The Double Disadvantage: Using Status and Stigma Processes to Understand Race, Criminal Record, and Moral Expectations in Employment

2021 ◽  
pp. 119-142
Author(s):  
Jessica Pfaffendorf
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 777-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Xavier Roux-Demare
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-31
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Lageson ◽  
Elizabeth Webster ◽  
Juan R. Sandoval

Digitization and the release of public records on the Internet have expanded the reach and uses of criminal record data in the United States. This study analyzes the types and volume of personally identifiable data released on the Internet via two hundred public governmental websites for law enforcement, criminal courts, corrections, and criminal record repositories in each state. We find that public disclosures often include information valuable to the personal data economy, including the full name, birthdate, home address, and physical characteristics of arrestees, detainees, and defendants. Using administrative data, we also estimate the volume of data disclosed online. Our findings highlight the mass dissemination of pre-conviction data: every year, over ten million arrests, 4.5 million mug shots, and 14.7 million criminal court proceedings are digitally released at no cost. Post-conviction, approximately 6.5 million current and former prisoners and 12.5 million people with a felony conviction have a record on the Internet. While justified through public records laws, such broad disclosures reveal an imbalance between the “transparency” of data releases that facilitate monitoring of state action and those that facilitate monitoring individual people. The results show how the criminal legal system increasingly distributes Internet privacy violations and community surveillance as part of contemporary punishment.


1982 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisli H. Gudjonsson ◽  
Hannes Petursson

This paper investigates the relationship between some criminological and psychiatric aspects of homicide in Iceland for the period 1900–1979. During this period there were 45 homicide incidents, involving 52 victims and 47 offenders. 16 (34·0 per cent) of the offenders were considered to be psychiatrically ill or subnormal at the time of their offence and a further 17 (36·2 per cent) suffered from personality disorder, alcoholism or drug dependency. A relationship was found between psychiatric abnormality and such variables as day and time of offence, previous criminal record, method of killing, relationship between victim and offender, motive, and action after offence. These findings are generally consistent with previous homicide research.


BMJ ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 350 (apr14 16) ◽  
pp. h2001-h2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Dyer
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Nora V. Demleitner

Prosecutorial decisions play an important, and sometimes a decisive, role in a defendant’s ultimate sentence. They begin with the selection of charges and may end with a recommendation on clemency or expungement of a criminal conviction. The influence of prosecutors over the sentence, therefore, is far more extensive than that of any other official. The charging decision sets the starting point for the sentence range. The prosecution tends to control entry into diversion programs that may spare an offender a criminal record after complying with a set of requirements. Plea bargains, which have become more frequent even in Europe’s civil law countries, usually focus on the type and scope of the criminal justice sentence. Mandatory minimum sentences, mandatory aggravators, and stacked charges provide prosecutors with overwhelming bargaining power, causing many defendants to waive their right to a trial. Judges tend to follow the parties’ agreements and impose the recommended sentence. In many states prosecutors routinely weigh in on parole decisions and determine whether to proceed against defendants for supervision violations. Even in clemency decisions, they frequently submit a recommendation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document