2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Xuanli Han ◽  
Jigen Peng ◽  
Angang Cui ◽  
Fujun Zhao

In this paper, we describe a novel approach to sparse principal component analysis (SPCA) via a nonconvex sparsity-inducing fraction penalty function SPCA (FP-SPCA). Firstly, SPCA is reformulated as a fraction penalty regression problem model. Secondly, an algorithm corresponding to the model is proposed and the convergence of the algorithm is guaranteed. Finally, numerical experiments were carried out on a synthetic data set, and the experimental results show that the FP-SPCA method is more adaptable and has a better performance in the tradeoff between sparsity and explainable variance than SPCA.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aida Calviño

Abstract In this article we propose a simple and versatile method for limiting disclosure in continuous microdata based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Instead of perturbing the original variables, we propose to alter the principal components, as they contain the same information but are uncorrelated, which permits working on each component separately, reducing processing times. The number and weight of the perturbed components determine the level of protection and distortion of the masked data. The method provides preservation of the mean vector and the variance-covariance matrix. Furthermore, depending on the technique chosen to perturb the principal components, the proposed method can provide masked, hybrid or fully synthetic data sets. Some examples of application and comparison with other methods previously proposed in the literature (in terms of disclosure risk and data utility) are also included.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Sperber

For years, dissociation studies on neurological single cases were the dominant method to infer fundamental cognitive functions in neuropsychology. In contrast, the association between deficits was considered to be of less epistemological value and even misleading. Still, principal component analysis (PCA), an associational method for dimensionality reduction, recently became popular for the identification of fundamental functions. The current study evaluated the ability of PCA to identify the fundamental variables underlying a battery of measures. Synthetic data were simulated to resemble typical neuropsychological data, including varying dissociation patterns. In most experiments, PCA succeeded to measure the underlying target variables with high up to almost perfect precision. However, this success relied on additional factor rotation. Unroated PCA struggled with the dependence of data and often failed. On the other hand, the performance of rotated factor solutions required single measures that anchored the rotation. When no test scores existed that primarily and precisely measured each underlying target variable, rotated solutions also failed their intended purpose. Further, the dimensionality of the simulated data was consistently underestimated. Commonly used strategies to estimate the number of meaningful factors appear to be inappropriate for neuropsychological data. Finally, simulations suggested a high potential of PCA to denoise data, with factor rotation providing an additional filter function. This can be invaluable in neuropsychology, where measures are often inherently noisy, and PCA can be superior to common compound measures - such as the arithmetic mean - in the measurement of variables with high reliability. In summary, PCA appears to be a powerful tool in neuropsychology that is well capable to infer fundamental cognitive functions with high precision, but the typical structure of neuropsychological data places clear limitations and a risk of a complete methodological failure on the method.


VASA ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 333-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirchberger ◽  
Finger ◽  
Müller-Bühl

Background: The Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ) is a short questionnaire for the assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with intermittent claudication (IC). The objective of this study was to translate the ICQ into German and to investigate the psychometric properties of the German ICQ version in patients with IC. Patients and methods: The original English version was translated using a forward-backward method. The resulting German version was reviewed by the author of the original version and an experienced clinician. Finally, it was tested for clarity with 5 German patients with IC. A sample of 81 patients were administered the German ICQ. The sample consisted of 58.0 % male patients with a median age of 71 years and a median IC duration of 36 months. Test of feasibility included completeness of questionnaires, completion time, and ratings of clarity, length and relevance. Reliability was assessed through a retest in 13 patients at 14 days, and analysis of Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency. Construct validity was investigated using principal component analysis. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating the ICQ scores with the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) as well as clinical measures. Results: The ICQ was completely filled in by 73 subjects (90.1 %) with an average completion time of 6.3 minutes. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient reached 0.75. Intra-class correlation for test-retest reliability was r = 0.88. Principal component analysis resulted in a 3 factor solution. The first factor explained 51.5 of the total variation and all items had loadings of at least 0.65 on it. The ICQ was significantly associated with the SF-36 and treadmill-walking distances whereas no association was found for resting ABPI. Conclusions: The German version of the ICQ demonstrated good feasibility, satisfactory reliability and good validity. Responsiveness should be investigated in further validation studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document