LS4BUCC: A Low Overhead Storage Architecture for Blockchain Based Unmanned Collaborative Cognition System

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xunhui Zhang ◽  
Huaimin Wang ◽  
Peichang Shi ◽  
Xiang Fu
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Cognition

scholarly journals Gender differences in older adults’ everyday cognitive collaboration

2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Margrett ◽  
Michael Marsiske
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Male Partner ◽  
Social Dilemma ◽  
Married Couples ◽  
Subjective Experiences ◽  
Female Partners ◽  
Collaborative Cognition ◽  
Printed Materials ◽  
Subjective Appraisals ◽  
Partner Gender

Collaborative cognition research has demonstrated that social partners can positively impact individuals’ thinking and problem-solving performance. Research in adulthood and aging has been less clear about dyadic effects, such as partner gender, on collaborative cognition. The current study examined the objective and subjective experiences of older men and women’s collaboration on three everyday problems. Tasks included comprehension of everyday printed materials, a social dilemma task, and an errand-planning task. A sample of 98 older married couples ( N = 196) worked both collaboratively and individually with either their spouse ( N = 52 dyads) or a stranger of the other gender ( N = 46 dyads). Analyses conducted using the actor-partner methodology (e.g., Gonzalez & Griffin, 1997; Kenny, 1996) suggest that men tended to be more influential during dyadic problem solving, particularly on more ambiguous tasks. Subjective appraisals of collaboration also varied between male and female partners, with familiarity of partner playing a large role in expectations of collaboration. Most notably, women assigned to work with an unfamiliar male partner tended to rate their satisfaction with collaborative teamwork less positively. Both self and partner-rated subjective appraisals, particularly expectations of competitiveness, were predictive of collaborative performance.

Sustaining Long-Term Success of Academy-Business Relationships

2021 ◽  
pp. 433-466
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Resource Management ◽  
Organizational Learning ◽  
The Other ◽  
Learning Collaborative ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Collaborative Cognition ◽  
Business Perspective ◽  
Organizational Partnerships

This chapter reflects on the other chapters in the book with an emphasis on turmoil and flux in both higher education and business. Major concerns include self-preservation, resource management, and transformational purposes. Separately, the academy and for-profit realms are facing complex issues. Once involved in inter-organizational partnerships, maintenance of successful relationships is promoted through organizational learning, collaborative cognition, and ethics. Again, issues and viewpoints from each direction are summarized and discussed: a business perspective and the academy's perspective. With fewer than 50 years of attention in this area and minimal organized research, the need for more and deeper exploration and inquiry are paramount and outlined.

But is it social? How to tell when groups are more than the sum of their members

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison A. Brennan ◽  
James T. Enns
Keyword(s):  
Social Interaction ◽  
Group Function ◽  
Collaborative Cognition ◽  
Self Differentiation ◽  
Statistical Effects

AbstractFailure to distinguish between statistical effects and genuine social interaction may lead to unwarranted conclusions about the role of self-differentiation in group function. We offer an introduction to these issues from the perspective of recent research on collaborative cognition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document