers nor by health insurer/payers or government agencies. The new legislation should also stipulate that the records located in these banks be considered the medico-legal copies of an individual’s records, and that healthcare providers no longer serve as the legal record keepers. Conclusions: The proposed model is not centered on any of the current players in the field; instead, it is focussed on the objective service of sustaining individual EHRs, much like financial banks maintain and manage financial assets. This revolutionary structure provides two main benefits: 1) Healthcare organizations will be able to cut the costs of long-term record keeping, and 2) healthcare providers will be able to provide better care based on the availability of a lifelong EHR of their new patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document