Face Recognition Challenge: Object Recognition Approaches for Human/Avatar Classification

Author(s):  
Toshihiko Yamasaki ◽  
Tsuhan Chen
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (05) ◽  
pp. 525-533
Author(s):  
Evrim Gülbetekin ◽  
Seda Bayraktar ◽  
Özlenen Özkan ◽  
Hilmi Uysal ◽  
Ömer Özkan

AbstractThe authors tested face discrimination, face recognition, object discrimination, and object recognition in two face transplantation patients (FTPs) who had facial injury since infancy, a patient who had a facial surgery due to a recent wound, and two control subjects. In Experiment 1, the authors showed them original faces and morphed forms of those faces and asked them to rate the similarity between the two. In Experiment 2, they showed old, new, and implicit faces and asked whether they recognized them or not. In Experiment 3, they showed them original objects and morphed forms of those objects and asked them to rate the similarity between the two. In Experiment 4, they showed old, new, and implicit objects and asked whether they recognized them or not. Object discrimination and object recognition performance did not differ between the FTPs and the controls. However, the face discrimination performance of FTP2 and face recognition performance of the FTP1 were poorer than that of the controls were. Therefore, the authors concluded that the structure of the face might affect face processing.


Author(s):  
Charles A. Collin ◽  
Chang Hong Liu ◽  
Nikolaus F. Troje ◽  
Patricia A. McMullen ◽  
Avi Chaudhuri

1997 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 555-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morris Moscovitch ◽  
Gordon Winocur ◽  
Marlene Behrmann

In order to study face recognition in relative isolation from visual processes that may also contribute to object recognition and reading, we investigated CK, a man with normal face recognition but with object agnosia and dyslexia caused by a closed-head injury. We administered recognition tests of up right faces, of family resemblance, of age-transformed faces, of caricatures, of cartoons, of inverted faces, and of face features, of disguised faces, of perceptually degraded faces, of fractured faces, of faces parts, and of faces whose parts were made of objects. We compared CK's performance with that of at least 12 control participants. We found that CK performed as well as controls as long as the face was upright and retained the configurational integrity among the internal facial features, the eyes, nose, and mouth. This held regardless of whether the face was disguised or degraded and whether the face was represented as a photo, a caricature, a cartoon, or a face composed of objects. In the last case, CK perceived the face but, unlike controls, was rarely aware that it was composed of objects. When the face, or just the internal features, were inverted or when the configurational gestalt was broken by fracturing the face or misaligning the top and bottom halves, CK's performance suffered far more than that of controls. We conclude that face recognition normally depends on two systems: (1) a holistic, face-specific system that is dependent on orientationspecific coding of second-order relational features (internal), which is intact in CK and (2) a part-based object-recognition system, which is damaged in CK and which contributes to face recognition when the face stimulus does not satisfy the domain-specific conditions needed to activate the face system.


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 810-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. McGugin ◽  
J. Richler ◽  
G. Herzmann ◽  
M. Speegle ◽  
I. Gauthier

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xian Li ◽  
Maruti Mishra ◽  
Bar Yosef ◽  
Joseph DeGutis

Response times (RT) are commonly used to assess cognitive abilities and have recently been employed to assess face and object recognition abilities, such as quantifying the prevalence of object recognition deficits in developmental prosopagnosia (DP). However, it is unclear whether RTs from face and object processing tasks predict recognition ability beyond accuracy. To test the validity of RTs, we examined accuracy and RT on a widely-used face matching assessment modified to collect meaningful RT data, the computerized Benton Face Recognition Test (BFRT-c), and measured whether accuracy and RT predicted face recognition ability and DP/control group membership. 62 controls and 36 developmental prosopagnosics (DPs) performed the BFRT-c as well as validated measures of face recognition ability, the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT) and Famous Faces Test (FFT). In both controls and DPs, there was little-to-no association between BFRT-c accuracy and RT (controls: r=.07, DPs: r=.03). In controls, BFRT-c accuracy robustly predicted CFMT (r=.49), FFMT (r=.43), and a composite of these measures (r=.54), whereas BFRT-c RT was not significantly associated with these measures (all r's < .16). We also found that BFRT-c accuracy significantly differed between DPs and controls, but RT failed to differentiate the groups. These results were replicated when performing outlier removal and we also found that combined scores of accuracy and RT (inverse efficiency score and balanced integration score) did not predict face recognition ability or group membership as well as accuracy alone. Together, these results suggest that researchers should use caution when using RTs to characterize individual differences in face processing or diagnose deficits in prosopagnosia.


