Hybrid Control for Semi-Active Suspension Design of a Railway Vehicle

Author(s):  
Asli Soyic Leblebici ◽  
Semiha Turkay
2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yechen Qin ◽  
Feng Zhao ◽  
Zhenfeng Wang ◽  
Liang Gu ◽  
Mingming Dong

This paper presents a comprehensive comparison and analysis for the effect of time delay on the five most representative semi-active suspension control strategies, and refers to four unsolved problems related to semi-active suspension performance and delay mechanism that existed. Dynamic characteristics of a commercially available continuous damping control (CDC) damper were first studied, and a material test system (MTS) load frame was used to depict the velocity-force map for a CDC damper. Both inverse and boundary models were developed to determine dynamic characteristics of the damper. In addition, in order for an improper damper delay of the form t+τ to be corrected, a delay mechanism of controllable damper was discussed in detail. Numerical simulation for five control strategies, i.e., modified skyhook control SC, hybrid control (HC), COC, model reference sliding mode control (MRSMC), and integrated error neuro control (IENC), with three different time delays: 5 ms, 10 ms, and 15 ms was performed. Simulation results displayed that by changing control weights/variables, performance of all five control strategies varied from being ride comfort oriented to being road handling oriented. Furthermore, increase in delay time resulted in deterioration of both ride comfort and road handling. Specifically, ride comfort was affected more than road handling. The answers to all four questions were finally provided according to simulation results.


2003 ◽  
Vol 2003 (0) ◽  
pp. _141-1_-_141-6_
Author(s):  
Yoshiki SUGAHARA ◽  
Tadao TAKIGAMI ◽  
Daisuke YAMAMOTO

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cédric Nouillant ◽  
Xavier Moreau ◽  
Alain Oustaloup

2014 ◽  
Vol 699 ◽  
pp. 283-288
Author(s):  
Mohamad Hafiz Harun ◽  
Fauzi Ahmad ◽  
Mohd Razali Md Yunos ◽  
Ahmad Kamal Mat Yamin

Passenger ride comfort is an important factor in railway vehicle services. However, passenger ride comfort is sometimes affected by the vibrations resulting from the track irregularities. It will be critical when the track is exposed to prolonged sun’s heat and lack of track maintenance. This means that the optimization of passive suspension parameters alone could not cope with these cases. Semi-active suspension system for railway vehicles has been developed as a way to solve these problems. The technology of semi-active suspension is widely used especially in the railway vehicle application. Magnetorheological (MR) damper is one of the applications of the concept of semi-active suspension. However, there are a variety of criteria for MR dampers based on usage. To meet the requirements of railway vehicle suspension system, a MR damper have been developed. The criteria for the MR damper are obtained experimentally. Then, the model for the MR damper is developed using Interpolated Sixth Order Polynomial and validated by experimental. The MR damper model has shown improvement, especially in the railway vehicle dynamics performance.


2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin-Jie Zhang ◽  
Mehdi Ahmadian ◽  
Kong-Hui Guo

Inerters have become a hot topic in recent years especially in vehicle, train, building suspension systems, etc. Eight different layouts of suspensions were analyzed with a quarter-car model in this paper. Dimensionless root mean square (RMS) responses of the sprung mass vertical acceleration, the suspension travel, and the tire deflection are derived which were used to evaluate the performance of the quarter-car model. The behaviour of semi-active suspensions with inerters using Groundhook, Skyhook, and Hybrid control has been evaluated and compared to the performance of passive suspensions with inerters. Sensitivity analysis was applied to the development of a high performance semi-active suspension with an inerter. Numerical simulations indicate that a semi-active suspension with an inerter has much better performance than the passive suspension with an inerter, especially with the Hybrid control method, which has the best compromise between comfort and road holding quality.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013.88 (0) ◽  
pp. _8-12_
Author(s):  
Koichiro ISHIHARA ◽  
Satoshi KOIZUMI ◽  
Osamu GOTOU ◽  
Masatomo KISHI

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document