scholarly journals Real Signal Equalization for OQAM

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Md Navid Akbar ◽  
Mohammad Saquib
Keyword(s):  
Entropy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1309
Author(s):  
Yaoxin Zheng ◽  
Shiyan Li ◽  
Kang Xing ◽  
Xiaojuan Zhang

Despite the increased attention that has been given to the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based magnetic survey systems in the past decade, the processing of UAV magnetic data is still a tough task. In this paper, we propose a novel noise reduction method of UAV magnetic data based on complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN), permutation entropy (PE), correlation coefficient and wavelet threshold denoising. The original signal is first decomposed into several intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) by CEEMDAN, and the PE of each IMF is calculated. Second, IMFs are divided into four categories according to the quartiles of PE, namely, noise IMFs, noise-dominant IMFs, signal-dominant IMFs, and signal IMFs. Then the noise IMFs are removed, and correlation coefficients are used to identify the real signal-dominant IMFs. Finally, the wavelet threshold denoising is applied to the real signal-dominant IMFs, the denoised signal can be obtained by combining the signal IMFs and the denoised IMFs. Both synthetic and field experiments are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results show that the proposed method can eliminate the interference to a great extent, which lays a foundation for the further interpretation of UAV magnetic data.


2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 488-508
Author(s):  
S. G. Basiladze
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edme H. Hardy ◽  
Jürgen Hoferer ◽  
Dirk Mertens ◽  
Gerhard Kasper

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 603-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lazar V. Saranovac ◽  
Nada M. Vučijak

AbstractDetermination of the phase difference between two sinusoidal signals with noise components using samples of these signals is of interest in many measurement systems. The samples of signals are processed by one of many algorithms, such as 7PSF, UQDE and MSAL, to determine the phase difference. The phase difference result must be accompanied with estimation of the measurement uncertainty. The following issues are covered in this paper: the MSAL algorithm background, the ways of treating the bias influence on the phase difference result, comparison of results obtained by applying MSAL and the other mentioned algorithms to the same real signal samples, and evaluation of the uncertainty of the phase difference.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document