scholarly journals Focused Software Quality Assurance in Mobile Applications

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehreen Sirshar ◽  
Sania Imran ◽  
Faiqa Mehboob
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Software Quality ◽  
Mobile Applications ◽  
Mobile Application ◽  
Object Oriented ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Software Quality Assurance ◽  
User Requirements ◽  
Continuous Evaluation ◽  
Mobile Industry

As the time passes the modification in technology world lead to the evaluation in mobile application as well. With evaluation in mobile industry it is an open challenge for software quality researcher that how to enhance software quality to meet the needs of changes? Quality assurance play a key role in differentiating good application from bed application. With the continuous evaluation of mobile application developing process should be quick and efficient to comply with user requirements and satisfaction. While the listed requirement leads to bad design choices known as antipatterns, which in turn affect the reliability of the code. A tool based method PAPRIKA is used in the proposed re-search to identify and monitor these antipatterns together with a two-step assessment model for software quality assurance and object oriented software quality matrix.

Matrix-based component dependence representation and its applications in software quality assurance

2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 29-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bixin Li ◽  
Ying Zhou ◽  
Yancheng Wang ◽  
Junhui Mo
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Software Quality ◽  
Software Quality Assurance

Benchmarking PRAISE-CANDU 1.0 With xLPR 1.0

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Wang ◽  
Xinjian Duan ◽  
Michael J. Kozluk
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Software Quality ◽  
Verification And Validation ◽  
Quality Assurance Program ◽  
Software Quality Assurance ◽  
Full Compliance ◽  
Low Probability ◽  
State Of Art

A probabilistic fracture mechanics code, PRAISE-CANDU 1.0, has been developed under a software quality assurance program in full compliance with CSA N286.7-99, and was initially released in 2012 June. Extensive verification and validation has been performed on PRAISE-CANDU 1.0 for the purpose of software quality assurance. This paper presents the benchmarking performed between PRAISE-CANDU 1.0 and xLPR (eXtremely Low Probability of Rupture) version 1.0 using the cases from the xLPR pilot study. The xLPR code was developed in a configuration management and quality assured manner. Both codes adopted a state-of-art code architecture for the treatment of the uncertainties. Inputs to the PRAISE-CANDU were established as close as possible to those used in corresponding xLPR cases. Excellent agreement has been observed among the results obtained from the two PFM codes in spite of some differences between the codes. This benchmarking is considered to be an important element of the validation of PRAISE-CANDU.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document