Monte Carlo estimation of dose distribution in water phantom

Author(s):  
O. Chibani ◽  
B. Philippon ◽  
R. Itti
1993 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki KATO ◽  
Masatoshi TSUZAKA ◽  
Shuji KOYAMA ◽  
Shoichi SUZUKI ◽  
Takeo ORITO ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeinab Fardi ◽  
Payvand Taherparvar

Abstract Permanent and temporary implantation of I-125 brachytherapy sources has become an official method for the treatment of different cancers. In this technique, it is essential to determine dose distribution around the brachytherapy source to choose the optimal treatment plan. In this study, the dosimetric parameters for a new interstitial brachytherapy source I-125 (IrSeed-125) were calculated with GATE/GEANT4 Monte Carlo code. Dose rate constant, radial dose function and 2D anisotropy function were calculated inside a water phantom (based on the recommendations of TG-43U1 protocol), and inside several tissue phantoms around the IrSeed-125 capsule. Acquired results were compared with MCNP simulation and experimental data. The dose rate constant of IrSeed-125 in the water phantom was about 1.038 cGy·h−1U−1 that shows good consistency with the experimental data. The radial dose function at 0.5, 0.9, 1.8, 3 and 7 cm radial distances were obtained as 1.095, 1.019, 0.826, 0.605, and 0.188, respectively. The results of the IrSeed-125 is not only in good agreement with those calculated by other simulation with MCNP code but also are closer to the experimental results. Discrepancies in the estimation of dose around IrSeed-125 capsule in the muscle and fat tissue phantoms are greater than the breast and lung phantoms in comparison with the water phantom. Results show that GATE/GEANT4 Monte Carlo code produces accurate results for dosimetric parameters of the IrSeed-125 LDR brachytherapy source with choosing the appropriate physics list. There are some differences in the dose calculation in the tissue phantoms in comparison with water phantom, especially in long distances from the source center, which may cause errors in the estimation of dose around brachytherapy sources that are not taken account by the TG43-U1 formalism.


2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 2455-2463 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. De Felici ◽  
R. Felici ◽  
M. Sanchez del Rio ◽  
C. Ferrero ◽  
T. Bacarian ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document