Glacial avalanche hazard's comparative geospatial analysis in Shigar and Shyok basins

Author(s):  
Syed Naseem Abbas Gilany ◽  
Javed Iqbal
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
pp. 136-144
Author(s):  
G. N. Ogureeva ◽  
T. V. Kotova

The concept of ecological potential is realized by development of biogeographical and bioecological maps. Experience of preparation of a set of integrated bioecological maps of Russia of scale 1 : 8 000 000, displaying biot as a whole is presented. It includes maps – Zones and altitudinal zonality types of vegetation of Russia and adjacent territories, Ecoregions of Russia, Bioms of Russia. Maps are developed on the basis of allocation regional (ecological division) and typological (bioms diversity) divisions biote a cover. These divisions can serve basic units at geoinformation researches of modern ecological potential, a binding of the information according to a biodiversity and to a condition biote at national and regional levels. On them it is possible to make inventory of a biodiversity, the major parameter of ecological potential of landscapes, to choose characteristic and unique objects for monitoring and conservations, to planning the actions connected with sustainability progress lands and conservations ecosystems and other.They are directed on revealing of ecological potential of territorial units (zones ecoregions bioregions) through the ecological characteristic biote or on revealing of differentiation biote (zonobioms group of regional bioms regional bioms) through the characteristic of its ecology-typological variety.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trista M. Brophy ◽  
◽  
Steven P. Hohman ◽  
A.J. Reisinger ◽  
Eban Z. Bean ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Munazza Fatima ◽  
Kara J. O’Keefe ◽  
Wenjia Wei ◽  
Sana Arshad ◽  
Oliver Gruebner

The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China in late December 2019 became the harbinger of the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, geospatial techniques, such as modeling and mapping, have helped in disease pattern detection. Here we provide a synthesis of the techniques and associated findings in relation to COVID-19 and its geographic, environmental, and socio-demographic characteristics, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) methodology for scoping reviews. We searched PubMed for relevant articles and discussed the results separately for three categories: disease mapping, exposure mapping, and spatial epidemiological modeling. The majority of studies were ecological in nature and primarily carried out in China, Brazil, and the USA. The most common spatial methods used were clustering, hotspot analysis, space-time scan statistic, and regression modeling. Researchers used a wide range of spatial and statistical software to apply spatial analysis for the purpose of disease mapping, exposure mapping, and epidemiological modeling. Factors limiting the use of these spatial techniques were the unavailability and bias of COVID-19 data—along with scarcity of fine-scaled demographic, environmental, and socio-economic data—which restrained most of the researchers from exploring causal relationships of potential influencing factors of COVID-19. Our review identified geospatial analysis in COVID-19 research and highlighted current trends and research gaps. Since most of the studies found centered on Asia and the Americas, there is a need for more comparable spatial studies using geographically fine-scaled data in other areas of the world.


2021 ◽  
pp. 100043
Author(s):  
Panos Vostanis ◽  
Joshua Vande Hey ◽  
Mamun Ur-Rashid ◽  
Cristina Ruiz Villena ◽  
Marios Panagi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Tristan Hurzeler ◽  
Nicholas A. Buckley ◽  
Firouzeh Noghrehchi ◽  
Peter Malouf ◽  
Andrew Page ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document