An experimental study on flow resistance of regenerator wire meshes in oscillatory flow [in Stirling engines]

Author(s):  
S. Isshiki ◽  
Y. Takasaki ◽  
I. Ushiyama ◽  
N. Isshiki
1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seita ISSHIKI ◽  
Akira SAKANO ◽  
Izumi USHIYAMA ◽  
Naotsugu ISSHIKI

1999 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 505-510
Author(s):  
Toshihiko YAMASHITA ◽  
Hirotugu KANEKO ◽  
Masaki NIIYAMA ◽  
Shinichiro NAGATA

1994 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 627-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Kamotani ◽  
F.-B. Weng ◽  
S. Ostrach ◽  
J. Platt

An experimental study is made of natural convection oscillations in gallium melts enclosed by right circular cylinders with differentially heated end walls. Cases heated from below are examined for angles of inclination (φ) ranging from 0 deg (vertical) to 75 deg with aspect ratios Ar (height/diameter) of 2, 3, and 4. Temperature measurements are made along the circumference of the cylinder to detect the oscillations, from which the oscillatory flow structures are inferred. The critical Rayleigh numbers and oscillation frequencies are determined. For Ar=3 and φ = 0 deg, 30 deg the supercritical flow structures are discussed in detail.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1;15 (1;1) ◽  
pp. E89-E97
Author(s):  
Christof Birkenmaier

Background: The epidural lysis of adhesions (ELOA) procedure supposedly has a biomechanical component in addition to the targeted injection of medications into the epidural space. It is assumed that the catheters used for the ELOA procedure can release epidural scars and adhesions. Objectives: To evaluate the possible biomechanical effects of the typically used catheters and to put these effects into clinical perspective. Study Design: Experimental study. Setting: The biomechanical laboratory of an academic orthopedic surgery department. Methods: Experimental setups were devised that allow for the measurement of the 3 main forces that can be exerted by manipulating a catheter in the epidural space or by injecting fluids through such a catheter: axial forces, torsional forces, and hydraulic effects. Results: The maximum axial forces measured under extremely tight catheter guidance were 7 newton (N), whereas the maximum forces under conditions that more likely reflect a real treatment situation were between 1 and 2 N. The maximum torsional forces measured were 0.3 N under extremely tight catheter guidance and 0.01 N under more realistic conditions. The maximum flow that could be achieved through the typical catheter using normal saline and the maximum possible thumb pressure onto a 5 mL or a 10 mL Luer-Lock syringe was 0.48 mL/ s. Given these results and other data available to us, it appears impossible that the ELOA procedure with typically used catheters has any relevant mechanical effect. Limitations: Like with any experimental study, the realities of an in vivo situation can only be modeled to a limited degree. The main limitation of our study is that we cannot calculate, measure, or simulate neither the flow resistance between an epidural adhesion pocket and the open, local epidural space nor the flow resistance between the open, local epidural space and the larger epidural space as well as the retroperitoneal space. Conclusions: According to our findings and arguments, the ELOA procedure is predominantly a method for the highly targeted application of epidural medications and possibly also has a lavage effect. A mechanical lysis of scars or adhesions appears unlikely. Key words: epidural lysis of adhesions, epidural neurolysis, epidural neuroplasty, biomechanical, experimental, epidural, catheter, back pain, sciatica


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document