2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (41) ◽  
pp. 12887-12892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas G. Shakeshaft ◽  
Robert Plomin

Specific cognitive abilities in diverse domains are typically found to be highly heritable and substantially correlated with general cognitive ability (g), both phenotypically and genetically. Recent twin studies have found the ability to memorize and recognize faces to be an exception, being similarly heritable but phenotypically substantially uncorrelated both with g and with general object recognition. However, the genetic relationships between face recognition and other abilities (the extent to which they share a common genetic etiology) cannot be determined from phenotypic associations. In this, to our knowledge, first study of the genetic associations between face recognition and other domains, 2,000 18- and 19-year-old United Kingdom twins completed tests assessing their face recognition, object recognition, and general cognitive abilities. Results confirmed the substantial heritability of face recognition (61%), and multivariate genetic analyses found that most of this genetic influence is unique and not shared with other cognitive abilities.


1998 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 362-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike J. Dixon ◽  
Daniel N. Bub ◽  
Martin Arguin

Prosopagnosia is the neuropathological inability to recognize familiar people by their faces. It can occur in isolation or can coincide with recognition deficits for other nonface objects. Often, patients whose prosopagnosia is accompanied by object recognition difficulties have more trouble identifying certain categories of objects relative to others. In previous research, we demonstrated that objects that shared multiple visual features and were semantically close posed severe recognition difficulties for a patient with temporal lobe damage. We now demonstrate that this patient's face recognition is constrained by these same parameters. The prosopagnosic patient ELM had difficulties pairing faces to names when the faces shared visual features and the names were semantically related (e.g., Tonya Harding, Nancy Kerrigan, and Josée Chouinard— three ice skaters). He made tenfold fewer errors when the exact same faces were associated with semantically unrelated people (e.g., singer Celine Dion, actress Betty Grable, and First Lady Hillary Clinton). We conclude that prosopagnosia and co-occurring category-specific recognition problems both stem from difficulties disambiguating the stored representations of objects that share multiple visual features and refer to semantically close identities or concepts.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Xiang Wu ◽  
Ning Wu

The two-phase test sample representation (TPTSR) was proposed as a useful classifier for face recognition. However, the TPTSR method is not able to reject the impostor, so it should be modified for real-world applications. This paper introduces a thresholded TPTSR (T-TPTSR) method for complex object recognition with outliers, and two criteria for assessing the performance of outlier rejection and member classification are defined. The performance of the T-TPTSR method is compared with the modified global representation, PCA and LDA methods, respectively. The results show that the T-TPTSR method achieves the best performance among them according to the two criteria.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Gerlach ◽  
Solja K. Klargaard ◽  
Randi Starrfelt

There is an ongoing debate about whether face recognition and object recognition constitute separate domains. Clarification of this issue can have important theoretical implications as face recognition is often used as a prime example of domain-specificity in mind and brain. An important source of input to this debate comes from studies of individuals with developmental prosopagnosia, suggesting that face recognition can be selectively impaired. We put the selectivity-hypothesis to test by assessing the performance of 10 subjects with developmental prosopagnosia on demanding tests of visual object processing involving both regular and degraded drawings. None of the individuals exhibited a dissociation between face and object recognition, and as a group they were significantly more affected by degradation of objects than control participants. Importantly, we also find positive correlations between the severity of the face recognition impairment and the degree of impaired performance with degraded objects. This suggests that the face and object deficits are systematically related rather than coincidental. We conclude that at present, there is no strong evidence in the literature on developmental prosopagnosia supporting domain-specific accounts of face recognition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document