Inverse rendering in SUV space with a linear texture model

Author(s):  
Oswald Aldrian ◽  
William A. P. Smith
Geophysics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. W1-W13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dengliang Gao

In exploration geology and geophysics, seismic texture is still a developing concept that has not been sufficiently known, although quite a number of different algorithms have been published in the literature. This paper provides a review of the seismic texture concepts and methodologies, focusing on latest developments in seismic amplitude texture analysis, with particular reference to the gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and the texture model regression (TMR) methods. The GLCM method evaluates spatial arrangements of amplitude samples within an analysis window using a matrix (a two-dimensional histogram) of amplitude co-occurrence. The matrix is then transformed into a suite of texture attributes, such as homogeneity, contrast, and randomness, which provide the basis for seismic facies classification. The TMR method uses a texture model as reference to discriminate among seismic features based on a linear, least-squares regression analysis between the model and the data within an analysis window. By implementing customized texture model schemes, the TMR algorithm has the flexibility to characterize subsurface geology for different purposes. A texture model with a constant phase is effective at enhancing the visibility of seismic structural fabrics, a texture model with a variable phase is helpful for visualizing seismic facies, and a texture model with variable amplitude, frequency, and size is instrumental in calibrating seismic to reservoir properties. Preliminary test case studies in the very recent past have indicated that the latest developments in seismic texture analysis have added to the existing amplitude interpretation theories and methodologies. These and future developments in seismic texture theory and methodologies will hopefully lead to a better understanding of the geologic implications of the seismic texture concept and to an improved geologic interpretation of reflection seismic amplitude.


2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Baptiste Nicolet ◽  
Alec Jacobson ◽  
Wenzel Jakob
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (12) ◽  
pp. 5509-5514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Po‐Hao Feng ◽  
Yin‐Tzu Lin ◽  
Chung‐Ming Lo

1996 ◽  
Vol 7 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 336
Author(s):  
Janelle R. Howe ◽  
Hildegarde Heymann

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Voronin ◽  
V. I. Marchuk ◽  
S. P. Petrosov ◽  
I. Svirin ◽  
S. Agaian ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
pp. 51-64
Author(s):  
Hitoshi GOTOH ◽  
Mami HASHIMOTO ◽  
Tetsuo SAKAI
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Jenicka S

Accuracy of land cover classification in remotely sensed images relies on the features extracted and the classifier used. Texture features are significant in land cover classification. Traditional texture models capture only patterns with discrete boundaries whereas fuzzy patterns need to be classified by assigning due weightage to uncertainty. When remotely sensed image contains noise, the image may have fuzzy patterns characterizing land covers and fuzzy boundaries separating land covers. So a fuzzy texture model is proposed for effective classification of land covers in remotely sensed images and the model uses Sugeno Fuzzy Inference System (FIS). Support Vector Machine (SVM) is used for precise and fast classification of image pixels. Hence it is proposed to use a hybrid of fuzzy texture model and SVM for land cover classification of remotely sensed images. In this chapter, land cover classification of IRS-P6, LISS-IV remotely sensed image is performed using multivariate version of the proposed texture model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document