scholarly journals A max-margin training of RNA secondary structure prediction integrated with the thermodynamic model

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manato Akiyama ◽  
Kengo Sato ◽  
Yasubumi Sakakibara
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Secondary Structure ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Rna Secondary Structure ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Secondary Structure Prediction ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Rna Secondary Structure Prediction ◽  
Fine Grained

AbstractMotivation: A popular approach for predicting RNA secondary structure is the thermodynamic nearest neighbor model that finds a thermodynamically most stable secondary structure with the minimum free energy (MFE). For further improvement, an alternative approach that is based on machine learning techniques has been developed. The machine learning based approach can employ a fine-grained model that includes much richer feature representations with the ability to fit the training data. Although a machine learning based fine-grained model achieved extremely high performance in prediction accuracy, a possibility of the risk of overfitting for such model has been reported.Results: In this paper, we propose a novel algorithm for RNA secondary structure prediction that integrates the thermodynamic approach and the machine learning based weighted approach. Ourfine-grained model combines the experimentally determined thermodynamic parameters with a large number of scoring parameters for detailed contexts of features that are trained by the structured support vector machine (SSVM) with the ℓ1 regularization to avoid overfitting. Our benchmark shows that our algorithm achieves the best prediction accuracy compared with existing methods, and heavy overfitting cannot be observed.Availability: The implementation of our algorithm is available at https://github.com/keio-bioinformatics/mxfold.Contact:[email protected]

scholarly journals A max-margin training of RNA secondary structure prediction integrated with the thermodynamic model

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (06) ◽  
pp. 1840025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manato Akiyama ◽  
Kengo Sato ◽  
Yasubumi Sakakibara
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Secondary Structure ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Rna Secondary Structure ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Secondary Structure Prediction ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Rna Secondary Structure Prediction ◽  
Fine Grained

A popular approach for predicting RNA secondary structure is the thermodynamic nearest-neighbor model that finds a thermodynamically most stable secondary structure with minimum free energy (MFE). For further improvement, an alternative approach that is based on machine learning techniques has been developed. The machine learning-based approach can employ a fine-grained model that includes much richer feature representations with the ability to fit the training data. Although a machine learning-based fine-grained model achieved extremely high performance in prediction accuracy, a possibility of the risk of overfitting for such a model has been reported. In this paper, we propose a novel algorithm for RNA secondary structure prediction that integrates the thermodynamic approach and the machine learning-based weighted approach. Our fine-grained model combines the experimentally determined thermodynamic parameters with a large number of scoring parameters for detailed contexts of features that are trained by the structured support vector machine (SSVM) with the [Formula: see text] regularization to avoid overfitting. Our benchmark shows that our algorithm achieves the best prediction accuracy compared with existing methods, and heavy overfitting cannot be observed. The implementation of our algorithm is available at https://github.com/keio-bioinformatics/mxfold .

scholarly journals Deep Learning Method for RNA Secondary Structure Prediction with Pseudoknots Based on Large-Scale Data

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Bowen Shen ◽  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Cong Li ◽  
Tianheng Zhao ◽  
Yuanning Liu
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Secondary Structure ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Rna Secondary Structure ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Secondary Structure Prediction ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Rna Secondary Structure Prediction ◽  
Large Scale Data ◽  
Scale Data

Traditional machine learning methods are widely used in the field of RNA secondary structure prediction and have achieved good results. However, with the emergence of large-scale data, deep learning methods have more advantages than traditional machine learning methods. As the number of network layers increases in deep learning, there will often be problems such as increased parameters and overfitting. We used two deep learning models, GoogLeNet and TCN, to predict RNA secondary results. And from the perspective of the depth and width of the network, improvements are made based on the neural network model, which can effectively improve the computational efficiency while extracting more feature information. We process the existing real RNA data through experiments, use deep learning models to extract useful features from a large amount of RNA sequence data and structure data, and then predict the extracted features to obtain each base’s pairing probability. The characteristics of RNA secondary structure and dynamic programming methods are used to process the base prediction results, and the structure with the largest sum of the probability of each base pairing is obtained, and this structure will be used as the optimal RNA secondary structure. We, respectively, evaluated GoogLeNet and TCN models based on 5sRNA, tRNA data, and tmRNA data, and compared them with other standard prediction algorithms. The sensitivity and specificity of the GoogLeNet model on the 5sRNA and tRNA data sets are about 16% higher than the best prediction results in other algorithms. The sensitivity and specificity of the GoogLeNet model on the tmRNA dataset are about 9% higher than the best prediction results in other algorithms. As deep learning algorithms’ performance is related to the size of the data set, as the scale of RNA data continues to expand, the prediction accuracy of deep learning methods for RNA secondary structure will continue to improve.

scholarly journals Review of machine learning methods for RNA secondary structure prediction

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. e1009291
Author(s):  
Qi Zhao ◽  
Zheng Zhao ◽  
Xiaoya Fan ◽  
Zhengwei Yuan ◽  
Qian Mao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Secondary Structure ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Rna Secondary Structure ◽  
Secondary Structure Prediction ◽  
Computational Prediction ◽  
Prediction Methods ◽  
Comprehensive Overview ◽  
Rna Secondary Structure Prediction ◽  
New Methods

Secondary structure plays an important role in determining the function of noncoding RNAs. Hence, identifying RNA secondary structures is of great value to research. Computational prediction is a mainstream approach for predicting RNA secondary structure. Unfortunately, even though new methods have been proposed over the past 40 years, the performance of computational prediction methods has stagnated in the last decade. Recently, with the increasing availability of RNA structure data, new methods based on machine learning (ML) technologies, especially deep learning, have alleviated the issue. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of RNA secondary structure prediction methods based on ML technologies and a tabularized summary of the most important methods in this field. The current pending challenges in the field of RNA secondary structure prediction and future trends are also discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document