DoS Mitigation Mechanism Based on Non-Cooperative Repeated Game for SDN

Author(s):  
Guowei Wu ◽  
Zhaoxin Li ◽  
Lin Yao
Keyword(s):  
2004 ◽  
Vol 06 (04) ◽  
pp. 525-554
Author(s):  
GREGORY K. DOW

This paper replaces the standard view of the firm as a nexus of contracts with a repeated game framework where input contributions and side payments are self-enforced. General production technologies and flexible transfers among team members are allowed. When an incentive constraint binds, input demand and output supply are influenced by the discount factor, the probability of exogenous team dissolution, and the aggregate value of outside options. When this incentive constraint does not bind, the firm maximizes profit in the usual way. I discuss examples involving the Cobb-Douglas technology, firms with a single residual claimant, and partnerships.


2004 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 633-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
AVNER GREIF ◽  
DAVID D. LAITIN

This paper asks (a) why and how institutions change, (b) how an institution persists in a changing environment, and (c) how processes that it unleashes lead to its own demise. The paper shows that the game-theoretic notion of self-enforcing equilibrium and the historical institutionalist focus on process are both inadequate to answer these questions. Building on a game-theoretic foundation, but responding to the critique of it by historical institutionalists, the paper introduces the concepts of quasi-parameters and self reinforcement. With these concepts, and building on repeated game theory, a dynamic approach to institutions is offered, one that can account for endogenous change (and stability) of institutions. Contextual accounts of formal governing institutions in early modern Europe and the informal institution of cleavage structure in the contemporary world provide illustrations of the approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document