Modified Evidence Combination Method Based on Pignistic Probability Distance and Uncertainty Degree

Author(s):  
Dawei Xue ◽  
Yong Wang
Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 526
Author(s):  
Jian Wang ◽  
Jing-wei Zhu ◽  
Yafei Song

Existing methods employed for combining temporal and spatial evidence derived from multiple sources into a single coherent description of objects and their environments lack versatility in various applications such as multi-sensor target recognition. This is addressed in the present study by proposing an adaptive evidence fusion method based on the power pignistic probability distance. This method classifies evidence sets into non-conflicting and conflicting evidence sets based on the maximum power pignistic probability distance obtained between evidence pairs in the evidence set. Non-conflicting evidence sets are fused using Dempster’s rule, while conflicting evidence sets are fused using a weighted average combination method based on the power pignistic probability distance. The superior evidence fusion performance of the proposed method is demonstrated by comparisons with the performances of seven other fusion methods based on numerical examples with four different evidence conflict scenarios. The results show that the method proposed in this paper not only can properly fuse different types of evidence, but also provides an excellent focus on the components of evidence sets with high confidence, which is conducive to timely and accurate decisions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Bin Wu ◽  
Xiao Yi

Conflict evidence combination is an important research topic in evidence theory. In this paper, two kinds of transition matrices are constructed based on the Markov model; one is the unordered transition matrix, which satisfies the commutative law, and the other is the temporal transition matrix, which does not satisfy the commutative law, but it can handle the combination of temporal evidence well. Then, a temporal conflict evidence combination model is proposed based on these two transition matrices. First, the transition probability at the first n time is calculated through the model of unordered transition probability, and then, the transition matrix from the N + 1 time is used to solve the combination problem of temporal conflict evidence. The effectiveness of the transition matrix in the research of conflict evidence combination method is proved by the example analysis.


Author(s):  
Lifan Sun ◽  
Yuting Chang ◽  
Jiexin Pu ◽  
Haofang Yu ◽  
Zhe Yang

The Dempster-Shafer (D-S) theory is widely applied in various fields involved with multi-sensor information fusion for radar target tracking, which offers a useful tool for decision-making. However, the application of D-S evidence theory has some limitations when evidences are conflicting. This paper proposed a new method combining the Pignistic probability distance and the Deng entropy to address the problem. First, the Pignistic probability distance is applied to measure the conflict degree of evidences. Then, the uncertain information is measured by introducing the Deng entropy. Finally, the evidence correction factor is calculated for modifying the bodies of evidence, and the Dempster’s combination rule is adopted for evidence fusion. Simulation experiments illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method dealing with conflicting evidences.


2014 ◽  
Vol 536-537 ◽  
pp. 443-449
Author(s):  
Dong Ying Bai ◽  
Jun Han ◽  
Jian Wang ◽  
Song Li

Aiming at the paradox of D-S evidence theory and computations exponential growth in dealing with large scale conflict evidence combination, a new weighted evidence combination method was proposed, which used conflict coefficient and evidence distance in order to measure the conflict. Through the analysis of single conflict representations weaknesses, compound conflict coefficient has been put forward, meanwhile, the evidence center and current center distance were defined, evidence weight was determined with current center distance and conflict coefficient. The experiment results show that the algorithm settles the paradox effectively, at the same time, computing speed has been greatly enhanced.


2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 5139-5149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cholsok Yu ◽  
Jianhong Yang ◽  
Debin Yang ◽  
Xianghong Ma ◽  
Hyonchun Min

Author(s):  
Xiaochen Xing ◽  
Yuanwen Cai ◽  
Zhengyu Zhao ◽  
Long Cheng ◽  
Yan Li

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document