A Situated Cognition Model for CPPS Testing

Author(s):  
Udo Kannengiesser ◽  
Florian Krenn ◽  
Christian Stary
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 548-555
Author(s):  
Fang Chunying ◽  
Li Haifeng ◽  
Ma Lin

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 721-722
Author(s):  
Jean M. Mandler

AbstractRogers & McClelland (R&M) present a powerful account of semantic (conceptual) learning. Their model admirably handles many characteristics of early concept formation, but it also needs to address attentional biases, and distinguish direct input from error-driven learning, and fast versus slow learning. Not distinguishing implicit and explicit knowledge means that the authors also cannot explain why some coherently varying information becomes accessible and other information does not.


SAGE Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 215824401770046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Giamellaro

Although experience and context are omnibus terms, the relationship between them provides some guidance on how each can be used to inform an understanding of the other. This article presents contextualization, or the degree to which content and context are connected through experience, as a measurable outcome of learning, education, or situated cognition. Contextualization is proposed here as a construct that (a) indicates curricular intention, cognitive process, and learning outcomes; (b) is a measurable variable that can be correlated to measures of learning; (c) is broadly applicable and thus represents a comparison variable across diverse scenarios; and (d) represents an important link between existing theory and practice. A contextualization spectrum framework is proposed to align curricular intentions for student experience to the resulting disposition of knowledge, as connected through contextualization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document