scholarly journals An Evaluation of Different Features and Learning Models for Anomalous Event Detection

Author(s):  
Hajananth Nallaivarothayan ◽  
David Ryan ◽  
Simon Denman ◽  
Sridha Sridharan ◽  
Clinton Fookes
Author(s):  
Masoomeh Zameni ◽  
Mengyi He ◽  
Masud Moshtaghi ◽  
Zahra Ghafoori ◽  
Christopher Leckie ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sungbok Shin ◽  
Minsuk Choi ◽  
Jinho Choi ◽  
Scott Langevin ◽  
Christopher Bethune ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose N. Hernandez ◽  
Kurt R. Moore ◽  
Richard C. Elphic

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dália Loureiro ◽  
Conceição Amado ◽  
André Martins ◽  
Diogo Vitorino ◽  
Aisha Mamade ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (03) ◽  
pp. 2451-2458
Author(s):  
Akansha Bhardwaj ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Philippe Cudré-Mauroux

Microblogging platforms such as Twitter are increasingly being used in event detection. Existing approaches mainly use machine learning models and rely on event-related keywords to collect the data for model training. These approaches make strong assumptions on the distribution of the relevant microposts containing the keyword – referred to as the expectation of the distribution – and use it as a posterior regularization parameter during model training. Such approaches are, however, limited as they fail to reliably estimate the informativeness of a keyword and its expectation for model training. This paper introduces a Human-AI loop approach to jointly discover informative keywords for model training while estimating their expectation. Our approach iteratively leverages the crowd to estimate both keyword-specific expectation and the disagreement between the crowd and the model in order to discover new keywords that are most beneficial for model training. These keywords and their expectation not only improve the resulting performance but also make the model training process more transparent. We empirically demonstrate the merits of our approach, both in terms of accuracy and interpretability, on multiple real-world datasets and show that our approach improves the state of the art by 24.3%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document